Eugene Demidenko1. 1. Section of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA. eugened@dartmouth.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To review the existing endpoints of tumour growth delay assays in experimental radiobiology with an emphasis on their efficient estimation for statistically significant identification of the treatment effect. To mathematically define doubling time (DT), tumour-growth delay (TGD) and cancer-cell surviving fraction (SF) in vivo using exponential growth and regrowth models with tumour volume measurements obtained from animal experiments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A statistical model-based approach is used to define and efficiently estimate the three endpoints of tumour therapy in experimental cancer research. RESULTS: The log scale is advocated for plotting the tumour volume data and the respective analysis. Therefore, the geometric mean should be used to display the mean tumour volume data, and the group comparison should be a t-test for the log volume to comply with the Gaussian-distribution assumption. The relationship between cancer-cell SF, TGD and rate of growth is rigorously established. The widespread formula for cell kill is corrected; it has been rigorously shown that TGD is the difference between DTs. The software for the tumour growth delay analysis based on the mixed modeling approach with a complete set of instructions and example can be found on the author's webpage. CONCLUSIONS: The existing practice for TGD data analysis from animal experiments suffers from imprecision and large standard errors that yield low power and statistically insignificant treatment effect. This practice should be replaced with a model-based statistical analysis on the log scale.
PURPOSE: To review the existing endpoints of tumour growth delay assays in experimental radiobiology with an emphasis on their efficient estimation for statistically significant identification of the treatment effect. To mathematically define doubling time (DT), tumour-growth delay (TGD) and cancer-cell surviving fraction (SF) in vivo using exponential growth and regrowth models with tumour volume measurements obtained from animal experiments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A statistical model-based approach is used to define and efficiently estimate the three endpoints of tumour therapy in experimental cancer research. RESULTS: The log scale is advocated for plotting the tumour volume data and the respective analysis. Therefore, the geometric mean should be used to display the mean tumour volume data, and the group comparison should be a t-test for the log volume to comply with the Gaussian-distribution assumption. The relationship between cancer-cell SF, TGD and rate of growth is rigorously established. The widespread formula for cell kill is corrected; it has been rigorously shown that TGD is the difference between DTs. The software for the tumour growth delay analysis based on the mixed modeling approach with a complete set of instructions and example can be found on the author's webpage. CONCLUSIONS: The existing practice for TGD data analysis from animal experiments suffers from imprecision and large standard errors that yield low power and statistically insignificant treatment effect. This practice should be replaced with a model-based statistical analysis on the log scale.
Authors: Xiaodong Zhou; Brian W Pogue; Bin Chen; Eugene Demidenko; Rohan Joshi; Jack Hoopes; Tayyaba Hasan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Geoffrey Y Berguig; Anthony J Convertine; Shani Frayo; Hanna B Kern; Erik Procko; Debashish Roy; Selvi Srinivasan; Daciana H Margineantu; Garrett Booth; Maria Corinna Palanca-Wessels; David Baker; David Hockenbery; Oliver W Press; Patrick S Stayton Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Wei Yang; Sarah R Hosford; Nicole A Traphagen; Kevin Shee; Eugene Demidenko; Stephanie Liu; Todd W Miller Journal: FASEB J Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Calvin N Leung; Brian S Canter; Didier Rajon; Tom A Bäck; J Christopher Fritton; Edouard I Azzam; Roger W Howell Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Wei Yang; Sarah R Hosford; Lloye M Dillon; Kevin Shee; Stephanie C Liu; Jennifer R Bean; Laurent Salphati; Jodie Pang; Xiaolin Zhang; Michelle A Nannini; Eugene Demidenko; Darcy Bates; Lionel D Lewis; Jonathan D Marotti; Alan R Eastman; Todd W Miller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Huagang Hou; Sriram P Mupparaju; Jean P Lariviere; Sassan Hodge; Jiang Gui; Harold M Swartz; Nadeem Khan Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 2.841