Literature DB >> 16504761

Pretreatment photosensitizer dosimetry reduces variation in tumor response.

Xiaodong Zhou1, Brian W Pogue, Bin Chen, Eugene Demidenko, Rohan Joshi, Jack Hoopes, Tayyaba Hasan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compensate for photosensitizer uptake variation in photodynamic therapy (PDT), via control of delivered light dose through photodynamic dose calculation based on online dosimetry of photosensitizer in tissue before treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Photosensitizer verteporfin was quantified via multiple fluorescence microprobe measurements immediately before treatment. To compensate individual PDT treatments, photodynamic doses were calculated on an individual animal basis, by matching the light delivered to provide an equal photosensitizer dose multiplied by light dose. This was completed for the lower quartile, median, and upper quartile of the photosensitizer distribution. PDT-induced tumor responses were evaluated by the tumor regrowth assay.
RESULTS: Verteporfin uptake varied considerably among tumors and within a tumor. The coefficient of variation in the surviving fraction was found significantly decreased in groups compensated to the lower quartile (CL-PDT), the median (CM-PDT), and the upper quartile (CU-PDT) of photosensitizer distribution. The CL-PDT group was significantly less effective compared with NC-PDT (Noncompensated PDT), CM-PDT, and CU-PDT treatments. No significant difference in effectiveness was observed between NC-PDT, CM-PDT, and CU-PDT treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This research suggests that accurate quantification of tissue photosensitizer levels and subsequent adjustment of light dose will allow for reduced subject variation and improved treatment consistency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16504761     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  29 in total

1.  Tumor vascular microenvironment determines responsiveness to photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Amanda L Maas; Shirron L Carter; E Paul Wileyto; Joann Miller; Min Yuan; Guoqiang Yu; Amy C Durham; Theresa M Busch
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Imaging and photodynamic therapy: mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization.

Authors:  Jonathan P Celli; Bryan Q Spring; Imran Rizvi; Conor L Evans; Kimberley S Samkoe; Sarika Verma; Brian W Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  A Comparison of Dose Metrics to Predict Local Tumor Control for Photofrin-mediated Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Haixia Qiu; Michele M Kim; Rozhin Penjweini; Jarod C Finlay; Theresa M Busch; Tianhao Wang; Wensheng Guo; Keith A Cengel; Charles B Simone; Eli Glatstein; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 4.  Optical Imaging, Photodynamic Therapy and Optically Triggered Combination Treatments.

Authors:  Srivalleesha Mallidi; Bryan Q Spring; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

5.  Measuring the Physiologic Properties of Oral Lesions Receiving Fractionated Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Shannon M Gallagher-Colombo; Harry Quon; Kelly M Malloy; Peter H Ahn; Keith A Cengel; Charles B Simone; Ara A Chalian; Bert W O'Malley; Gregory S Weinstein; Timothy C Zhu; Mary E Putt; Jarod C Finlay; Theresa M Busch
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 6.  Preoperative mapping of nonmelanoma skin cancer using spatial frequency domain and ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Daniel J Rohrbach; Daniel Muffoletto; Jonathan Huihui; Rolf Saager; Kenneth Keymel; Anne Paquette; Janet Morgan; Nathalie Zeitouni; Ulas Sunar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Choline PET for monitoring early tumor response to photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Baowei Fei; Hesheng Wang; Chunying Wu; Song-mao Chiu
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Low-dose methotrexate enhances aminolevulinate-based photodynamic therapy in skin carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Sanjay Anand; Golara Honari; Tayyaba Hasan; Paul Elson; Edward V Maytin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  PDT dose parameters impact tumoricidal durability and cell death pathways in a 3D ovarian cancer model.

Authors:  Imran Rizvi; Sriram Anbil; Nermina Alagic; Jonathan Celli; Jonathan P Celli; Lei Zak Zheng; Akilan Palanisami; Michael D Glidden; Brian W Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.421

10.  Focal treatment of prostate cancer with vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Scott E Eggener; Jonathan A Coleman
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2008-10-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.