| Literature DB >> 20152021 |
Seung Pill Choi1, Kyu Nam Park, Hae Kwan Park, Jee Young Kim, Chun Song Youn, Kook Jin Ahn, Hyeon Woo Yim.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine whether the patterns of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) abnormalities and quantitative regional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values can predict the clinical outcome of comatose patients following cardiac arrest.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20152021 PMCID: PMC2875532 DOI: 10.1186/cc8874
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Care ISSN: 1364-8535 Impact factor: 9.097
The clinical characteristics of the 39 comatose patients who were resuscitated from cardiac arrest
| Favourable outcome | Unfavourable outcome | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients (n) | 13 | 26 | |
| Age (y) | 50.0 ± 16.2 | 48.5 ± 18.5 | 0.810 |
| Gender (male/female) | 8/5 | 20/6 | 0.314 |
| Witnessed arrest (n) | 8 | 16 | 1.000 |
| Bystander CPR (n) | 8 | 15 | 0.818 |
| Initial ECG on admission (n) | 0.008 | ||
| PEA | 0 | 5 | |
| VF/pulseless VT | 5 | 1 | |
| Asystole | 8 | 20 | |
| Resuscitation duration (min) | 14.8 ± 9.7 | 15.4 ± 12.4 | 0.892 |
| Time to MRI after ROSC (h) | 54.3 ± 44.5 | 52.2 ± 35.3 | 0.872 |
| Cause of arrest (n) | 0.077 | ||
| Cardiac | 8 | 8 | |
| Respiratory | 3 | 16 | |
| Unknown | 2 | 2 | |
| GOS (n) | |||
| 1. Death | 0 | 10 | |
| 2. Vegetative state | 0 | 14 | |
| 3. Severe neurologic impairment | 0 | 2 | |
| 4. Mild to moderate neurologic impairment | 2 | 0 | |
| 5. Complete recovery | 11 | 0 |
Mean ± S.D.; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; ECG, electrocardiogram; PEA, pulseless electrical activity; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular tachycardia; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; GOS, Glasgow outcome scale
Gender, witnessed arrest, bystander CPR, initial ECG on admission and cause of arrest in both groups were analysed by Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test.
Age, resuscitation duration and time between MRI and ROSC in both groups were compared by t-test.
Figure 1This figure shows the axial apparent diffusion coefficient maps indicating the 15 regions of interest. These regions were selected for quantitative measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient values. (1) precentral cortex, (2) postcentral cortex, (3) frontal cortex, (4) frontal white matter, (5) parietal cortex, (6) parietal white matter, (7) caudate nucleus, (8) putamen, (9) thalamus, (10) temporal cortex, (11) temporal white matter, (12) occipital cortex, (13) occipital white matter, (14) pons, and (15) cerebellum.
Figure 2Apparent diffusion coefficient map with colour shades (A), diffusion-weighted imaging (B) and T2-weighted image (C) from one representative patient at seven hours after cardiac arrest. Regions of low apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) showed a blue colour; in contrast, regions of high ADC showed a white colour. The colour shades on the ADC maps identified the pixel showing the minimum ADC value in each brain region. A 3D cursor (arrow) was used to select the predefined spot (right thalamus) simultaneously in the three different sequences, and it can be easy to mark the area with the minimum ADC on the ADC maps based on the T2-weighted image (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The circular region-of-interest (ROI) cursors were positioned on the areas with the minimum ADC in each brain region. Severely restricted diffusion within the ROIs was shown in the caudate nucleus (0.238 × 10-3mm2/sec), putamen (0.299 × 10-3mm2/sec), thalamus (0.290 × 10-3mm2/sec), and occipital grey matter (0.184 × 10-3mm2/sec) but not in the occipital white matter (0.712 × 10-3mm2/sec).
Restricted diffusion abnormalities on the diffusion-weighted imaging for patients with anoxic encephalopathy
| Brain region | Favourable outcome (n = 13) | Unfavourable outcome (n = 26) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cerebral cortex | 1 (8) | 21 (81) | < 0.001 |
| Frontal | 0 (0) | 18 (69) | < 0.001 |
| Parietal | 1 (8) | 20 (77) | < 0.001 |
| Temporal | 1 (8) | 16 (62) | 0.002 |
| Occipital | 1 (8) | 20 (77) | < 0.001 |
| Rolandic | 1 (8) | 21 (81) | < 0.001 |
| Precentral | 0 (0) | 21 (81) | < 0.001 |
| Postcentral | 1 (8) | 20 (77) | < 0.001 |
| Subcortical white matter | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Basal ganglia | 3 (23) | 19 (77) | 0.002 |
| Caudate nuclei | 2 (15) | 17 (65) | 0.006 |
| Putamen | 2 (15) | 17 (65) | 0.006 |
| Thalamus | 2 (15) | 16 (62) | 0.008 |
| Cerebellum | 0 (0) | 7 (27) | 0.073 |
| Pons | 0 (0) | 2 (8) | 0.544 |
The data are given in numbers (percentages) of patients. Statistical analyses were done by Fisher's exact test.
Patterns of diffusion-weighted imaging abnormalities in the two outcome groups
| Pattern | Favourable outcome (n = 13) | Unfavourable outcome (n = 26) |
|---|---|---|
| Normal* | 10 (77) | 4 (15) |
| Cortex | 0 (0) | 1 (7) |
| Deep grey nuclei | 2 (15) | 1 (7) |
| Cortex and deep grey nuclei* | 1 (8) | 20 (77) |
The data are given in numbers (percentages) of patients.
Deep grey nuclei include caudate nucleus, putamen, and thalamus in this study.
*There were significant differences (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.001) in the number of patients with normal findings or mixed cortex and deep grey nuclei injuries between the two groups. Other comparisons were non-significant between the groups.
The ADC values of the individual brain regions in the patients and the control subjects (mean ADC ± SD; × 10-3mm2/sec)
| Brain region | Patients (n = 22) | Controls (n = 23) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Favourable outcome (n = 7) | Unfavourable outcome (n = 15) | ||
| Frontal cortex | 0.917 ± 0.056 | 0.563 ± 0.232a,b | 0.859 ± 0.057 |
| Frontal white matter | 0.736 ± 0.031 | 0.738 ± 0.050a | 0.697 ± 0.035 |
| Parietal cortex | 0.860 ± 0.088 | 0.475 ± 0.167a,b | 0.877 ± 0.040 |
| Parietal white matter | 0.741 ± 0.070 | 0.774 ± 0.084 | 0.744 ± 0.043 |
| Temporal cortex | 0.910 ± 0.052 | 0.616 ± 0.291a,b | 0.926 ± 0.050 |
| Temporal white matter | 0.781 ± 0.044 | 0.796 ± 0.056 | 0.778 ± 0.026 |
| Occipital cortex | 0.911 ± 0.032 | 0.417 ± 0.184a,b | 0.896 ± 0.044 |
| Occipital white matter | 0.768 ± 0.086 | 0.741 ± 0.067 | 0.762 ± 0.032 |
| Precentral cortex | 0.743 ± 0.085 | 0.425 ± 0.149 a,b | 0.719 ± 0.028 |
| Postcentral cortex | 0.737 ± 0.083 | 0.494 ± 0.173a,b | 0.725 ± 0.036 |
| Caudate nucleus | 0.770 ± 0.069 | 0.589 ± 0.204a,b | 0.808 ± 0.065 |
| Putamen | 0.763 ± 0.093 | 0.456 ± 0.138a,b | 0.788 ± 0.050 |
| Thalamus | 0.824 ± 0.079 | 0.563 ± 0.144a,b | 0.790 ± 0.044 |
| Cerebellum | 0.731 ± 0.084 | 0.690 ± 0.130 | 0.757 ± 0.043 |
| Pons | 0.740 ± 0.072 | 0.753 ± 0.111 | 0.769 ± 0.056 |
aSignificant compared to the controls at P < 0.05 using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Scheffe post hoc test.
bSignificant when comparing the unfavourable outcomes to the favourable outcomes at P < 0.05 using one way ANOVA with the Scheffe post hoc test.
ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient
Figure 3Boxplot showing the distribution of the percent apparent diffusion coefficient values for the different brain regions of the control (white bars), favourable (striped bars), and unfavourable (grey bars) groups. The percent apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated using the mean normal control value of each brain region.
Prediction of unfavourable outcome using the optimal cutoffs of the ADC and the percent ADC
| Grey matter structures | Optimal cutoff | Sensitivity with 95% CI | Specificity with 95% CI | PPV with 95% CI | NPV with 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADC | ||||||
| Frontal cortex | 0.685 | 79 | 73% (45 to 85%) | 100% (56 to 100%) | 100% (68 to 100%) | 64% (32 to 88%) |
| Parietal cortex* | 0.674 | 77 | 87% (58 to 98%) | 100% (56 to 100%) | 100% (72 to 100%) | 78% (40 to 96%) |
| Temporal cortex | 0.640 | 69 | 67% (39 to 87%) | 100% (56 to 100%) | 100% (66 to 100%) | 58% (29 to 84%) |
| Occipital cortex* | 0.740 | 82 | 93% (66 to 100%) | 100% (56 to 100%) | 100% (73 to 100%) | 88% (47 to 99%) |
| Precentral cortex* | 0.606 | 84 | 87% (58 to 98%) | 100% (56 to 100%) | 100% (72 to 100%) | 78% (40 to 96%) |
| Postcentral cortex | 0.625 | 86 | 73% (45 to 91%) | 100% (56 to 100%) | 100% (68 to 100%) | 64% (32 to 88%) |
| Caudate nucleus | 0.621 | 76 | 67% (39 to 87%) | 100% (56 to 100%) | 100% (66 to 100%) | 58% (29 to 84%) |
| Putamen* | 0.590 | 75 | 93% (66 to 100%) | 100% (56 to 100%) | 100% (73 to 100%) | 88% (47 to 99%) |
| Thalamus* | 0.647 | 85 | 87% (58 to 98%) | 100% (56 to 100%) | 100% (72 to 100%) | 78% (40 to 96%) |
ADC unit × 10-3 mm2/sec; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value
Optimal cutoff values predicting unfavourable outcome were determined by ROC curve analysis in patients and controls.
*Area under the ROC curve was greater than 0.9 with a P value less than 0.001.
**Percent ADC expressed the (absolute ADC value/mean normal control ADC value) × 100.