| Literature DB >> 31447819 |
Silvia Crognale1, Silvia Rita Stazi1, Andrea Firrincieli1, Lorena Pesciaroli1, Stefano Fedi2, Maurizio Petruccioli1, Alessandro D'Annibale1.
Abstract
Pleurotus ostreatus dual biofilms with bacteria are known to be involved inEntities:
Keywords: Calgary biofilm device; Pleurotus ostreatus; Pseudomonas alcaliphila; biomass estimation; dual biofilms; microscopy; ultrastructure
Year: 2019 PMID: 31447819 PMCID: PMC6695841 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01819
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Plate inhibition assays of P. ostreatus (left side) and P. alcaliphila (right side) grown on Luria Bertani agar (1.5%) for 24 (A), 48 (B), 72 (C), and 120 (D) h at 30°C in the dark.
Figure 2Scanning electron micrograph showing P. alcaliphila cells attached to 4-day-old P. ostreatus biofilm after 6 h from bacterial inoculation at a 4,000× magnification.
Figure 3Scanning electron micrographs of 4-day-old mono-specific P. ostreatus biofilm (A) and its mixed biofilms with P. alcaliphila obtained after 24 (B), 48 (C), and 72 (D) h of incubation at 30°C under orbital shaking (150 rpm) on MBEC™ HA-P&G system. All micrographs are at a 1,500× magnification while insets in (B) and (C) at higher magnification (4,000×). Inset in (D) shows the bacterial biofilm grown in the proximity of the air-liquid interface (1,500×).
Figure 4Transmission electron micrographs of 24-h-old mixed P. ostreatus-P. alcaliphila biofilms. (A) Longitudinal and cross-view sections of P. ostreatus hyphae and adherent P. alcaliphila cells (see black arrows) (length of the bar: 2 μm). (B) The longitudinal section of the terminal portion of a P. ostreatus hypha with EPS-promoted attachment of a bacterial cell (length of the bar: 2 μm). (C) Magnification of (B) at the hyphal tip (length of the bar: 1 μm).
Figure 5(A–I). CLSM images of mixed P. ostreatus-P. alcaliphila biofilm after 24 h (A,B), 48 h (C–G), and 72 h (H–I) from bacterial inoculum application after concomitant Syto 9 (green fluorescence) and Propidium iodide (red fluorescence) stain followed by Calcofluor staining. Orthogonal y-z and x-z views are delimited by green and red frames, respectively. Each image represents an area of 45.17 × 103 μm2 (magnification 40×) and 18.21 × 103 μm2 (magnification 63×). (A) sub-population of non-clustered viable bacterial cells in 24-h-old mixed biofilm (x-y view) with initial ECM deposition in the outer layer (x-z and y-z orthogonal views); (B) viable bacterial cluster in close proximity of inner voids (x-y view, white arrows) in 24-h-old mixed biofilm; (C) localization of viable bacterial cells at the edges of voids in 48-h-old mixed biofilm (x-y view, white arrows) (40× magnification);. (D–G), Increase in the lumina of void channels in 48-h-old biofilms from a depth of 1.03–4.24 μm (x-y view, yellow arrows) (63× magnification); (H) 72-h-old mixed biofilm characterized by a compact structure with interspersed void channels indicated by white arrows (depth: 6.43 μm, magnification: 40×); (I) the edges of large cavities are delimited by a dotted white line in 72-h-old biofilms (depth: 23.54 μm, magnification: 40×).
q-PCR quantification of bacterial (B) and fungal (F) gene copy number in mixed biofilm and their relative ratios at different incubation times.
| Time (h) | 16S RNA gene (copy number mg−1 biomass dry weight) | 18S RNA gene (copy number mg−1 biomass dry weight) | F/B |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 9.38 × 106 | 2.85 × 108 | 30.40 |
| 24 | 2.88 × 108 | 2.62 × 108 | 0.91 |
| 48 | 4.18 × 108 | 5.56 × 107 | 0.13 |
| 72 | 7.02 × 109 | 5.92 × 107 | 0.01 |
Figure 6Time-dependent changes in percent contribution of fungal (black) and bacterial (gray) biomass in mixed biofilms obtained by inoculating P. alcaliphila (Pa) on already established 4-day-old P. ostreatus (Po) biofilms and incubating for 24, 48, and 72 h at 30°C under orbital shaking (150 rpm). Plot (A) refers to the estimates obtained by q-PCR analysis of 16S and 18S rRNA genes, respectively while plot (B) refers to those obtained by ester-linked fatty acid methyl esters analysis. Pair-wise comparison between estimates obtained at the same incubation time with the two methods was performed by the Student’s t-test after arcsin of the square-root transformation of percent data. The presence of an asterisk above bars denotes the presence of statistically significant differences.
Ester-linked fatty acid methyl ester (El-FAME) analysis in mono-specific P. alcaliphila and P. ostreatus biofilms.
| Retention time (min) | FAME | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 19.718 | 14:0 | 7.69 ± 0.76 | n.d. |
| 21.48 | 15:0 | 25.14 ± 1.37 | 2.29 ± 0.19 |
| 22.863 | 16:1ω7 | 50.17 ± 21.90 | 0.51 ± 0.05 |
| 23.193 | 16:0 | 171.09 ± 5.63 | 27.63 ± 2.31 |
| 24.534 | 17:1 | n.d. | 0.40 ± 0.18 |
| 24.54 | cy 17 | 57.89 ± 1.77 | n.d. |
| 24.727 | 17:0 | 21.86 ± 0.67 | 0.82 ± 0.1 |
| 25.875 | 18:2ω6,9 | n.d. | 113.53 ± 5.2 |
| 25.887 | 18:1ω9t | 4.09 ± 0.63 | n.d. |
| 26.025 | 18:1ω9c | 234.95 ± 3.75 | 0.41 ± 0.05 |
| 26.246 | 18:0 | 8.31 ± 0.28 | n.d. |
Data are the means ± standard error of biofilms grown for 0–72 h and 96–168 h for the former and the latter species, respectively.