Literature DB >> 20152853

The spatial distribution of receptive field changes in a model of peri-saccadic perception: predictive remapping and shifts towards the saccade target.

Marc Zirnsak1, Markus Lappe, Fred H Hamker.   

Abstract

At the time of an impending saccade receptive fields (RFs) undergo dynamic changes, that is, their spatial profile is altered. This phenomenon has been observed in several monkey visual areas. Although their link to eye movements is obvious, neither the exact pattern nor their function is fully clear. Several RF shifts have been interpreted in terms of predictive remapping mediating visual stability. In particular, even prior to saccade onset some cells become responsive to stimuli presented in their future, post-saccadic RF. In visual area V4, however, the overall effect of RF dynamics consists of a shrinkage and shift of RFs towards the saccade target. These observations have been linked to a pre-saccadically enhanced processing of the future fixation. In order to better understand these seemingly different outcomes, we analyzed the RF shifts predicted by a recently proposed computational model of peri-saccadic perception (Hamker, Zirnsak, Calow, & Lappe, 2008). This model unifies peri-saccadic compression, pre-saccadic attention shifts, and peri-saccadic receptive field dynamics in a common framework of oculomotor reentry signals in extrastriate visual cortical maps. According to the simulations that we present in the current paper, a spatially selective oculomotor feedback signal leads to RF dynamics which are both consistent with the observations made in studies aiming to investigate predictive remapping and saccade target shifts. Thus, the seemingly distinct experimental observations could be grounded in the same neural mechanism leading to different RF dynamics dependent on the location of the RF in visual space. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20152853     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Anticipatory saccade target processing and the presaccadic transfer of visual features.

Authors:  Marc Zirnsak; Ricarda G K Gerhards; Roozbeh Kiani; Markus Lappe; Fred H Hamker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Visual attention and stability.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Mathôt; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Computational models of spatial updating in peri-saccadic perception.

Authors:  Fred H Hamker; Marc Zirnsak; Arnold Ziesche; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Division of labor in frontal eye field neurons during presaccadic remapping of visual receptive fields.

Authors:  Sooyoon Shin; Marc A Sommer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Circuits for presaccadic visual remapping.

Authors:  Hrishikesh M Rao; J Patrick Mayo; Marc A Sommer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Saccades and shifting receptive fields: anticipating consequences or selecting targets?

Authors:  Marc Zirnsak; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Pre-saccadic shifts of visual attention.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Jason B Mattingley; Roger W Remington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Trans-saccadic priming in hemianopia: sighted-field sensitivity is boosted by a blind-field prime.

Authors:  Kay L Ritchie; Amelia R Hunt; Arash Sahraie
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Seeing via Miniature Eye Movements: A Dynamic Hypothesis for Vision.

Authors:  Ehud Ahissar; Amos Arieli
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Mislocalization of visual stimuli: independent effects of static and dynamic attention.

Authors:  Sung-en Chien; Fuminori Ono; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.