Literature DB >> 20153216

Randomised high- and low-dose heparin prophylaxis in patients undergoing thoracotomy for benign and malignant disease: effect on thrombo-elastography.

Saina Attaran1, Pavlo Somov, Wael I Awad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both cancer patients and patients undergoing surgery are thought to be at an increased risk of thrombo-embolic events. Consequently, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is administered to all such patients perioperatively. There is a lack of consensus in guidelines regarding the timing of administration and the dosage of thromboprophylactic agents. Studies have shown that thrombo-elastography (TEG) is a useful test in assessing global haemostatic function, and has been validated in monitoring the dosage of LMWH. In this study, we assess the coagulation status of patients undergoing thoracic surgery with TEG, and the effectiveness of administered LMWH for thromboprophylaxis.
METHODS: Thirty patients with primary lung cancer (LC) and 30 with benign lung disease (BL) were studied prospectively. Patients were randomised to receive subcutaneous LMWH 40 mg once or twice per day perioperatively. Their coagulation status was monitored with TEG preoperatively and postoperatively for 3 consecutive days.
RESULTS: Preoperative TEG parameters (k time, alpha angle and maximum amplitude (MA)) were within the normal range in both the LC and BL groups. Preoperative r time was prolonged in both the groups, but with no significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). Postoperatively, r time was prolonged in some patients receiving LMWH twice daily, suggesting a possible adequate thromboprophylaxis in these patients only.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the majority of patients with LC are not hypercoagulable. We also showed that LMWH once or twice a day might not provide sufficient thromboprophylaxis. We advocate screening for patients demonstrating hypercoagulable states and ensuring adequate thromboprophylaxis in this group of patients with careful monitoring. Copyright 2009 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20153216     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  9 in total

1.  The safety profile of preoperative administration of heparin for thromboprophylaxis in Chinese patients intended for thoracoscopic major thoracic surgery: a pilot randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Han-Yu Deng; Chang-Lin Shi; Gang Li; Jun Luo; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Yi-Dan Lin; Lun-Xu Liu; Qing-Hua Zhou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Low molecular weight heparin once versus twice for thromboprophylaxis following esophagectomy: a randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Jie-Qiong Song; Li-Zhen Xuan; Wei Wu; Jun-Feng Huang; Ming Zhong
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Preoperative thromboprophylactic administration of low-molecular-weight-heparin significantly decreased the risk of intraoperative bleeding compared with heparin in patients undergoing video-assisted lobectomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Gu-Ha A-Lai; Yun-Ke Zhu; Gang Li; Me-Wu-Jia Mai-Ji; Han-Yu Deng; Jun Luo; Ze-Guo Zhuo; Xu Shen; Yi-Dan Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-03

4.  The influence of heparin on coagulation function of patients undergoing video-assisted major thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Gu-Ha Alai; Han-Yu Deng; Gang Li; Jun Luo; Lun-Xu Liu; Yi-Dan Lin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Coagulation profile in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas Decker Christensen; Henrik Vad; Søren Pedersen; Kåre Hornbech; Nora Elisabeth Zois; Peter B Licht; Mads Nybo; Anne-Mette Hvas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Lung Cancer and Pulmonary Embolism: What Is the Relationship? A Review.

Authors:  Yupeng Li; Yu Shang; Wenwen Wang; Shangwei Ning; Hong Chen
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  [Perioperative Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis in Thoracic Cancer Patients: Chinese Experts Consensus - Interpretation of Perioperative Hypercoagulable State].

Authors:  Songping Cui; Hui Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2019-12-20

Review 8.  Anticoagulation for perioperative thromboprophylaxis in people with cancer.

Authors:  Charbel F Matar; Lara A Kahale; Maram B Hakoum; Ibrahim G Tsolakian; Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Victor Ed Yosuico; Irene Terrenato; Francesca Sperati; Maddalena Barba; Holger Schünemann; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-07-11

9.  Video-assisted Thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for lung cancer does not induce a procoagulant state.

Authors:  Thomas Decker Christensen; Henrik Vad; Søren Pedersen; Peter B Licht; Mads Nybo; Kåre Hornbech; Nora Elisabeth Zois; Anne-Mette Hvas
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2017-12-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.