Literature DB >> 20140796

Evaluation of DNA extraction methods from complex phototrophic biofilms.

Isabel Ferrera1, Ramon Massana, Vanessa Balagué, Carles Pedrós-Alió, Olga Sánchez, Jordi Mas.   

Abstract

Phototrophic biofilms are used in a variety of biotechnological and industrial processes. Understanding their structure, ie microbial composition, is a necessary step for understanding their function and, ultimately, for the success of their application. DNA analysis methods can be used to obtain information on the taxonomic composition and relative abundance of the biofilm members. The potential bias introduced by DNA extraction methods in the study of the diversity of a complex phototrophic sulfide-oxidizing biofilm was examined. The efficiency of eight different DNA extraction methods combining physical, mechanical and chemical procedures was assessed. Methods were compared in terms of extraction efficiency, measured by DNA quantification, and detectable diversity (16S rRNA genes recovered), evaluated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Significant differences were found in DNA yields ranging from 116 +/- 12 to 1893 +/- 96 ng of DNA. The different DGGE fingerprints ranged from 7 to 12 bands. Methods including phenol-chloroform extraction after enzymatic lysis resulted in the greatest DNA yields and detectable diversity. Additionally, two methods showing similar yields and retrieved diversity were compared by cloning and sequencing. Clones belonging to members of the Alpha-, Beta- and Gamma- proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria and to the Firmicutes were recovered from both libraries. However, when bead-beating was applied, clones belonging to the Deltaproteobacteria were also recovered, as well as plastid signatures. Phenol-chloroform extraction after bead-beating and enzymatic lysis was therefore considered to be the most suitable method for DNA extraction from such highly diverse phototrophic biofilms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20140796     DOI: 10.1080/08927011003605870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofouling        ISSN: 0892-7014            Impact factor:   3.209


  4 in total

1.  The epsomitic phototrophic microbial mat of Hot Lake, Washington: community structural responses to seasonal cycling.

Authors:  Stephen R Lindemann; James J Moran; James C Stegen; Ryan S Renslow; Janine R Hutchison; Jessica K Cole; Alice C Dohnalkova; Julien Tremblay; Kanwar Singh; Stephanie A Malfatti; Feng Chen; Susannah G Tringe; Haluk Beyenal; James K Fredrickson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Cyanobacterial diversity of western European biological soil crusts along a latitudinal gradient.

Authors:  Laura Williams; Katharina Loewen-Schneider; Stefanie Maier; Burkhard Büdel
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.194

3.  Untangling Genomes of Novel Planctomycetal and Verrucomicrobial Species from Monterey Bay Kelp Forest Metagenomes by Refined Binning.

Authors:  John Vollmers; Martinique Frentrup; Patrick Rast; Christian Jogler; Anne-Kristin Kaster
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Time-Dependent Changes in Morphostructural Properties and Relative Abundances of Contributors in Pleurotus ostreatus/Pseudomonas alcaliphila Mixed Biofilms.

Authors:  Silvia Crognale; Silvia Rita Stazi; Andrea Firrincieli; Lorena Pesciaroli; Stefano Fedi; Maurizio Petruccioli; Alessandro D'Annibale
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.