PURPOSE: To compensate for photosensitizer uptake variation in photodynamic therapy (PDT), via control of delivered light dose through photodynamic dose calculation based on online dosimetry of photosensitizer in tissue before treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Photosensitizer verteporfin was quantified via multiple fluorescence microprobe measurements immediately before treatment. To compensate individual PDT treatments, photodynamic doses were calculated on an individual animal basis, by matching the light delivered to provide an equal photosensitizer dose multiplied by light dose. This was completed for the lower quartile, median, and upper quartile of the photosensitizer distribution. PDT-induced tumor responses were evaluated by the tumor regrowth assay. RESULTS: Verteporfin uptake varied considerably among tumors and within a tumor. The coefficient of variation in the surviving fraction was found significantly decreased in groups compensated to the lower quartile (CL-PDT), the median (CM-PDT), and the upper quartile (CU-PDT) of photosensitizer distribution. The CL-PDT group was significantly less effective compared with NC-PDT (Noncompensated PDT), CM-PDT, and CU-PDT treatments. No significant difference in effectiveness was observed between NC-PDT, CM-PDT, and CU-PDT treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: This research suggests that accurate quantification of tissue photosensitizer levels and subsequent adjustment of light dose will allow for reduced subject variation and improved treatment consistency.
PURPOSE: To compensate for photosensitizer uptake variation in photodynamic therapy (PDT), via control of delivered light dose through photodynamic dose calculation based on online dosimetry of photosensitizer in tissue before treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Photosensitizer verteporfin was quantified via multiple fluorescence microprobe measurements immediately before treatment. To compensate individual PDT treatments, photodynamic doses were calculated on an individual animal basis, by matching the light delivered to provide an equal photosensitizer dose multiplied by light dose. This was completed for the lower quartile, median, and upper quartile of the photosensitizer distribution. PDT-induced tumor responses were evaluated by the tumor regrowth assay. RESULTS:Verteporfin uptake varied considerably among tumors and within a tumor. The coefficient of variation in the surviving fraction was found significantly decreased in groups compensated to the lower quartile (CL-PDT), the median (CM-PDT), and the upper quartile (CU-PDT) of photosensitizer distribution. The CL-PDT group was significantly less effective compared with NC-PDT (Noncompensated PDT), CM-PDT, and CU-PDT treatments. No significant difference in effectiveness was observed between NC-PDT, CM-PDT, and CU-PDT treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: This research suggests that accurate quantification of tissue photosensitizer levels and subsequent adjustment of light dose will allow for reduced subject variation and improved treatment consistency.
Authors: Amanda L Maas; Shirron L Carter; E Paul Wileyto; Joann Miller; Min Yuan; Guoqiang Yu; Amy C Durham; Theresa M Busch Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jonathan P Celli; Bryan Q Spring; Imran Rizvi; Conor L Evans; Kimberley S Samkoe; Sarika Verma; Brian W Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2010-05-12 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Haixia Qiu; Michele M Kim; Rozhin Penjweini; Jarod C Finlay; Theresa M Busch; Tianhao Wang; Wensheng Guo; Keith A Cengel; Charles B Simone; Eli Glatstein; Timothy C Zhu Journal: Photochem Photobiol Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 3.421
Authors: Shannon M Gallagher-Colombo; Harry Quon; Kelly M Malloy; Peter H Ahn; Keith A Cengel; Charles B Simone; Ara A Chalian; Bert W O'Malley; Gregory S Weinstein; Timothy C Zhu; Mary E Putt; Jarod C Finlay; Theresa M Busch Journal: Photochem Photobiol Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 3.421
Authors: Imran Rizvi; Sriram Anbil; Nermina Alagic; Jonathan Celli; Jonathan P Celli; Lei Zak Zheng; Akilan Palanisami; Michael D Glidden; Brian W Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan Journal: Photochem Photobiol Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 3.421