UNLABELLED: Human antibodies targeting prostate cancer cell surface epitopes may be useful for imaging and therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the tumor targeting of an internalizing human antibody fragment, a small-size platform, to provide high contrast in a mouse model of human prostate carcinoma. METHODS: A prostate tumor-targeting single-chain antibody fragment (scFv), UA20, along with a nonbinding control scFv, N3M2, were labeled with (99m)Tc and evaluated for binding and rapid internalization into human prostate tumor cells in vitro and tumor homing in vivo using xenograft models. For the in vitro studies, the labeled UA20 scFv was incubated at 37 degrees C for 1 h with metastatic prostate cancer cells (DU145) to assess the total cellular uptake versus intracellular uptake. For the animal studies, labeled UA20 and N3M2 scFvs were administered to athymic mice implanted subcutaneously with DU145 cells. Mice were imaged with small-animal SPECT/CT with concomitant biodistribution at 1 and 3 h after injection. RESULTS: The UA20 scFv was labeled in 55%-65% yield and remained stable in phosphate buffer within 24 h. The labeled UA20 scFv was taken up specifically by prostate tumor cells. Internalization was rapid, because incubation at 37 degrees C for less than 1 h resulted in 93% internalization of total cell-associated scFvs. In animal studies, SPECT/CT showed significant tumor uptake as early as 1 h after injection. At 3 h after injection, tumor uptake was 4.4 percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g), significantly greater than all organs or tissues studied (liver, 2.7 %ID/g; other organs or tissues, <1 %ID/g), except the kidneys (81.4 %ID/g), giving tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-muscle ratios of 12:1 and 70:1, respectively. In contrast, the control antibody exhibited a tumor uptake of only 0.26 %ID/g, similar to that of muscle and fat. Tumor-specific targeting was evidenced by reduced tumor uptake of nearly 70% on administration of a 10-fold excess of unlabeled UA20 scFv. Kidney uptake was nonspecific, consistent with the route of excretion by scFvs. CONCLUSION: The UA20 scFv showed rapid and specific internalization in prostate tumor cells in vitro and accumulation in prostate tumor xenografts in vivo, demonstrating the potential for future development for prostate cancer imaging and targeted therapy.
UNLABELLED: Human antibodies targeting prostate cancer cell surface epitopes may be useful for imaging and therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the tumor targeting of an internalizing human antibody fragment, a small-size platform, to provide high contrast in a mouse model of humanprostate carcinoma. METHODS:A prostate tumor-targeting single-chain antibody fragment (scFv), UA20, along with a nonbinding control scFv, N3M2, were labeled with (99m)Tc and evaluated for binding and rapid internalization into humanprostate tumor cells in vitro and tumor homing in vivo using xenograft models. For the in vitro studies, the labeled UA20scFv was incubated at 37 degrees C for 1 h with metastatic prostate cancer cells (DU145) to assess the total cellular uptake versus intracellular uptake. For the animal studies, labeled UA20 and N3M2 scFvs were administered to athymic mice implanted subcutaneously with DU145 cells. Mice were imaged with small-animal SPECT/CT with concomitant biodistribution at 1 and 3 h after injection. RESULTS: The UA20scFv was labeled in 55%-65% yield and remained stable in phosphate buffer within 24 h. The labeled UA20scFv was taken up specifically by prostate tumor cells. Internalization was rapid, because incubation at 37 degrees C for less than 1 h resulted in 93% internalization of total cell-associated scFvs. In animal studies, SPECT/CT showed significant tumor uptake as early as 1 h after injection. At 3 h after injection, tumor uptake was 4.4 percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g), significantly greater than all organs or tissues studied (liver, 2.7 %ID/g; other organs or tissues, <1 %ID/g), except the kidneys (81.4 %ID/g), giving tumor-to-blood and tumor-to-muscle ratios of 12:1 and 70:1, respectively. In contrast, the control antibody exhibited a tumor uptake of only 0.26 %ID/g, similar to that of muscle and fat. Tumor-specific targeting was evidenced by reduced tumor uptake of nearly 70% on administration of a 10-fold excess of unlabeled UA20scFv. Kidney uptake was nonspecific, consistent with the route of excretion by scFvs. CONCLUSION: The UA20scFv showed rapid and specific internalization in prostate tumor cells in vitro and accumulation in prostate tumor xenografts in vivo, demonstrating the potential for future development for prostate cancer imaging and targeted therapy.
Authors: Valerie Humblet; Rena Lapidus; Larry R Williams; Takashi Tsukamoto; Camilo Rojas; Pavel Majer; Bunda Hin; Shunsuke Ohnishi; Alec M De Grand; Atif Zaheer; Jürgen T Renze; Akira Nakayama; Barbara S Slusher; John V Frangioni Journal: Mol Imaging Date: 2005 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 4.488
Authors: Catherine A Foss; Ronnie C Mease; Hong Fan; Yuchuan Wang; Hayden T Ravert; Robert F Dannals; Rafal T Olszewski; Warren D Heston; Alan P Kozikowski; Martin G Pomper Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Michael J Morris; Chaitanya R Divgi; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Maria Batraki; Nyasha Warren; Angelo Nacca; Peter Smith-Jones; Lawrence Schwartz; W Kevin Kelly; Susan Slovin; David Solit; Jennifer Halpern; Anthony Delacruz; Tracy Curley; Ronald Finn; Joseph A O'donoghue; Philip Livingston; Steven Larson; Howard I Scher Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-10-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Renate Parry; Doug Schneider; Debra Hudson; Debbie Parkes; Jian-Ai Xuan; Alicia Newton; Pam Toy; Rick Lin; Rick Harkins; Bruno Alicke; Sandra Biroc; Peter J Kretschmer; Meredith Halks-Miller; Helmut Klocker; Ying Zhu; Brent Larsen; Ronald R Cobb; Peter Bringmann; Georg Roth; Jason S Lewis; Harald Dinter; Gordon Parry Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Matthew I Milowsky; David M Nanus; Lale Kostakoglu; Christine E Sheehan; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Stanley J Goldsmith; Jeffrey S Ross; Neil H Bander Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Tove Olafsen; Zhennan Gu; Mark A Sherman; Jeffrey V Leyton; Michael E Witkosky; John E Shively; Andrew A Raubitschek; Sherie L Morrison; Anna M Wu; Robert E Reiter Journal: J Immunother Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.456
Authors: Arun K Iyer; Xiaoli Lan; Xiaodong Zhu; Yang Su; Jinjin Feng; Xiaoju Zhang; Dongwei Gao; Youngho Seo; Henry F Vanbrocklin; V Courtney Broaddus; Bin Liu; Jiang He Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Daniel W Sherbenou; Blake T Aftab; Yang Su; Christopher R Behrens; Arun Wiita; Aaron C Logan; Diego Acosta-Alvear; Byron C Hann; Peter Walter; Marc A Shuman; Xiaobo Wu; John P Atkinson; Jeffrey L Wolf; Thomas G Martin; Bin Liu Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Xiaodong Zhu; Scott Bidlingmaier; Rintaro Hashizume; C David James; Mitchel S Berger; Bin Liu Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Han Jiang; Benjamin B Kasten; Hongguang Liu; Shibo Qi; Yang Liu; Mei Tian; Charles L Barnes; Hong Zhang; Zhen Cheng; Paul D Benny Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Yang Su; Yue Liu; Christopher R Behrens; Scott Bidlingmaier; Nam-Kyung Lee; Rahul Aggarwal; Daniel W Sherbenou; Alma L Burlingame; Byron C Hann; Jeffry P Simko; Gayatri Premasekharan; Pamela L Paris; Marc A Shuman; Youngho Seo; Eric J Small; Bin Liu Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2018-09-06
Authors: Sinan Wang; Jun Li; Jun Hua; Yang Su; Denis R Beckford-Vera; Walter Zhao; Mayuri Jayaraman; Tony L Huynh; Ning Zhao; Yung-Hua Wang; Yangjie Huang; Fujun Qin; Sui Shen; Daniel Gioeli; Robert Dreicer; Renuka Sriram; Emily A Egusa; Jonathan Chou; Felix Y Feng; Rahul Aggarwal; Michael J Evans; Youngho Seo; Bin Liu; Robert R Flavell; Jiang He Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-12-08 Impact factor: 13.801