Literature DB >> 20142072

Volumetric analysis of thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies.

Worawat Limthongkul1, Eldin E Karaikovic, Jason W Savage, Alexander Markovic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: During the last decade, vertebral augmentation techniques with cement (kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty) have revealed that 75% to 100% of individuals with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures have good to moderate pain relief postoperatively, as well as adequate restoration of the vertebral body height. The volume of cement injected into a vertebra varied in different reports. To our knowledge, there are no studies that report on the physiological distribution of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae body volumes.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate thoracic and lumbar vertebral body volumes. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: Forty computed tomography (CT) scans of the thoracic and lumbar spines were used to measure a volume of each vertebral body.
METHODS: Forty CT scans with standard 2.5-mm bone window cuts of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae (20 men and 20 women) were analyzed to measure the volumetric capacity of vertebral bodies using a BrainLAB Software (iPlan RT image 4.0) program. The software was tested for validity and reliability in two pilot studies. Mean and standard deviations for each vertebral body volume were calculated and recorded. The vertebral body working distance and the so-called "safe zone" were also measured to determine a size of a balloon to be used in kyphoplasty.
RESULTS: Vertebral body volume increased gradually from T1 to L4 with the exception of L5, which measured to be smaller than L4. The mean thoracic vertebrae volume was 15.0 cm(3) (ranged in the absolute values from 5.2 to 39.5 cm(3)), and the mean lumbar vertebrae volume was 35 cm(3) (ranged in the absolute values from 19.7 to 61.5 cm(3)). Men had larger volume vertebral bodies only in the lumbar spine compared with women. The average vertebral body working distances from T1 to T4 was 23.4+/-2.7 mm, from T5 to T9 was 30.3+/-3.6 mm, and from T10 to L5 was 35.5+/-3.9 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Knowing the physiological variability of vertebral body volumes may help prevent complications as a result of underaugmentation or overaugmentation with excessive amount of cement during kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fractures. We recommend using 10 mm balloons from T1 to T4, 15 mm balloons from T5 to T9, and 20 mm balloons from T10 to L5 for kyphoplasty. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20142072     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  13 in total

1.  Paget disease of the spine: an evaluation of 101 patients with a histomorphometric analysis of 29 cases.

Authors:  Jan M Pestka; Sebastian Seitz; Jozef Zustin; Klaus Püschel; Michael Amling; Florian Barvencik
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Volumetric analysis of corticocancellous bones using CT data.

Authors:  Dietmar Krappinger; Astrid von Linde; Ralf Rosenberger; Bernhard Glodny; Michael Blauth; Christian Niederwanger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Morphology of the human vertebral endplate.

Authors:  Azucena G Rodriguez; Ana E Rodriguez-Soto; Andrew J Burghardt; Sigurd Berven; Sharmila Majumdar; Jeffrey C Lotz
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Risk factors for bone cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty: a retrospective study of four hundred and eighty five patients.

Authors:  Si-Yuan Zhu; Zhao-Ming Zhong; Qian Wu; Jian-Ting Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Lumbosacral loadbearing, sagittal shift in the line of gravity and joint surface areas.

Authors:  Niladri Kumar Mahato
Journal:  Anat Sci Int       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 1.741

6.  Anthropometric approach to lumbar vertebral body volumes.

Authors:  Alexandre Caula; Gautier Metmer; Eric Havet
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Is sheep lumbar spine a suitable alternative model for human spinal researches? Morphometrical comparison study.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mageed; Dagmar Berner; Henriette Jülke; Christian Hohaus; Walter Brehm; Kerstin Gerlach
Journal:  Lab Anim Res       Date:  2013-12-20

8.  Minimum cement volume for vertebroplasty.

Authors:  David Martinčič; Miha Brojan; Franc Kosel; Darko Štern; Tomaž Vrtovec; Vane Antolič; Rok Vengust
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Cement volume is the most important modifiable predictor for pain relief in BKP: results from SWISSspine, a nationwide registry.

Authors:  Christoph Röder; Bronek Boszczyk; Gosia Perler; Emin Aghayev; Fabrice Külling; Gianluca Maestretti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Musculoskeletal outcomes and the effect of radiation to the vertebral bodies on growth trajectories for long-term survivors of high-risk neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Matthew J Ferris; Sibo Tian; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Nicholas A Madden; Bree R Eaton; Natia Esiashvili
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.