Literature DB >> 2014862

Evaluating needle exchange: do distributed needles come back?

J Guydish1, G Clark, D Garcia, M Downing, P Case, J L Sorensen.   

Abstract

We employed capture-recapture methods as a strategy for evaluating needle exchange. Needles distributed by the exchange at two time periods were marked with color coded bands indicating the date and site of distribution. Half of the marked needles (2,068/4,239) returned within two weeks of distribution, and 61 percent (2,593/4,239) returned during the study period. The rate of return for stationary exchange sites (63 percent) was greater than that for roving/mobile sites (51 percent; chi 2 = 28.6, p less than .001). Of all needles returned, 87 percent (2,248/2,593) returned to the site of original distribution.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2014862      PMCID: PMC1405085          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.81.5.617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  2 in total

1.  Risk reduction among intravenous drug users in Amsterdam under the influence of AIDS.

Authors:  J A van den Hoek; H J van Haastrecht; R A Coutinho
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The impact of the needle and syringe-exchange programme in Amsterdam on injecting risk behaviour.

Authors:  C Hartgers; E C Buning; G W van Santen; A D Verster; R A Coutinho
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.177

  2 in total
  6 in total

1.  Operational issues in syringe exchanges: the New York City tagging alternative study.

Authors:  D Paone; D C Des Jarlais; S Caloir; J Clark; B Jose
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1995-04

2.  Satellite exchange in the Baltimore Needle Exchange Program.

Authors:  T W Valente; R K Foreman; B Junge; D Vlahov
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Needle-exchange participation, effectiveness, and policy: syringe relay, gender, and the paradox of public health.

Authors:  T W Valente; R K Foreman; B Junge; D Vlahov
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  A comparison of syringe disposal practices among injection drug users in a city with versus a city without needle and syringe programs.

Authors:  Hansel E Tookes; Alex H Kral; Lynn D Wenger; Gabriel A Cardenas; Alexis N Martinez; Recinda L Sherman; Margaret Pereyra; David W Forrest; Marlene LaLota; Lisa R Metsch
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Return Rates for Needle Exchange Programs: A Common Criticism Answered.

Authors:  Kate Ksobiech
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2004-04-19

6.  Assessing and improving needle exchange programs: gaps and problems in the literature.

Authors:  Kate Ksobiech
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2004-04-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.