Literature DB >> 20141311

The face in the crowd effect: anger superiority when using real faces and multiple identities.

Amy E Pinkham1, Mark Griffin, Robert Baron, Noah J Sasson, Ruben C Gur.   

Abstract

The "face in the crowd effect" refers to the finding that threatening or angry faces are detected more efficiently among a crowd of distractor faces than happy or nonthreatening faces. Work establishing this effect has primarily utilized schematic stimuli and efforts to extend the effect to real faces have yielded inconsistent results. The failure to consistently translate the effect from schematic to human faces raises questions about its ecological validity. The present study assessed the face in the crowd effect using a visual search paradigm that placed veridical faces, verified to exemplify prototypical emotional expressions, within heterogeneous crowds. Results confirmed that angry faces were found more quickly and accurately than happy expressions in crowds of both neutral and emotional distractors. These results are the first to extend the face in the crowd effect beyond homogenous crowds to more ecologically valid conditions and thus provide compelling evidence for its legitimacy as a naturalistic phenomenon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20141311     DOI: 10.1037/a0017387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  47 in total

1.  The influence of attention toward facial expressions on size perception.

Authors:  Jeong-Won Choi; Kiho Kim; Jang-Han Lee
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-31

2.  Intensity dependence in high-level facial expression adaptation aftereffect.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; K Lira Yoon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

3.  Nucleus accumbens activation is linked to salience in social decision making.

Authors:  Stephanie N L Schmidt; Sabrina C Fenske; Peter Kirsch; Daniela Mier
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  Value associations of emotional faces can modify the anger superiority effect: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Shuxia Yao; Cody Ding; Senqing Qi; Dong Yang
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies?

Authors:  Rianne van Rooijen; Annemie Ploeger; Mariska E Kret
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

6.  Audiomotor integration of angry and happy prosodies.

Authors:  Sélim Yahia Coll; Sascha Frühholz; Didier Grandjean
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-19

7.  The face is more than its parts--brain dynamics of enhanced spatial attention to schematic threat.

Authors:  Mathias Weymar; Andreas Löw; Arne Ohman; Alfons O Hamm
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  tDCS application over the STG improves the ability to recognize and appreciate elements involved in humor processing.

Authors:  Mirella Manfredi; Alice Mado Proverbio; Ana Paula Gonçalves Donate; Sofia Macarini Gonçalves Vieira; William Edgar Comfort; Mariana De Araújo Andreoli; Paulo Sérgio Boggio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Brief Report: Reduced Prioritization of Facial Threat in Adults with Autism.

Authors:  Noah J Sasson; Jonathon R Shasteen; Amy E Pinkham
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-04

10.  People represent mental states in terms of rationality, social impact, and valence: Validating the 3d Mind Model.

Authors:  Mark A Thornton; Diana I Tamir
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.