Literature DB >> 20151103

[Chest compression quality : Can feedback technology help?].

R P Lukas1, C Sengelhoff, S Döpker, U Harding, P Mertens, N Osada, H Van Aken, T P Weber, A Bohn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) depends on the quality of chest compressions. Current European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines promote the development of feedback systems. However, no studies presenting satisfactory results of feedback use have been published.
METHODS: A total of 60 patients with cardiac arrest (> or =18 years of age) received resuscitation attempts using an automated external defibrillator (AED) with real-time feedback by the ambulance service of the City of Münster. The frequency of chest compressions, no-flow time (NFT) and depth of chest compressions were analyzed for the first three cycles of CPR and compared to the ERC guidelines 2005.
RESULTS: Chest compression frequency did not differ significantly from the ideal as set out in the guidelines. Analysis of NFTs showed significantly longer NFT for the first cycle but NFT for the second and third cycles did not differ significantly from the ideal. The target depth of 4-5 cm was achieved in 80% of all chest compressions in the first 3 cycles.
CONCLUSION: With the AED real-time feedback technology used in this study standardized performance of chest compressions could be maintained in a professional ambulance service. Implementation of a feedback system requires training of ambulance staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20151103     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-009-1671-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  14 in total

1.  Effect of rescuer fatigue on performance of continuous external chest compressions over 3 min.

Authors:  A Ashton; A McCluskey; C L Gwinnutt; A M Keenan
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Lars Wik; Jo Kramer-Johansen; Helge Myklebust; Hallstein Sørebø; Leif Svensson; Bob Fellows; Petter Andreas Steen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support.

Authors:  Jerry P Nolan; Charles D Deakin; Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Gary Smith
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Quality of BLS decreases with increasing resuscitation complexity.

Authors:  Jon C Rittenberger; Guy Guimond; Thomas E Platt; David Hostler
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 5.  Feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Andreas Bohn; Philipp Gude
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.706

6.  Doing a few things right.

Authors:  Thomas P Weber
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 7.  [The new 2005 resuscitation guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council: comments and supplements].

Authors:  V Wenzel; S Russo; H R Arntz; J Bahr; M A Baubin; B W Böttiger; B Dirks; V Dörges; C Eich; M Fischer; B Wolcke; S Schwab; W G Voelckel; H W Gervais
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Adverse hemodynamic effects of interrupting chest compressions for rescue breathing during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.

Authors:  R A Berg; A B Sanders; K B Kern; R W Hilwig; J W Heidenreich; M E Porter; G A Ewy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study.

Authors:  Jo Kramer-Johansen; Helge Myklebust; Lars Wik; Bob Fellows; Leif Svensson; Hallstein Sørebø; Petter Andreas Steen
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Delaying defibrillation to give basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation to patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Lars Wik; Trond Boye Hansen; Frode Fylling; Thorbjørn Steen; Per Vaagenes; Bjørn H Auestad; Petter Andreas Steen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Real-time feedback systems for improvement of resuscitation quality].

Authors:  R P Lukas; H Van Aken; P Engel; A Bohn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  External chest compressions using a mechanical feedback device : cross-over simulation study.

Authors:  M Skorning; M Derwall; J C Brokmann; D Rörtgen; S Bergrath; J Pflipsen; S Beuerlein; R Rossaint; S K Beckers
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Effect of the Cardio First Angel™ device on CPR indices: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Amir Vahedian-Azimi; Mohammadreza Hajiesmaeili; Ali Amirsavadkouhi; Hamidreza Jamaati; Morteza Izadi; Seyed J Madani; Seyed M R Hashemian; Andrew C Miller
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Monitoring of in-hospital cardiac arrest events with the focus on Automated External Defibrillators--a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Thomas Wurmb; Tina Vollmer; Peter Sefrin; Martin Kraus; Oliver Happel; Christian Wunder; Andreas Steinisch; Norbert Roewer; Sebastian Maier
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  A randomised trial of the effectiveness of instructor versus automated manikin feedback for training junior doctors in life support skills.

Authors:  Chris Wilson; Erin Furness; Leah Proctor; Greg Sweetman; Kathryn Hird
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2020-11-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.