Literature DB >> 20151930

Development of a new method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression: CAMEQ2-HF.

Brian C J Moore1, Brian R Glasberg, Michael A Stone.   

Abstract

Moore et al (1999b) described a procedure, CAMEQ, for the initial fitting of multi-channel compression hearing aids. The procedure was derived using a model of loudness perception for impaired hearing. We describe here the development of a new fitting method, CAMEQ2-HF, which differs from CAMEQ in the following ways: (1) CAMEQ2-HF gives recommended gains for centre frequencies up to 10 kHz, whereas the upper limit for CAMEQ is 6 kHz; (2) CAMEQ is based on the assumption that the hearing aid user faces the person they wish to hear and uses a free-field-to-eardrum transfer function for frontal incidence. CAMEQ2-HF is based on the assumption that the user may wish to hear sounds from many directions, and uses a diffuse-field-to-eardrum transfer function; (3) CAMEQ2-HF is based on an improved loudness model for impaired hearing; (4) CAMEQ2-HF is based on recent wideband measurements of the average spectrum of speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20151930     DOI: 10.3109/14992020903296746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  31 in total

1.  The influence of hearing-aid compression on forward-masked thresholds for adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptive methods for paediatric hearing-aid fitting: predicted speech intelligibility and loudness.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Earl E Johnson; Sanna Hou; Harvey Dillon; Vicky Zhang; Lauren Burns; Patricia van Buynder; Angela Wong; Christopher Flynn
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Survey of Current Practice in the Fitting and Fine-Tuning of Common Signal-Processing Features in Hearing Aids for Adults.

Authors:  Melinda C Anderson; Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Analog-to-digital conversion to accommodate the dynamics of live music in hearing instruments.

Authors:  Neil S Hockley; Frauke Bahlmann; Bernadette Fulton
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-09

5.  Effect of audibility on spatial release from speech-on-speech masking.

Authors:  Helen Glyde; Jörg M Buchholz; Lillian Nielsen; Virginia Best; Harvey Dillon; Sharon Cameron; Louise Hickson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Preliminary evaluation of a light-based contact hearing device for the hearing impaired.

Authors:  Jonathan P Fay; Rodney Perkins; Suzanne Carr Levy; Michael Nilsson; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 7.  NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Harvey Dillon; Lyndal Carter; Anna O'Brien
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-11-30

8.  The Influence of Hearing Aid Gain on Gap-Detection Thresholds for Children and Adults With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery; Emily Buss; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effect of hearing aid bandwidth on speech recognition performance of listeners using a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid (bimodal hearing).

Authors:  Arlene C Neuman; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  Effects of bandwidth, compression speed, and gain at high frequencies on preferences for amplified music.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.