Literature DB >> 20144631

Pharmacological evidence that both cognitive memory and habit formation contribute to within-session learning of concurrent visual discriminations.

Janita Turchi1, Bryan Devan, Pingbo Yin, Emmalynn Sigrist, Mortimer Mishkin.   

Abstract

The monkey's ability to learn a set of visual discriminations presented concurrently just once a day on successive days (24-h ITI task) is based on habit formation, which is known to rely on a visuo-striatal circuit and to be independent of visuo-rhinal circuits that support one-trial memory. Consistent with this dissociation, we recently reported that performance on the 24-h ITI task is impaired by a striatal-function blocking agent, the dopaminergic antagonist haloperidol, and not by a rhinal-function blocking agent, the muscarinic cholinergic antagonist scopolamine. In the present study, monkeys were trained on a short-ITI form of concurrent visual discrimination learning, one in which a set of stimulus pairs is repeated not only across daily sessions but also several times within each session (in this case, at about 4-min ITIs). Asymptotic discrimination learning rates in the non-drug condition were reduced by half, from approximately 11 trials/pair on the 24-h ITI task to approximately 5 trials/pair on the 4-min ITI task, and this faster learning was impaired by systemic injections of either haloperidol or scopolamine. The results suggest that in the version of concurrent discrimination learning used here, the short ITIs within a session recruit both visuo-rhinal and visuo-striatal circuits, and that the final performance level is driven by both cognitive memory and habit formation working in concert.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20144631      PMCID: PMC2900424          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  30 in total

1.  Contrasting effects on discrimination learning after hippocampal lesions and conjoint hippocampal-caudate lesions in monkeys.

Authors:  E Teng; L Stefanacci; L R Squire; S M Zola
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. I. Temporal lobe afferents.

Authors:  G Van Hoesen; D N Pandya
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-09-12       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex.

Authors:  G E Alexander; M R DeLong; P L Strick
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Dissociation of the effects of inferior temporal and limbic lesions on object discrimination learning with 24-h intertrial intervals.

Authors:  R R Phillips; B L Malamut; J Bachevalier; M Mishkin
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Effects of medial temporal lesions on visual discrimination performance.

Authors:  R E Correll; W B Scoville
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1965-10

6.  Three-dimensional representation and cortical projection topography of the nucleus basalis (Ch4) in the macaque: concurrent demonstration of choline acetyltransferase and retrograde transport with a stabilized tetramethylbenzidine method for horseradish peroxidase.

Authors:  M M Mesulam; E J Mufson; B H Wainer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-03-05       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Neural inputs into the nucleus basalis of the substantia innominata (Ch4) in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M M Mesulam; E J Mufson
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Monkeys with combined amygdalo-hippocampal lesions succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hour intertrial intervals.

Authors:  B L Malamut; R C Saunders; M Mishkin
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 9.  Competition among multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies.

Authors:  Russell A Poldrack; Mark G Packard
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Memory impairments following restricted medial thalamic lesions in monkeys.

Authors:  J P Aggleton; M Mishkin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Reward improves long-term retention of a motor memory through induction of offline memory gains.

Authors:  Mitsunari Abe; Heidi Schambra; Eric M Wassermann; Dave Luckenbaugh; Nicolas Schweighofer; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Manipulating memory efficacy affects the behavioral and neural profiles of deterministic learning and decision-making.

Authors:  Joshua J Tremel; Daniella M Ortiz; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Reversal learning and dopamine: a bayesian perspective.

Authors:  Vincent D Costa; Valery L Tran; Janita Turchi; Bruno B Averbeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural signatures of experience-based improvements in deterministic decision-making.

Authors:  Joshua J Tremel; Patryk A Laurent; David A Wolk; Mark E Wheeler; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Advanced Parkinson's disease effect on goal-directed and habitual processes involved in visuomotor associative learning.

Authors:  Fadila Hadj-Bouziane; Isabelle Benatru; Andrea Brovelli; Hélène Klinger; Stéphane Thobois; Emmanuel Broussolle; Driss Boussaoud; Martine Meunier
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.