Literature DB >> 20143826

Adsorption of CO(2), CH(4), N(2)O, and N(2) on MOF-5, MOF-177, and zeolite 5A.

Dipendu Saha1, Zongbi Bao, Feng Jia, Shuguang Deng.   

Abstract

Adsorption equilibrium and kinetics of CO(2), CH(4), N(2)O, and N(2) on two newly discovered adsorbents, metal-organic frameworks MOF-5 and MOF-177 and one traditional adsorbent, zeolite 5A were determined to assess their efficacy for CO(2), CH(4), and N(2)O removal from air and separation of CO(2) from CH(4) in pressure swing adsorption processes. Adsorption equilibrium and kinetics data for CO(2), CH(4), N(2)O, and N(2) on all three adsorbents were measured volumetrically at 298K and gas pressures up to 800 Torr. Adsorption equilibrium capacities of CO(2) and CH(4) on all three adsorbents were determined gravimetrically at 298 K and elevated pressures (14 bar for CO(2) and 100 bar for CH(4)). The Henry's law and Langmuir adsorption equilibrium models were applied to correlate the adsorption isotherms, and a classical micropore diffusion model was used to analyze the adsorption kinetic data. The adsorption equilibrium selectivity was calculated from the ratio of Henry's constants, and the adsorbent selection parameter for pressure swing adsorption processes were determined by combining the equilibrium selectivity and working capacity ratio. Based on the selectivity and adsorbent selection parameter results, zeolite 5A is a better adsorbent for removing CO(2) and N(2)O from air and separation of CO(2) from CH(4), whereas MOF-177 is the adsorbent of choice for removing CH(4) from air. However, both MOF adsorbents have larger adsorption capacities for CO(2) and CH(4) than zeolite 5A at elevated pressures, suggesting MOF-5 and MOF-177 are better adsorbents for CO(2) and CH(4) storage. The CH(4) adsorption capacity of 22 wt.% on MOF-177 at 298K and 100 bar is probably the largest adsorption uptake of CH(4) on any dry adsorbents. The average diffusivity of CO(2), CH(4) and N(2)O in MOF-5 and MOF-177 is in the order of 10(-9) m(2)/s, as compared to 10(-11) m(2)/s for CO(2), CH(4) and N(2)O in zeolite 5A. The effects of gas pressure on diffusivity for different adsorabte-adsorbent systems were also investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20143826     DOI: 10.1021/es9032309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  22 in total

1.  Parameters determining the use of zeolite 5A as collector medium in passive flux samplers to estimate N2O emissions from livestock sources.

Authors:  Araceli D Larios; Satinder Kaur Brar; Antonio Avalos Ramírez; Stéphane Godbout; Fabiola Sandoval-Salas; Joahnn H Palacios; Patrick Dubé; Beatriz Delgado; Anne Giroir-Fendler
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Experimental Investigation of Adsorption and CO2/CH4 Separation Properties of 13X and JLOX-500 Zeolites during the Purification of Liquefied Natural Gas.

Authors:  Yongbiao Sun; Jianfeng Tang; Guangyan Li; Yihuai Hua; Hui Li; Suyang Hu
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-05-26

3.  Fighting global warming by greenhouse gas removal: destroying atmospheric nitrous oxide thanks to synergies between two breakthrough technologies.

Authors:  Tingzhen Ming; Renaud de Richter; Sheng Shen; Sylvain Caillol
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Controlling crystal growth of MIL-100(Fe) on Ag nanowire surface for optimizing catalytic performance.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Yanshuang Zhang; Xiangyun Kong; Zanru Guo; Wenyuan Xu; Zhili Fang; Shaohui Wang; Lingzhi Liu; Yongxin Liu; Jiali Zhang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.361

5.  Grafting of Amines on Ethanol-Extracted SBA-15 for CO2 Adsorption.

Authors:  Yong Li; Nannan Sun; Lei Li; Ning Zhao; Fukui Xiao; Wei Wei; Yuhan Sun; Wei Huang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Protecting metal-organic framework crystals from hydrolytic degradation by spray-dry encapsulating them into polystyrene microspheres.

Authors:  Arnau Carné-Sánchez; Kyriakos C Stylianou; Carlos Carbonell; Majid Naderi; Inhar Imaz; Daniel Maspoch
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 30.849

7.  General synthesis of hierarchical sheet/plate-like M-BDC (M = Cu, Mn, Ni, and Zr) metal-organic frameworks for electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensing.

Authors:  Gilang Gumilar; Yusuf Valentino Kaneti; Joel Henzie; Sauvik Chatterjee; Jongbeom Na; Brian Yuliarto; Nugraha Nugraha; Aep Patah; Asim Bhaumik; Yusuke Yamauchi
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 9.825

8.  Influence of Structural Heterogeneity on Diffusion of CH4 and CO2 in Silicon Carbide-Derived Nanoporous Carbon.

Authors:  Amir H Farmahini; Ali Shahtalebi; Hervé Jobic; Suresh K Bhatia
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.126

9.  Experimental analyses of the major parameters affecting the intensity of outbursts of coal and gas.

Authors:  W Nie; S J Peng; J Xu; L R Liu; G Wang; J B Geng
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-08-04

10.  A single-ligand ultra-microporous MOF for precombustion CO2 capture and hydrogen purification.

Authors:  Shyamapada Nandi; Phil De Luna; Thomas D Daff; Jens Rother; Ming Liu; William Buchanan; Ayman I Hawari; Tom K Woo; Ramanathan Vaidhyanathan
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.