Literature DB >> 20146771

Pro-environmental behavior: rational choice meets moral motivation.

Rama Mohana R Turaga1, Richard B Howarth, Mark E Borsuk.   

Abstract

The determinants of individual behaviors that provide shared environmental benefits are a longstanding theme in social science research. Alternative behavioral models yield markedly different predictions and policy recommendations. This paper reviews and compares the literatures from two disciplines that appear to be moving toward a degree of convergence. In social psychology, moral theories of pro-environmental behavior have focused on the influence of personal moral norms while recognizing that external factors, such as costs and incentives, ultimately limit the strength of the norm-behavior relationship. Rational choice models, such as the theory of planned behavior in social psychology and the theories of voluntary provision of public goods in economics, have sought to incorporate the effects of personal norms and to measure their importance in explaining behaviors, such as recycling and the demand for green products. This paper explores the relationship between these approaches and their implications for the theory and practice of ecological economics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20146771     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05163.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  11 in total

Review 1.  Health and sustainability co-benefits of eating behaviors: Towards a science of dietary eco-wellness.

Authors:  Bruce Barrett
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-06-27

2.  The Social Utility of Ambivalence: Being Ambivalent on Controversial Issues Is Recognized as Competence.

Authors:  Vincent Pillaud; Nicoletta Cavazza; Fabrizio Butera
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-22

3.  Hunt-Vitell's General Theory of Marketing Ethics Predicts "Attitude-Behaviour" Gap in Pro-environmental Domain.

Authors:  Laura Zaikauskaitė; Gemma Butler; Nurul F S Helmi; Charlotte L Robinson; Luke Treglown; Dimitrios Tsivrikos; Joseph T Devlin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-02

4.  Going Green Is Exhausting for Dark Personalities but Beneficial for the Light Ones: An Experience Sampling Study That Examines the Subjectivity of Pro-environmental Behavior.

Authors:  Jana Sophie Kesenheimer; Tobias Greitemeyer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-14

5.  Factors Affecting Green Purchase Intention: A Perspective of Ethical Decision Making.

Authors:  Ziyuan Tian; Xixiang Sun; Jianguo Wang; Weihuan Su; Gen Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Simulating irrational human behavior to prevent resource depletion.

Authors:  Anna Sircova; Fariba Karimi; Evgeny N Osin; Sungmin Lee; Petter Holme; Daniel Strömbom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Testing the psychometric properties of the Environmental Attitudes Inventory on undergraduate students in the Arab context: A test-retest approach.

Authors:  Entesar Ali AlMenhali; Khalizani Khalid; Shilpa Iyanna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Dispositional orientation to the present and future and its role in pro-environmental behavior and sustainability.

Authors:  Marc Wittmann; Anna Sircova
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-10-26

9.  Envy and Environmental Decision Making: The Mediating Role of Self-Control.

Authors:  Xinni Wei; Feng Yu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Determinants of pro-environmental behavior among excessive smartphone usage children and moderate smartphone usage children in Taiwan.

Authors:  Wei-Ta Fang; Eric Ng; Shu-Mei Liu; Yi-Te Chiang; Mei-Chuan Chang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.