OBJECTIVES: To explore the use of the neonatal near miss concept as a tool to evaluate the quality of neonatal care, as 3 million early neonatal deaths occur every year around the world and the majority of these deaths are avoidable and take place in developing countries. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the 2005 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health, a cross-sectional study, using data from 19 randomly selected Brazilian hospitals. A pragmatic definition of neonatal near miss was developed and tested. Near miss indicators were calculated. RESULTS: Among the 15,169 live born infants included in this analysis, 424 presented at least one of the following conditions: very low birth weight, less than 30 gestational weeks at birth or an Apgar score at the 5th minute of life less than 7. According to the operational definition, these survivors from life-threatening conditions were considered neonatal near miss cases. The early neonatal mortality rate was 8.2/1,000 live births, the neonatal near miss rate was 21.4 neonatal near miss cases/1,000 live births. Substantial variations in the mortality among neonates with life-threatening conditions at birth were observed suggesting intra-hospital quality of care issues. CONCLUSION: The near miss concept and indicators provided information that could be useful to evaluate the quality of care and set priorities for further assessments and health care improvement for newborn infants.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the use of the neonatal near miss concept as a tool to evaluate the quality of neonatal care, as 3 million early neonatal deaths occur every year around the world and the majority of these deaths are avoidable and take place in developing countries. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the 2005 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health, a cross-sectional study, using data from 19 randomly selected Brazilian hospitals. A pragmatic definition of neonatal near miss was developed and tested. Near miss indicators were calculated. RESULTS: Among the 15,169 live born infants included in this analysis, 424 presented at least one of the following conditions: very low birth weight, less than 30 gestational weeks at birth or an Apgar score at the 5th minute of life less than 7. According to the operational definition, these survivors from life-threatening conditions were considered neonatal near miss cases. The early neonatal mortality rate was 8.2/1,000 live births, the neonatal near miss rate was 21.4 neonatal near miss cases/1,000 live births. Substantial variations in the mortality among neonates with life-threatening conditions at birth were observed suggesting intra-hospital quality of care issues. CONCLUSION: The near miss concept and indicators provided information that could be useful to evaluate the quality of care and set priorities for further assessments and health care improvement for newborn infants.
Authors: João Paulo Souza; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu; Guillermo Carroli; Pisake Lumbiganon; Zahida Qureshi Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Annettee Nakimuli; Scovia N Mbalinda; Rose C Nabirye; Othman Kakaire; Sarah Nakubulwa; Michael O Osinde; Nelson Kakande; Dan K Kaye Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Juliana P Santos; Cynthia Pileggi-Castro; Jose S Camelo; Antonio A Silva; Pablo Duran; Suzanne J Serruya; Jose G Cecatti Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Andrea Solnes Miltenburg; Yadira Roggeveen; Marianne van Elteren; Laura Shields; Joske Bunders; Jos van Roosmalen; Jelle Stekelenburg Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2013-02-08
Authors: Paula Maria Silveira Soares Moura; Izildinha Maestá; Lígia Maria Souza Suppo Rugolo; Luís Felipe Ramos Berbel Angulski; Antônio Prates Caldeira; José Carlos Peraçoli; Marilza Vieira Cunha Rudge Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Juliana P Santos; José G Cecatti; Suzanne J Serruya; Paulo V Almeida; Pablo Duran; Bremen de Mucio; Cynthia Pileggi-Castro Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.365
Authors: Pauline Lorena Kale; Maria Helena Prado de Mello Jorge; Ruy Laurenti; Sandra Costa Fonseca; Kátia Silveira da Silva Journal: Rev Saude Publica Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 2.106