OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether the thickness of the non-contrast-enhanced myocardial rim (RIM) predicts recovery of territorial myocardial function after revascularization in chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). BACKGROUND: Non-contrast-enhanced dysfunctional myocardium at late gadolinium-enhanced CMR depicts the presence of viable myocardium. METHODS: In 29 patients (65 +/- 8 years) with ICM (EF 33 +/- 10), ceCMR and cine images were acquired 5 +/- 10 days before revascularization. Cine images were repeated after 6 months. Regional wall thickness, wall thickening and RIM were determined in each of 12 segments per short-axis slice (4-8/patient), which were assigned to the respective supplying coronary artery (LAD, LCX and RCA). A threshold for normal wall-thickening was derived from a control group (n = 14; 52 +/- 17 years). Functional improvement at follow-up was defined as wall thickening >2 mm. RESULTS: Of the 1,896 analyzed segments, 655 segments showed severe dysfunction. At follow-up, 307 segments demonstrated functional improvement. The RIM differed between segments with and without improvement (6.6 +/- 2.4 mm vs. 2.8 +/- 2.0 mm; p < 0.0001). The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) for predicting overall functional recovery was 0.91 (95%, CI 0.88-0.93, p < 0.001). A RIM of 4.0 mm predicted functional recovery after revascularization of the supplying coronary artery with a sensitivity and a specificity of 88 and 82% for the LAD, 96 and 86% for the RCA and 88 and 83% for the LCX, respectively. CONCLUSION: RIM may be a useful marker for predicting territorial functional recovery after revascularization in patients with chronic ICM.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether the thickness of the non-contrast-enhanced myocardial rim (RIM) predicts recovery of territorial myocardial function after revascularization in chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). BACKGROUND: Non-contrast-enhanced dysfunctional myocardium at late gadolinium-enhanced CMR depicts the presence of viable myocardium. METHODS: In 29 patients (65 +/- 8 years) with ICM (EF 33 +/- 10), ceCMR and cine images were acquired 5 +/- 10 days before revascularization. Cine images were repeated after 6 months. Regional wall thickness, wall thickening and RIM were determined in each of 12 segments per short-axis slice (4-8/patient), which were assigned to the respective supplying coronary artery (LAD, LCX and RCA). A threshold for normal wall-thickening was derived from a control group (n = 14; 52 +/- 17 years). Functional improvement at follow-up was defined as wall thickening >2 mm. RESULTS: Of the 1,896 analyzed segments, 655 segments showed severe dysfunction. At follow-up, 307 segments demonstrated functional improvement. The RIM differed between segments with and without improvement (6.6 +/- 2.4 mm vs. 2.8 +/- 2.0 mm; p < 0.0001). The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) for predicting overall functional recovery was 0.91 (95%, CI 0.88-0.93, p < 0.001). A RIM of 4.0 mm predicted functional recovery after revascularization of the supplying coronary artery with a sensitivity and a specificity of 88 and 82% for the LAD, 96 and 86% for the RCA and 88 and 83% for the LCX, respectively. CONCLUSION: RIM may be a useful marker for predicting territorial functional recovery after revascularization in patients with chronic ICM.
Authors: Harald Peter Kühl; Arno van der Weerdt; Aernout Beek; Frans Visser; Peter Hanrath; Albert van Rossum Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2005-12-13 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: O P Simonetti; R J Kim; D S Fieno; H B Hillenbrand; E Wu; J M Bundy; J P Finn; R M Judd Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: P Perrone-Filardi; S L Bacharach; V Dilsizian; S Maurea; J A Marin-Neto; J A Arrighi; J A Frank; R O Bonow Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1992-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: J Tillisch; R Brunken; R Marshall; M Schwaiger; M Mandelkern; M Phelps; H Schelbert Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1986-04-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christoph J Jensen; Holger C Eberle; Kai Nassenstein; Thomas Schlosser; Mani Farazandeh; Christoph K Naber; Georg V Sabin; Oliver Bruder Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 5.460