BACKGROUND: Treating hyperglycemia promotes better outcomes among inpatients. Knowledge deficits about management of inpatient diabetes are prevalent among resident physicians, which may affect the care of a substantial number of these patients. METHODS: A computer-based training (CBT) curriculum on inpatient diabetes and hyperglycemia was developed and implemented for use by resident physicians and focuses on several aspects of the management of inpatient diabetes and hyperglycemia: (1) review of importance of inpatient glucose control, (2) overview of institution-specific data, (3) triaging and initial admission actions for diabetes or hyperglycemia, (4) overview of pharmacologic management, (5) insulin-dosing calculations and ordering simulations, (6) review of existing policies and procedures, and (7) discharge planning. The curriculum was first provided as a series of lectures, then formatted and placed on the institutional intranet as a CBT program. RESULTS: Residents began using the inpatient CBT in September 2008. By August 2009, a total of 29 residents had participated in CBT: 8 in family medicine, 12 in internal medicine, and 9 in general surgery. Most of the 29 residents confirmed that module content met stated objectives, considered the information valuable to their inpatient practices, and believed that the quality of the online modules met expectations. The majority reported that the modules took just the right amount of time to complete (typically 30 min each). CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in inpatient diabetes care requires continuous educational efforts. The CBT format and curriculum content were well accepted by the resident physicians. Ongoing assessment must determine whether resident practice patterns are influenced by such training.
BACKGROUND: Treating hyperglycemia promotes better outcomes among inpatients. Knowledge deficits about management of inpatient diabetes are prevalent among resident physicians, which may affect the care of a substantial number of these patients. METHODS: A computer-based training (CBT) curriculum on inpatient diabetes and hyperglycemia was developed and implemented for use by resident physicians and focuses on several aspects of the management of inpatient diabetes and hyperglycemia: (1) review of importance of inpatient glucose control, (2) overview of institution-specific data, (3) triaging and initial admission actions for diabetes or hyperglycemia, (4) overview of pharmacologic management, (5) insulin-dosing calculations and ordering simulations, (6) review of existing policies and procedures, and (7) discharge planning. The curriculum was first provided as a series of lectures, then formatted and placed on the institutional intranet as a CBT program. RESULTS: Residents began using the inpatient CBT in September 2008. By August 2009, a total of 29 residents had participated in CBT: 8 in family medicine, 12 in internal medicine, and 9 in general surgery. Most of the 29 residents confirmed that module content met stated objectives, considered the information valuable to their inpatient practices, and believed that the quality of the online modules met expectations. The majority reported that the modules took just the right amount of time to complete (typically 30 min each). CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in inpatient diabetes care requires continuous educational efforts. The CBT format and curriculum content were well accepted by the resident physicians. Ongoing assessment must determine whether resident practice patterns are influenced by such training.
Authors: Curtiss B Cook; Kimberly A Jameson; Zachary C Hartsell; Mary E Boyle; Brenda J Leonhardi; Marci Farquhar-Snow; Karen A Beer Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Etie S Moghissi; Mary T Korytkowski; Monica DiNardo; Daniel Einhorn; Richard Hellman; Irl B Hirsch; Silvio E Inzucchi; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; M Sue Kirkman; Guillermo E Umpierrez Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Susan S Braithwaite; Michelle Magee; John M Sharretts; Jeffrey L Schnipper; Alpesh Amin; Gregory Maynard Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Laura A D Knecht; Susanne M Gauthier; Janna C Castro; Ronald E Schmidt; Michael D Whitaker; Richard S Zimmerman; Kenneth J Mishark; Curtiss B Cook Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Curtiss B Cook; Mary E Boyle; Nancy S Cisar; Victoria Miller-Cage; Peggy Bourgeois; Lori R Roust; Steven A Smith; Richard S Zimmerman Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Curtiss B Cook; Karen M Seifert; Bryan P Hull; Michael J Hovan; Joseph C Charles; Victoria Miller-Cage; Mary E Boyle; Jana K Harris; Jan M Magallanez; Stephanie D Littman Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Miguel Munoz; Peter Pronovost; Joanne Dintzis; Theresa Kemmerer; Nae-Yuh Wang; Yi-Ting Chang; Leigh Efird; Sean M Berenholtz; Sherita Hill Golden Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2012-05
Authors: Nestoras Mathioudakis; Peter J Pronovost; Sara E Cosgrove; Daniel Hager; Sherita Hill Golden Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2015-07
Authors: Rebecca D Wilson; Marilyn Bailey; Mary E Boyle; Karen M Seifert; Karla Y Cortez; Leslie J Baker; Michael J Hovan; Jan Stepanek; Curtiss B Cook Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2013-11-01
Authors: Adrienne A Nassar; Brenda J Partlow; Mary E Boyle; Janna C Castro; Peggy B Bourgeois; Curtiss B Cook Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2010-07-01
Authors: Kathryn E Coan; Andrew B Schlinkert; Brandon R Beck; Danielle J Haakinson; Janna C Castro; Heidi A Apsey; Richard T Schlinkert; Curtiss B Cook Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2013-07-01