Literature DB >> 20153992

Women's experiences when ultrasound examinations give unexpected findings in the second trimester.

Eva Sommerseth1, Johanne Sundby.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Norway pregnant women who are not regarded to be in a risk group are offered one routine ultrasound around the 18(th) week of pregnancy. If serious abnormalities are diagnosed, the women may apply for a termination. RESEARCH QUESTION: The aim of this study was to describe and understand some pregnant women's thoughts, feelings and dilemmas of choice when unexpected findings were diagnosed after a routine ultrasound examination.
METHODS: This study was based on 22 semi-structured life world interviews. The women interviewed were informed of unexpected findings after undergoing routine ultrasound examinations around the 18(th) week of pregnancy. The analysis of the data was inspired by phenomenological research and followed the meaning condensation approach described by Kvale (1).
RESULTS: The informants' experiences are presented by showing how they described shifts between juxtaposed emotional states: hope-acceptance, distancing-denial and grief-guilt. All of the informants described these swings between different emotions as a state of continuous chaos. DISCUSSION: The discovery of abnormality in a wanted child at a late stage of pregnancy can evoke an emotional crisis for women. All the informants in this study described swings between different emotions as being in a state of continuous chaos. The women had to make difficult choices regarding their own future and that of their child.
CONCLUSION: Eliminating the anxiety and anguish experienced by women following a diagnosis of fetal abnormality is impossible. It must be possible, however, to mitigate their distress. Further research should develop methods to prepare women for coping in crises like these. Copyright (c) 2010 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20153992     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2010.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  10 in total

Review 1.  Health-care provider communication with expectant parents during a prenatal diagnosis: an integrative review.

Authors:  A L Kratovil; W A Julion
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  The Ghanaian woman's experience and perception of ultrasound use in antenatal care.

Authors:  Y B Mensah; K Nkyekyer; K Mensah
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2014-03

3.  Ultrasound's 'window on the womb' brings ethical challenges for balancing maternal and fetal health interests: obstetricians' experiences in Australia.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Rhonda Small; Ann Lalos; Margareta Persson; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Parent's experiences of counselling and their need for support following a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease--a qualitative study in a Swedish context.

Authors:  Ewa-Lena Bratt; Stina Järvholm; Britt-Marie Ekman-Joelsson; Lars-Åke Mattson; Mats Mellander
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  'Ultrasound is an invaluable third eye, but it can't see everything': a qualitative study with obstetricians in Australia.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Rhonda Small; Margareta Persson; Ann Lalos; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  When fetal hydronephrosis is suspected antenatally--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marie Oscarsson; Tomas Gottvall; Katarina Swahnberg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  First and second trimester ultrasound in pregnancy: A systematic review and metasynthesis of the views and experiences of pregnant women, partners, and health workers.

Authors:  Gill Moncrieff; Kenneth Finlayson; Sarah Cordey; Rebekah McCrimmon; Catherine Harris; Maria Barreix; Özge Tunçalp; Soo Downe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A qualitative study of the work experiences of midwives performing obstetric ultrasound in Norway.

Authors:  Magnhild Reiso; Berit Langli; Eva Sommerseth; Aud Johannessen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Parental experiences of uncertainty following an abnormal fetal anomaly scan: Insights using Han's taxonomy of uncertainty.

Authors:  Jennifer Hammond; Jasmijn E Klapwijk; Melissa Hill; Stina Lou; Kelly E Ormond; Karin E M Diderich; Sam Riedijk; Celine Lewis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.717

10.  Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Danielle Soucier; Karen Hanson; Melissa S Savage; Laird Jackson; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 8.822

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.