Literature DB >> 20148701

Three endpoints of in vivo tumour radiobiology and their statistical estimation.

Eugene Demidenko1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the existing endpoints of tumour growth delay assays in experimental radiobiology with an emphasis on their efficient estimation for statistically significant identification of the treatment effect. To mathematically define doubling time (DT), tumour-growth delay (TGD) and cancer-cell surviving fraction (SF) in vivo using exponential growth and regrowth models with tumour volume measurements obtained from animal experiments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A statistical model-based approach is used to define and efficiently estimate the three endpoints of tumour therapy in experimental cancer research.
RESULTS: The log scale is advocated for plotting the tumour volume data and the respective analysis. Therefore, the geometric mean should be used to display the mean tumour volume data, and the group comparison should be a t-test for the log volume to comply with the Gaussian-distribution assumption. The relationship between cancer-cell SF, TGD and rate of growth is rigorously established. The widespread formula for cell kill is corrected; it has been rigorously shown that TGD is the difference between DTs. The software for the tumour growth delay analysis based on the mixed modeling approach with a complete set of instructions and example can be found on the author's webpage.
CONCLUSIONS: The existing practice for TGD data analysis from animal experiments suffers from imprecision and large standard errors that yield low power and statistically insignificant treatment effect. This practice should be replaced with a model-based statistical analysis on the log scale.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20148701      PMCID: PMC2900851          DOI: 10.3109/09553000903419304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  18 in total

1.  Nobody needs "relative tumour sizes" to compare tumour growth curves.

Authors:  I D Bassukas; G Hofmockel
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  Predicting the course of Gompertzian growth.

Authors:  L Norton; R Simon; H D Brereton; A E Bogden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Pretreatment photosensitizer dosimetry reduces variation in tumor response.

Authors:  Xiaodong Zhou; Brian W Pogue; Bin Chen; Eugene Demidenko; Rohan Joshi; Jack Hoopes; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Statistical approaches to experimental design and data analysis of in vivo studies.

Authors:  J J Hanfelt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  Quantitation and gompertzian analysis of tumor growth.

Authors:  K Rygaard; M Spang-Thomsen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Experimental antitumor activity of taxotere (RP 56976, NSC 628503), a taxol analogue.

Authors:  M C Bissery; D Guénard; F Guéritte-Voegelein; F Lavelle
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Metastatic tumor doubling time is an independent predictor of intrapulmonary recurrence after pulmonary resection of solitary pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yoshito Tomimaru; Shingo Noura; Masayuki Ohue; Jiro Okami; Kazuyuki Oda; Masahiko Higashiyama; Terumasa Yamada; Isao Miyashiro; Hiroaki Ohigashi; Masahiko Yano; Ken Kodama; Osamu Ishikawa; Kohei Murata; Hideoki Yokouchi; Yo Sasaki; Masao Kameyama; Shingi Imaoka
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 2.588

8.  Tumor doubling time of renal cell carcinoma measured by CT: collaboration of Japanese Society of Renal Cancer.

Authors:  Seiichiro Ozono; Noriomi Miyao; Tatsuo Igarashi; Ken Marumo; Hayakazu Nakazawa; Momokuni Fukuda; Tomoyasu Tsushima; Noriaki Tokuda; Juichi Kawamura; Masaru Murai
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Analysis of growth delay data: potential pitfalls.

Authors:  A C Begg
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1980-04

10.  The gross response of an experimental tumour to single doses of x-rays.

Authors:  R H Thomlinson; E A Craddock
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  20 in total

1.  Intracellular delivery system for antibody-Peptide drug conjugates.

Authors:  Geoffrey Y Berguig; Anthony J Convertine; Shani Frayo; Hanna B Kern; Erik Procko; Debashish Roy; Selvi Srinivasan; Daciana H Margineantu; Garrett Booth; Maria Corinna Palanca-Wessels; David Baker; David Hockenbery; Oliver W Press; Patrick S Stayton
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 11.454

2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR microscopy identifies regions of therapeutic response in a preclinical model of colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ergys Subashi; Yi Qi; G Allan Johnson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Design, analysis and reporting of tumor models.

Authors:  Robert Shaw; Sharon Miller; Jon Curwen; Mike Dymond
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 12.625

4.  Evaluation of treatment efficacy using a Bayesian mixture piecewise linear model of longitudinal biomarkers.

Authors:  Lili Zhao; Dai Feng; Brian Neelon; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Assessment of antitumor activity for tumor xenograft studies using exponential growth models.

Authors:  Jianrong Wu
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.051

6.  Autophagy promotes escape from phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibition in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Sarah R Hosford; Nicole A Traphagen; Kevin Shee; Eugene Demidenko; Stephanie Liu; Todd W Miller
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Dose-Dependent Growth Delay of Breast Cancer Xenografts in the Bone Marrow of Mice Treated with 223Ra: The Role of Bystander Effects and Their Potential for Therapy.

Authors:  Calvin N Leung; Brian S Canter; Didier Rajon; Tom A Bäck; J Christopher Fritton; Edouard I Azzam; Roger W Howell
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Strategically Timing Inhibition of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase to Maximize Therapeutic Index in Estrogen Receptor Alpha-Positive, PIK3CA-Mutant Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Sarah R Hosford; Lloye M Dillon; Kevin Shee; Stephanie C Liu; Jennifer R Bean; Laurent Salphati; Jodie Pang; Xiaolin Zhang; Michelle A Nannini; Eugene Demidenko; Darcy Bates; Lionel D Lewis; Jonathan D Marotti; Alan R Eastman; Todd W Miller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Assessment of the changes in 9L and C6 glioma pO2 by EPR oximetry as a prognostic indicator of differential response to radiotherapy.

Authors:  Huagang Hou; Sriram P Mupparaju; Jean P Lariviere; Sassan Hodge; Jiang Gui; Harold M Swartz; Nadeem Khan
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  Preclinical mouse solid tumour models: status quo, challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  Nicolas Gengenbacher; Mahak Singhal; Hellmut G Augustin
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 60.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.