Literature DB >> 20144324

Validation of a multimarker model for assessing risk of type 2 diabetes from a five-year prospective study of 6784 Danish people (Inter99).

Mickey Urdea1, Janice Kolberg, Judith Wilber, Robert Gerwien, Edward Moler, Michael Rowe, Paul Jorgensen, Torben Hansen, Oluf Pedersen, Torben Jørgensen, Knut Borch-Johnsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improved identification of subjects at high risk for development of type 2 diabetes would allow preventive interventions to be targeted toward individuals most likely to benefit. In previous research, predictive biomarkers were identified and used to develop multivariate models to assess an individual's risk of developing diabetes. Here we describe the training and validation of the PreDx Diabetes Risk Score (DRS) model in a clinical laboratory setting using baseline serum samples from subjects in the Inter99 cohort, a population-based primary prevention study of cardiovascular disease.
METHODS: Among 6784 subjects free of diabetes at baseline, 215 subjects progressed to diabetes (converters) during five years of follow-up. A nested case-control study was performed using serum samples from 202 converters and 597 randomly selected nonconverters. Samples were randomly assigned to equally sized training and validation sets. Seven biomarkers were measured using assays developed for use in a clinical reference laboratory.
RESULTS: The PreDx DRS model performed better on the training set (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.837) than fasting plasma glucose alone (AUC = 0.779). When applied to the sequestered validation set, the PreDx DRS showed the same performance (AUC = 0.838), thus validating the model. This model had a better AUC than any other single measure from a fasting sample. Moreover, the model provided further risk stratification among high-risk subpopulations with impaired fasting glucose or metabolic syndrome.
CONCLUSIONS: The PreDx DRS provides the absolute risk of diabetes conversion in five years for subjects identified to be "at risk" using the clinical factors. Copyright 2009 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20144324      PMCID: PMC2769937          DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  15 in total

1.  Hyperlipidaemia and primary prevention of coronary heart disease: are the right patients being treated?

Authors:  S Ramachandran; M H Labib
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Risk       Date:  2000-08

2.  A randomized non-pharmacological intervention study for prevention of ischaemic heart disease: baseline results Inter99.

Authors:  Torben Jørgensen; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Troels F Thomsen; Hans Ibsen; Charlotte Glümer; Charlotta Pisinger
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2003-10

Review 3.  Etiology of insulin resistance.

Authors:  Kitt Falk Petersen; Gerald I Shulman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Type 2 diabetes-a matter of beta-cell life and death?

Authors:  Christopher J Rhodes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Insulin resistance is a poor predictor of type 2 diabetes in individuals with no family history of disease.

Authors:  Allison B Goldfine; Clara Bouche; Robert A Parker; Caroline Kim; Amy Kerivan; J Stuart Soeldner; Blaise C Martin; James H Warram; C Ronald Kahn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man.

Authors:  D R Matthews; J P Hosker; A S Rudenski; B A Naylor; D F Treacher; R C Turner
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 7.  Impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glycaemia: the current status on definition and intervention.

Authors:  N Unwin; J Shaw; P Zimmet; K G M M Alberti
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  Role of glucose and insulin resistance in development of type 2 diabetes mellitus: results of a 25-year follow-up study.

Authors:  B C Martin; J H Warram; A S Krolewski; R N Bergman; J S Soeldner; C R Kahn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-10-17       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Development of a type 2 diabetes risk model from a panel of serum biomarkers from the Inter99 cohort.

Authors:  Janice A Kolberg; Torben Jørgensen; Robert W Gerwien; Sarah Hamren; Michael P McKenna; Edward Moler; Michael W Rowe; Mickey S Urdea; Xiaomei M Xu; Torben Hansen; Oluf Pedersen; Knut Borch-Johnsen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Family physician's knowledge, beliefs, and self-reported practice patterns regarding hyperlipidemia: a National Research Network (NRN) survey.

Authors:  Charles B Eaton; James M Galliher; Patrick E McBride; Aaron J Bonham; Jennifer A Kappus; John Hickner
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

View more
  15 in total

1.  A novel fasting blood test for insulin resistance and prediabetes.

Authors:  Jeff Cobb; Walter Gall; Klaus-Peter Adam; Pamela Nakhle; Eric Button; James Hathorn; Kay Lawton; Michael Milburn; Regis Perichon; Matthew Mitchell; Andrea Natali; Ele Ferrannini
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-01

2.  Towards the Future Development of an Electrochemical Continuous Multimarker Biosensor for Enhanced Glycemic Management.

Authors:  Aldin Malkoc; Chi Lin; David Probst; Mackenzie Honikel; Jeffrey T La Belle
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-05-10

3.  The personalized medicine for diabetes meeting summary report.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

4.  A better index of body adiposity.

Authors:  Richard N Bergman; Darko Stefanovski; Thomas A Buchanan; Anne E Sumner; James C Reynolds; Nancy G Sebring; Anny H Xiang; Richard M Watanabe
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Biomarker models as surrogates for the disposition index in the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study.

Authors:  S M Watkins; M W Rowe; J A Kolberg; L E Wagenknecht; R N Bergman
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.359

6.  Performance of a multi-marker diabetes risk score in the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS), a multi-ethnic US cohort.

Authors:  Michael W Rowe; Richard N Bergman; Lynne E Wagenknecht; Janice A Kolberg
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.876

7.  Measurement of Lens Autofluorescence Can Distinguish Subjects With Diabetes From Those Without.

Authors:  Frederick Cahn; John Burd; Keith Ignotz; Shardendu Mishra
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-01

8.  Use of the DISST model to estimate the HOMA and Matsuda indexes using only a basal insulin assay.

Authors:  Shaun M Davidson; Paul D Docherty; J Geoffrey Chase
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-12

9.  The American Diabetes Association's 57th annual advanced postgraduate course: diabetes risk, vitamin D, polycystic ovary syndrome, and obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Zachary T Bloomgarden
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Comparison of accuracy of diabetes risk score and components of the metabolic syndrome in assessing risk of incident type 2 diabetes in Inter99 cohort.

Authors:  Tracy B Shafizadeh; Edward J Moler; Janice A Kolberg; Uyen Thao Nguyen; Torben Hansen; Torben Jorgensen; Oluf Pedersen; Knut Borch-Johnsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.