| Literature DB >> 20145614 |
T Nakanishi1, S Chumsri, N Khakpour, A H Brodie, B Leyland-Jones, A W Hamburger, D D Ross, A M Burger.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The expression of side-population (SP) cells and their relation to tumour-initiating cells (T-ICs) have been insufficiently studied in breast cancer (BC). We therefore evaluated primary cell cultures derived from patients and a panel of human BC cell lines with luminal- or basal-molecular signatures for the presence of SP and BC stem cell markers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20145614 PMCID: PMC2833247 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605553
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
SP cells and HER2 expression in human breast cancer cells
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MCF10A | − | Bb | 1 | 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) | 2 | 0.70±0.13 |
| MCF-7 | + | Lu | 7 | 0.39±0.15 | 9 | 40.2±11.8 |
| MCF-7/vector | + | Lu | — | 0.29±0.21 | — | ND |
| MCF-7/TAM1 | + | Lu | 10 | 0.87±0.27 | 10 | 40.9±6.30 |
| MCF-7/HER2-18 | + | Lu | 16 | 3.38±0.27 | 17 | 161.4±37.4 |
| HC7 | + | Lu | 18 | 7.31±0.55 | 18 | 170.3 (97.48, 247.16) |
| T47D | + | Lu | 4 | 0.15±0.08 | 5 | 19.2±6.19 |
| Ac1 | + | Lu | 11 | 1.05±0.32 | 15 | 125.2±40.5 |
| Ac1ANAR | + | Lu | 17 | 6.00±0.39 | 14 | 84.9±25.8 |
| SKBR3 | − | Lu | 12 | 1.41±0.27 | 16 | 156.1±83.88 |
| BT-20 | − | Ba | − | 0.10±0.04 | − | ND |
| BT-20/pcDNA3 | − | Ba | 5 | 0.17±0.08 | 4 | 7.30±1.70 |
| BT-20/HER2 | − | Ba | 8 | 0.76±0.33 | 12 | 48.5±8.27 |
| MDA-MB-468 | − | Ba | 1 | 0.00±0.00 | 1 | 0.00±0.00 |
| MDA-MB-231/pcDNA3 | − | Bb | 1 | 0.00±0.00 | 3 | 1.50±0.84 |
| MDA-MB231/HER2 | − | Bb | 6 | 0.32±0.12 | 13 | 82.6±14.5 |
| GCC-BC1 | + | Lu-like | 14 | 2.92±1.26 | 7 | 31.6±9.09 |
| GCC-BC2 | + | Lu-like | 15 | 3.15±1.97 | 11 | 45.0±8.32 |
| GCC-BC3 | + | Lu-like | 9 | 0.85±0.33 | 6 | 25.4±8.39 |
| GCC-BC4 | + | Lu-like | 13 | 2.80±0.25 | 8 | 37.6±10.8 |
Abbreviations: ANAR=anastrozole resistant; TAM=tamoxifen resistant; ND=not done; MFI=mean fluorescence intensity; SP=side population; HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ERα=estrogen receptor-α.
Each value represents the mean value of three independent experiments with±s.e. When an experiment was performed only twice, each value is shown in parentheses. A rank of 1 represents the lowest value for SP and HER2 expression.
Figure 1Association of stem cell markers with transcriptional classification of breast cancer (BC) cells. (A) The side-population (SP) cells were analysed in MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, and GCC-BC4 cells by Hoechst staining and flow cytometry. To determine CD44+/CD24− expression, cells were incubated with anti-CD44 (conjugated with allophycocyanin (APC)) and anti-CD24 (conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)), or both isotype controls. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1+ (ALDH1+) was analysed by measuring cellular fluorescence of bodipy-aminoacetate (BAAA) in the presence or absence of DEAB, a specific inhibitor for ALDH1. Percentages of cell fractions positive for stem cell markers are shown in the quadrants of the graphs containing the relevant cell population. Each plot is representative of at least three independent experiments. (B) Analysis of breast tumour-initiating cells (T-ICs) defined as SP, CD44+/CD24−, or ALDH1+ cell fractions. Twenty-five different human BC cell lines were evaluated. Average values of each surrogate markers for T-ICs in a given cell line were plotted in dot plots. Lu BC includes 11 cell lines: MCF-7, MCF-7/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-18, MCF-7/vector, HC-7, SKBR3, T47D, MCF-7/TAM1, MCF-7 CA, MCF-7 CA/LTLT (Sabnis ), Ac1, and Ac1/ANAR; Ba BC includes four lines: BT-20, BT-20/pcDNA3, BT-20/HER2, and MDA-MB468; Bb BC includes six lines: MCF10A, MDA-MB231, MDA-MB231/pcDNA3, MDA-MB231/HER2, Hs578T, and Hs578Ti8 (Hughes ). Because of a lack of transcriptional profiling data for the patient-derived BC lines, these cells were classified as luminal-like and include GCC-BC1, -BC2, -BC3, and -BC4. The median percentage values are indicated by a horizontal bar. Lu, Luminal: Ba, Basal A; Bb, Basal B; Pt, Patient-derived primary cell line. *P<0.01 vs Lu BC; †P<0.01 vs Pt BC, by Wilcoxon test. (C) Clonogenic assay for representative cells from panel B. The % plating efficiency (PE) representing colony-forming units in the whole cell population per 5000 seeded cells was highest in cell lines with large SP, such as MCF-7/HER2-18, and lowest in those BC cells lacking an SP (MDA-MB-468). The data shown represent the mean of three independent experiments.
Stem cell populations in breast cancer cells
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| MCF-7 | Lu | 0.39±0.15 | 4.80±0.49 | 0.33±0.19 |
| MCF-7/HER2-18 | Lu | 3.38±0.27** | 7.36±3.03* | 1.17±0.27* |
| MCF-7/TAM1 | Lu | 0.87±0.27 | 20.25±0.23** | 0.82±0.26* |
| Ac1/ANAR | Lu | 6.00±0.39** | 0.875±0.8 | 0.45±0.07 |
| MDA-MBA-468 | Ba | 0.00±0.00 | 0.29±0.17 | 7.56±1.26 |
| MDA-MB-231 | Bb | 0.00±0.00 | 80.3±3.86 | 4.42±0.34 |
| GCC-BC4 | Lu-like | 2.02±0.95 | 1.68±0.94 | 1.02±0.36 |
Abbreviations: SP=side population; ALDH=aldehyde dehydrogenase; ANAR=anastrozole resistant.
*P<0.01 and **P<0.05 vs MCF-7 by Student's t-test.
Tumour-initiating cell markers are shown as mean values±s.e. Experiments were independently repeated for three times.
Figure 2Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression and side-population (SP) cells: (A) The SP was analysed in various breast cancer (BC) cell lines. After staining with H33342, Hoechst Blue and Hoechst Green were measured using a BD LSR I. The cell population that disappeared in the presence of 1 μM of Ko143 was identified as SP cells. (B) A Spearman's rank correlation test was performed for the BC cell lines listed in Table 1. The BC cell lines are ranked #1 for being highest in HER2 expression or SP population and #18 for being the lowest, and then the rank for HER2 expression is plotted to the rank for SP population. Statistical analysis shows a significant correlation between the ranks (r2=0.75, P=0.0003). (C) HER2 and breast cancer-resistance protein (BCRP) in BC cell lines were detected by western blot analysis. BCRP and HER2 were detected by immunoblotting with anti-BCRP and anti-HER2/neu antibodies. The blot was then probed with anti-β actin as a loading control. BCRP can show two distinct bands (antibody from Sigma #B7185) due to differences in glycosylation. (D) SP analysis in drug-resistant cells. SP was increased in hormone therapy-resistant BC cells, MCF-7/TAM and Ac1/ANAR. (E) ALDH1 analysis in hormone-resistant BC cells. MCF-7/TAM1 and Ac1ANAR contain a ALDH+ population (top panel). Data depicted in A–E are representative of at least three individual analyses.
Figure 3Characteristics of side-population (SP) cells. (A) Characteristics of SP in MCF-7/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-18 breast cancer (BC) cells. The expressions of ERα (fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) green, left panel) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) (TRITC red, middle panel) are shown by immunofluorescence staining; whole cell population cells are compared with SP cells. The right panel shows the merged images using 4′-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) counter staining (blue) to contrast the nuclei. Control cells were probed with mouse and rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnolog Inc.). Results represent three independent experiments. White bars represent 15 μm. (B) The expressions of ERα and IGFBP7 were also compared in tumours established from the whole cell population or from the SP in non-obese diabetic severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mice. Shown are expression levels of the protein in small (100 mm3) and large (1500 mm3) size grafts arising from 500 SP cells from MCF-7/HER2-18 in NOD/SCID mice. Results represent three independent experiments. Black bars represent 15 μm.
Figure 4Effect of inhibition of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/HER3 on side-population (SP) cells. (A) Effects of HER2 inhibition by AG825 on SP in MCF7/HER2-18 cells. MCF-7/HER2-18 cells were treated with dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) (vehicle), or with 50 or 100 μM AG825 for 72 h. Thereafter, SP cells were analysed as described. Top panels show typical SP cell analysis with % SP in the lower right corner of each panel and the bar graph summarises the effects of HER2 inhibitor on SP in MCF-7/HER2-18 cells. Each bar represents the mean value of at least three independent experiments with s.e.m. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 by Student's t-test. (B) Effect of AG825 on SP cells in GCC-BC4 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (vehicle), or with 10 or 100 μM of AG825 for 72 h. The SP cells were analysed by measuring Hoechst Blue and Green fluorescence on a flow cytometer. Experiments were repeated at least three times (% SP is indicated in the lower right corner). (C) Effects of HER2 inhibition by trastuzumab on the SP in MCF7/HER2-18 cells. (D) Effect of trastuzumab on SP cells in GCC-BC4. K0143 was used as a specific inhibitor of SP cells expressing breast cancer-resistance protein (BCRP) and to set the appropriate gates for the detection of the SPs. (E) Comparison of HER2, phosphorylated HER2, HER3, phosphorylated HER3, AKT, phosphorylated AKT, and BCRP expression in MCF-7/HER2-18 and GCC-BC4 cells after treatment with the HER2 inhibitor AG825 at different doses (as indicated) and with trastuzumab (160 μg ml–1) for 72 h. Experiments were repeated at least three times. Absolute intensities of each signal were quantified using NIH Image J software, and then a relative intensity value was obtained by dividing the absolute intensity of a given protein by that of β actin. Signal quantifications for each lane of the western blots are shown as bar graphs below.
NOD/SCID mouse repopulation assay
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| MCF-7/HER2-18 | 100 | 11/14 | 0/7 | 0/5 |
| 500 | 10/13 | 0/9 | 0/8 | |
| 1000 | 8/8 | 0/2 | 2/3 | |
| GCC-SC-4/Patient | 100 | 4/4 | 1/4 | — |
| 500 | 4/4 | 0/4 | — | |
| Total | 37/43 | 1/26 | 2/16 | |
Abbreviations: NOD/SCID=non-obese diabetic severe combined immunodeficiency; SP=side population.
Comparison within groups: control, P>0.7; AG825, P<0.001; trastuzumab, P=0.02.
Comparison between groups: control vs AG825, P<0.001; Control vs trastuzumab, P=0.002. The analysis of variance F-test was used.