Literature DB >> 20140201

Fas/CD95 deficiency in ApcMin/+ mice increases intestinal tumor burden.

Hector Guillen-Ahlers1, Mark A Suckow, Francis J Castellino, Victoria A Ploplis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fas, a member of the tumor necrosis family, is responsible for initiating the apoptotic pathway when bound to its ligand, Fas-L. Defects in the Fas-mediated apoptotic pathway have been reported in colorectal cancer. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: In the present study, a variant of the Apc(Min/+) mouse, a model for the human condition, Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP), was generated with an additional deficiency of Fas (Apc(Min/+)/Fas(lpr)) by cross-breeding Apc(Min/+) mice with Fas deficient (Fas(lpr)) mice. One of the main limitations of the Apc(Min/+) mouse model is that it only develops benign polyps. However, Apc(Min/+)/Fas(lpr) mice presented with a dramatic increase in tumor burden relative to Apc(Min/+) mice and invasive lesions at advanced ages. Proliferation and apoptosis markers revealed an increase in cellular proliferation, but negligible changes in apoptosis, while p53 increased at early ages. Fas-L was lower in Apc(Min/+)/Fas(lpr) mice relative to Apc(Min/+) cohorts, which resulted in enhanced inflammation.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrated that imposition of a Fas deletion in an Apc(Min/+) background results in a more aggressive phenotype of the Apc(Min/+) mouse model, with more rapid development of invasive intestinal tumors and a decrease in Fas-L levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20140201      PMCID: PMC2816700          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Apoptosis is a regulated process that eliminates individual cells that are damaged or infected. There are several signals capable of triggering apoptosis, of which the activation of Fas/CD95/Apo-1 receptor (Fas) by Fas ligand (Fas-L) is the most studied [1]. Most information about the Fas pathway is based on the immune system, where Fas is highly expressed in activated T and B cells, thymocytes, and lung and liver cells [2]. Cloning of the Fas receptor (lpr) [3] and the Fas-L (gld) [4] genes led to studies involving their potential roles in the activation of the apoptotic pathway by death receptors. From these studies, a potential mechanism evolved in which interaction of Fas-L with Fas results in a conformational change of the receptor resulting in the assembly of the death-inducing signaling complex, which is able to recruit and cleave procaspase-8 (reviewed in [5]). During colon cancer, regulation of the Fas system facilitates tumor development. Some studies have shown that resistance of colon carcinoma cells to apoptosis can be attributed to the elevated expression of Fas-associated phosphatase-1 [6], which inhibits Fas signaling by binding to the cytoplasmic tail of Fas. Another factor that may contribute to apoptosis resistance is incomplete Fas surface expression, with appropriate Fas mRNA levels but deficient posttranslational processing, attenuating its cell surface expression and remaining inactivated [7]. Amplification of a decoy receptor for Fas-L in lung and colon cancer has also been reported [8]. A number of investigations have proposed a “Fas counterattack”, which is thought to be an anti-host tumor-derived response [9], where lymphocyte proliferation is compromised by tumor cells expressing Fas-L. This induces apoptosis in the lymphocytes, sparing tumor cells due to another mechanism, i.e., low Fas surface expression [10], [11], [12]. This notion however, remains controversial, and has been refuted by some investigators [13] and contradicted by other in vivo studies [14], [15], [16], [17]. The adenomatous polyposis coli multiple intestinal neoplasia (Apc) mouse model presents phenotypes reminiscent of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) in humans [18], [19]. Patients with FAP develop multiple adenomas in the large intestine, which lead to the development of malignant adenocarcinomas. The relevance of the Apc mouse model is that most colorectal cancers also show alterations in expression of the Apc gene [20], [21]. Apc is a gatekeeper that regulates the levels of β-catenin [22], a transcription factor that has Matrix metalloproteinase-7 [23] among its target genes. In the current study, Apc mice were crossed with Fas deficient (Fas) mice to generate Apc/Fas mice in order to study the effect of a disrupted Fas-mediated apoptotic machinery on tumor development and progression. The results are summarized herein.

Material and Methods

Mice and Tissue Processing

The animal protocols used in this study were approved by the University of Notre Dame Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Male Apc and Fas-deficient (Fas) mice (5 weeks old) were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). All animals were fed a rodent chow diet. For these studies, Apc mice were crossed with Fas mice to generate Apc mice, which were then bred to generate Apc mice. Male Apc and Apc mice (8, 12, 16, 20, and 30 weeks) in a C57BL/6 background, were used for all analyses. Tumor counting was performed under a dissecting microscope by investigators blinded to the genotype. Intestines were opened longitudinally, cleaned, Swiss-rolled, fixed with periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde (PLP), and embedded in paraffin.

Blood Analysis

Blood extracted intravenously from individual mice was treated with EDTA and an aliquot (50 µl) was applied to an automated CBC analyzer (Hemavet HV950FS, Drew Scientific, Oxford, CT, USA) in order to determine the number of leukocytes (lymphocytes, neutrophils, monocytes), erythrocytes (red blood cells, hemoglobin and hematocrit), and thrombocytes (platelets).

Histochemistry and Immunohistochemistry

Serial sections of paraffin-embedded tissue were cut for haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and for immunostaining. Active caspase-3 and Fas-L were identified utilizing polyclonal rabbit-anti-human active caspase-3 and Fas-L antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), followed by HRP-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). PCNA was identified utilizing a monoclonal mouse-anti-human PCNA antibody (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA) as the primary antibody, followed by HRP-conjugated rabbit-anti-mouse IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). A mouse monoclonal-anti-mouse p53 antibody (Abcam) was used to detect p53, followed by HRP-conjugated rabbit-anti-mouse IgG (AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK). Total Akt and phosphorylated Akt were identified utilizing polyclonal rabbit-anti-mouse Akt and pAkt antibodies (Abcam and Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, respectively), followed by biotinylated swine-anti-rabbit IgG (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) and HRP-conjugated streptavidin (BioGenex). CD45 and Mac-3 were identified utilizing a monoclonal rat-anti-mouse antibodies for CD45 and Mac-3 (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), followed by a biotinylated rabbit-anti-mouse IgG (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) and HRP conjugated streptavidin (Jackson, West Grove, PA). Phosphorylated Foxo3a was identified utilizing a polyclonal rabbit-anti-rat Foxo3a (phosphor S253) antibody (Abcam), followed by HRP-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). All stains were then developed in 3, 3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) and a haematoxylin QS counterstain was applied (Vector Laboratories, Burlington, CA).

Stain Quantification and Statistical Analysis

Immunohistochemical stains were quantified using Spectrum Plus (Version 9.0.748.1518) and ImageScope software (Aperio Technologies, Vista, CA). Slides were scanned and loaded into an electronic database at 20X by ScanScope CS (Aperio Technologies). For each stain, algorithms were developed to analyze either the percent positive stained area per tumor area (Fas-L, Akt and pAkt) or the number of positive cells per tumor area (PCNA, caspase-3, p53, CD45, Mac-3 and p-Foxo3a). Scanned slides were viewed in ImageScope where regions were drawn around each tumor and analyzed with Spectrum software, using algorithms designed for each stain. Stains using percent positive area were analyzed using color deconvolution algorithms. Stains requiring the number of positive cells per tumor area were analyzed using algorithms that separate color by optical density and also separate cells by outer membrane size and roundness. Cells that fit within the parameters set for desired cell size and shape and stain were counted, as was the area of each tumor region. The average number of cells per tumor area was then determined.

Statistical Analysis

For survival studies, the data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier treatment and the comparison of survival between both genotypes was performed using the log-rank test with Prism 4 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). The Student's t-test was used for comparison of single pairs.

Results

Fas Deletion in Apc Mice Increases the Size and Number of Intestinal Adenomas

Based on preliminary transcriptional profiling results of human colon cancer samples, where a strong downregulation of a FAS-related receptor was observed (data not shown), along with published reports of compromised Fas-mediated apoptosis in colon cancer, Apc mice were generated to determine the effects of a Fas deficiency in the Apc mouse model. Intestines harvested at various timepoints revealed that Apc mice developed dramatically more intestinal adenomas than Apcmice, increasing rapidly with time (p<0.00001 at 8 weeks, p = 0.0072 at 12 weeks, p = 0.0012 at 16 weeks, p = 0.00019 at 20 weeks and p<0.00001 at 30 wks, n = 4–10 for Apc and 5–21 for Apc), and reaching a plateau of slightly more than 70 adenomas after 16 weeks of age (Fig. 1A). The largest difference was observed at 20 weeks, where Apc mice had on average 87 intestinal adenomas per mouse compared to 13 in the Apc mice. The Fas mice, alone, did not generate any intestinal polyps. For most time points, Apcmice had slightly larger adenomas, reaching significance at 16 weeks (p<0.05) (Fig. 1B). At 30 weeks however, adenomas from Apc mice were significantly larger than adenomas from Apc mice (p<0.01). Unlike Apc mice, where the location of adenomas is almost exclusively in the small intestine, Apc mice after 16 weeks presented with large adenomas in the large intestine, additional to the ones located at the small intestine. Although there was significant tumor burden in Apc mice, it was much lower than in Apc mice. Additionally, Apc mice had a significantly reduced survival rate relative to Apc mice (Fig. 1C). The survival curves were compared using a log-rank test showing a significantly lower survival (p<0.001) in Apc mice (n = 35) compared to Apcmice (n = 89). The percent survival of Apc mice strongly decreased between 25 and 30 weeks and reached 44% at 30 weeks. This is about 12 weeks earlier than that observed in Fas mice [24]. Furthermore, unlike Apc mice, Apc mice presented with invasive lesions in all animals at 30 weeks (Fig. 2). The invasive lesions are not to be confused with herniation, a common occurrence in Apc mice. All specimens were analyzed by a veterinary pathologist utilizing standardized guidelines [25]. The percentage of invasive lesions ranged from 3.0 to 15.4% (Table 1). However, metastasis to other organs was not detected.
Figure 1

Tumor burden and survival.

(A) Intestinal tumor number, (B) tumor size, and (C) survival rate of Apc and Apc mice. Error bars in panels (A) and (B) represent standard error of the mean.

Figure 2

Invasive lesions.

H&E stains of intestinal adenoma sections of Apc mice at 30 weeks. The panel on the top represents an entire polyp with evidence of an invasive lesion, further magnified in the lower panel. Invasive lesions were analyzed by a veterinary pathologist and were not identified as areas of herniation, which is common in Apc mice.

Table 1

Percentage of invasive lesions in 30 week Apc mice.

MouseInvasive lesionsNon-invasive lesionsPercentage of invasive lesions
AP2661323.00%
AP2812218.70%
AP2852267.10%
AP2863357.90%
AP28742215.40%

Tumor burden and survival.

(A) Intestinal tumor number, (B) tumor size, and (C) survival rate of Apc and Apc mice. Error bars in panels (A) and (B) represent standard error of the mean.

Invasive lesions.

H&E stains of intestinal adenoma sections of Apc mice at 30 weeks. The panel on the top represents an entire polyp with evidence of an invasive lesion, further magnified in the lower panel. Invasive lesions were analyzed by a veterinary pathologist and were not identified as areas of herniation, which is common in Apc mice.

Adenomas from Apc Mice Show Increased Proliferation

To determine if increased polyps in the Apc mice were due to an increase in cellular proliferation and/or a decrease in apoptosis, cells positive for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) (Fig. 3) and caspase-3 (data not shown) were determined by immunohistochemistry. Several (18–205) polyps from at least 4 mice were used for each time point and genotype. Apc mice had significantly more PCNA+ cells per tumor area than Apc mice at most time points (p = 0.0014 at 8 weeks, p = 0.0038 at 16 weeks, p<0.0001 at 20 weeks and 30 weeks, n = 24–205 tumors for Apc and 18–58 tumors for Apc in 4–5 mice per genotype) (Fig. 3). Apoptosis activity was determined by measuring cleaved caspase-3 levels. Surprisingly, Apc did not show a significant change in caspase-3+ cells per tumor area at any time point, when compared to Apcmice. As another marker of apoptosis, p53 was also measured by immunohistochemistry. An increase in p53 levels was observed in Apc mice compared to Apcmice (Fig. 4). The p53 increase was observed at early time points; 8 weeks (p = 0.0009), 12weeks (p = 0.012), and 16 weeks (p<0.0001) in Apc mice compared to Apc mice (n = 26–177 tumors for Apc and 18–78 tumors for Apc in 4–5 mice per genotype). After 20 weeks, both genotypes had similar levels of p53.
Figure 3

Immunohistochemistry for PCNA in adenomas from Apc + and Apc + /Fas mice.

(A) PCNA immunostains comparing Apc to Apc mice at 8 and 20 weeks. (B) Quantitation of PCNA positive cells per tumor area at five different time points. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Figure 4

Immunohistochemistry for p53 in adenomas from Apc + and + /Fas mice.

(A) Immunostains for the apoptosis marker p53 in Apc mice and Apc mice at 8 and 20 weeks. (B) Quantitation of p53 positive cells per tumor area at five different time points. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Immunohistochemistry for PCNA in adenomas from Apc + and Apc + /Fas mice.

(A) PCNA immunostains comparing Apc to Apc mice at 8 and 20 weeks. (B) Quantitation of PCNA positive cells per tumor area at five different time points. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Immunohistochemistry for p53 in adenomas from Apc + and + /Fas mice.

(A) Immunostains for the apoptosis marker p53 in Apc mice and Apc mice at 8 and 20 weeks. (B) Quantitation of p53 positive cells per tumor area at five different time points. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Fas-L Is Decreased in Apc Mice Lacking Fas

Another study has reported an increase in intestinal tumorigenesis once functional Fas-L is lost in Apc mice [17]. To determine if, in our Fas-deficient model, the levels of Fas-L within the adenomas were altered, immunostains of Fas-L were performed on intestinal sections of Apc and Apc mice (Fig. 5). Adenomas from the Apc mice had significantly less Fas-L per tumor area than Apcmice. This observation was consistent for all time points (p = 0.039 at 8 weeks, p<0.0001 at 12, 16, 20 and 30 weeks, n = 28–198 tumors for Apc and 17–93 tumors for Apc in 4–5 mice per genotype).
Figure 5

Immunohistochemistry for Fas-L in adenomas from Apc + and + /Fas mice.

(A) Immunostains for Fas-L comparing Apc and Apc mice at 8 and 20 weeks. (B) Quantitation of Fas-L immunostains. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Immunohistochemistry for Fas-L in adenomas from Apc + and + /Fas mice.

(A) Immunostains for Fas-L comparing Apc and Apc mice at 8 and 20 weeks. (B) Quantitation of Fas-L immunostains. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Akt, Foxo3a, and Inflammatory Markers in Intestinal Tumors from Apc and Apc Mice

Fas-L, aside from triggering Fas dependent apoptosis, is considered to be an inducer of inflammation. To analyze inflammation within tumors, stains for CD45 and Mac-3 were performed on the intestines of Apc and Apc mice (Fig. 6A). At 30 weeks, there were fewer positive cells for CD45 in tumors of Apc mice (617±99 +cells/mm2, n = 17 in 4 mice) than in Apc mice (2006±86 +cells/mm2, n = 133 in 5 mice) (p<0.0001) (Fig. 6B). Mac-3, an antigen present on macrophages, had the same trend with lower levels in tumors of Apc mice (623±166 +cells/mm2, n = 21 in 4 mice) than in Apc mice (5804±175 +cells/mm2, n = 151 in 5 mice) (p<0.0001).
Figure 6

Inflammation in adenomas of Apc + and Apc Min/+ /Fas mice.

(A) Immunostains for Mac-3, CD45, p-Foxo3a, Akt and pAkt in adenomas from Apc and Apc mice at 30 weeks. (B) Quantitation of Mac-3, CD45, p-Foxo3a, Akt, and pAkt immunostains. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

Inflammation in adenomas of Apc + and Apc Min/+ /Fas mice.

(A) Immunostains for Mac-3, CD45, p-Foxo3a, Akt and pAkt in adenomas from Apc and Apc mice at 30 weeks. (B) Quantitation of Mac-3, CD45, p-Foxo3a, Akt, and pAkt immunostains. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. In addition to PCNA, cell survival was further analyzed by staining for total Akt and its activated phosphorylated form (p-Akt) (Fig. 6A). The stains revealed a predictable trend in which tumors from Apc mice showed higher levels of Akt (63.8%±7.6 n = 199 in 5 mice, versus 40.6%±4.1, n = 21 in 4 mice) and pAkt (53.0%±10.8, n = 186 in 5 mice, versus 13.7%±2.0, n = 28 in 5 mice) than Apc mice (p<0.0001) (Fig. 6B). Akt is reported to decrease expression of Fas-L by phosphorylating and, therefore, inhibiting Foxo3a, a member of the forkhead family of transcription factors responsible for Fas-L expression [26], [27]. In accordance with those reports, levels of phosphorylated Foxo3a (p-Foxo3a) were higher in the tumors of Apc mice (7038±230 +cells/mm2, n = 139 in 4 mice) compared to the tumors in Apc mice (5523±398 +cells/mm2, n = 20 in 3 mice) (p = 0.017) (Fig. 6A,B).

Hematology Profile

Prior to perfusion, blood was collected from all animals for hematological profiling. Measurements of leukocyte (neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes) levels revealed that the averages remained within the normal ranges (data not shown). Apc mice, at most time points, were anemic as determined by red blood cell counts, hemoglobin, and percent hematocrit. However, Apc mice, as well as Fas mice were also anemic. Platelets, in all cases, were within normal ranges (data not shown).

Discussion

This study demonstrated that Apc mice develop more intestinal adenomas when Fas is absent. An increase in proliferation (measured by PCNA) was evident, especially at later time points where an increase in Akt and pAkt was also observed. Additionally, there was a decrease in Fas-L in Apc mice. A significant increase in inflammation and Mac-3 was also observed in tumors of Apc mice. In the present study it was observed that at all time points (8, 12, 16, 20 and 30 weeks), Apc mice developed substantially more intestinal adenomas when Fas was eliminated. These adenomas also proved to be more aggressive. Incidences of intestinal prolapse were common in the Apc mice, especially at the later time points. Overall, the poor health of these animals was evidenced by their diminished survival rate as they approached 30 weeks of age. These findings were not surprising and were in accord with expectations from disruption of the apoptotic pathway [28]. However, the levels of the apoptotic markers, activated caspase-3 and p53, were unexpected. There were no differences in activated caspase-3 levels, but an increase in p53 levels was observed in Apc mice compared to Apc mice. Changes in cleaved caspase-3 were also absent in previous studies using Apc mice lacking Fas-L [17]. On the other hand, p53, also an apoptotic marker, was higher in tumors of Apc mice compared to Apcmice at early time points. However, this difference was attenuated at 30 weeks, when Akt and pAkt were observed to be higher in Apc mice compared to Apcmice. Akt is a protein kinase activated by a variety of growth factors [29], [30] that in turn triggers activation of several cancer-relevant downstream effector molecules, resulting in an environment that promotes proliferation and cell survival [31]. It has previously been reported that Akt is capable of downregulating p53 through phosphorylation of Mdm2 that results in a translocation to the nucleus [32], [33]. The increase of p53 might also be a compensatory mechanism for a lack of Fas pathway. The interdependence between Fas and p53 pathways has been demonstrated by others [34], [35]. In accordance with reports indicating that Akt regulation in Fas-L expression is due to phosphorylation and, therefore, cytoplasmic retention of the forkhead transcription factor FKHRL1/Foxo3a [26], [27], intestinal adenomas of the Apc mice at later time points presented with fewer Fas-L than tumors found in the Apcmice. This observation indicates that in the Apc mouse model, a Fas deficiency does not compromise tumor growth. On the contrary, by disrupting the Fas machinery, these tumors developed faster, and in greater numbers. These results are consistent with previous reports highlighting the anti-tumor effects of Fas-L [14], [36], as well as with recent findings of increased tumor burden in Apc mice deficient for Fas-L [17]. However, there are a number of studies that report opposite findings where Fas-L confers more rapid tumor formation in murine melanoma cells [37]. Higher Fas-L expression has also been reported in liver metastasis of colon cancer compared to the primary tumor [38]. Those findings might represent a compensatory mechanism for a disrupted Fas-mediated apoptotic pathway. Despite the general assumption that high levels of Fas-L would induce inflammation within the tumors, in the present study it was observed that Apc mice, which had far lower levels of Fas-L than Apc mice, showed an increase in inflammation at 30 weeks of age. The mechanism behind the increased level of inflammation in tumors of Apc mice is likely related to a balance between membrane Fas-L (mFas-L) and soluble Fas-L (sFas-L) (Fig. 7). mFas-L is a well known inducer of inflammation while sFas-L has the opposite effect [39]. Mmp7 is capable of cleaving mFas-L to yield sFas-L [40]. The Apc mouse model and colon cancer in general show elevated levels of matrilysin [41], [42]. Therefore, it is not unlikely to assume that in this context the balance between mFas-L and sFas-L would favor its soluble form and therefore a direct correlation between Fas-L and inflammation levels would be expected, as was observed in the present study. Fas-L expression is regulated by Foxo3a, a member of the forkhead family of transcription factors. Akt has been reported to decrease Fas-L expression by phosphorylation and therefore inactivation of Foxo3a. In accord with this mechanism, Apc mice showed higher levels of Akt, p-Akt, and p-Foxo3a, and lower levels of Fas-L.
Figure 7

Proposed model for the increase in tumor burden in absence of Fas/CD95 in Apc + mice.

p-Akt inactivates Foxo3a by phosphorylation and p-Foxo3a is not able to translocate to the nucleus. Foxo3a is involved in the transcription of Fas-L. Fas-L forms a homotrimer transmembrane complex with a cleavage site (black circles), that is recognized by Mmp7. Mmp7 cleavage of mFas-L yields sFas-L (grey rectangles). The membrane and soluble forms of Fas-L have opposite effects on inflammation.

Proposed model for the increase in tumor burden in absence of Fas/CD95 in Apc + mice.

p-Akt inactivates Foxo3a by phosphorylation and p-Foxo3a is not able to translocate to the nucleus. Foxo3a is involved in the transcription of Fas-L. Fas-L forms a homotrimer transmembrane complex with a cleavage site (black circles), that is recognized by Mmp7. Mmp7 cleavage of mFas-L yields sFas-L (grey rectangles). The membrane and soluble forms of Fas-L have opposite effects on inflammation. A relationship between inflammation and cancer has been identified in a number of studies, and it is widely accepted that inflammation creates conditions that promote tumor development (reviewed in [43]). Furthermore, Mac-3, an antigen present on macrophages, was present at higher levels in tumors of Apc mice and their presence within tumors promoted tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis [44], [45]. The results of the present study correlate to those of Fingleton et al. [17] with differences that are worthy of further consideration. Fingleton et al. used 17 week Apc mice lacking Fas-L instead of its receptor, Fas. Both studies detected high levels of Fas-L in Apc mice. While deficiencies of either Fas or FasL resulted in an increase in tumor burden, in the current study, the increases in tumor number ranged from ∼300%, at early time points, to over 500%, at 16 weeks, whereas Fingleton et al. observed an increase nearly 100% at 17 weeks. These differences in tumor burden are most likely associated with difference in the inflammatory response observed in these studies. Fingleton et al. did not observe any significant changes in macrophage or lymphocyte infiltration, but did see a 3-fold decrease in neutrophils in Apc mice lacking Fas-L. In contrast, the current study demonstrated an obvious increase in the inflammatory response in Apc mice. This supports the premise that the role played by in inflammation is more relevant in tumor development than it is in tumor evasion of the immune system. The current study, however, suggests that in intestinal adenomas, the balance between mFas-L and sFas-L levels, resulting from Mmp7 proteolysis, may regulate the pro- or anti-inflammatory properties of Fas-L. Among the main objectives for generating the Apc mice was to determine if a more aggressive variant of the Apc mouse model would evolve. At 30 weeks of age, all of the Apc mice had invasive lesions, which was not observed in the Apc mouse model. It is likely that invasive lesions arise, at least in part, as a result of an increase in Akt and its active form, since this kinase has been shown to be involved in tumor invasion and metastasis [46], [47], [48]. In summary, this study demonstrated that an additional Fas deficiency in Apc mice causes a dramatic increase in the number of intestinal tumors. The increase in the incidence of adenoma development and the invasiveness of these adenomas, paralleling a decrease in Fas-L in these mice, does not support the Fas counterattack notion in this model. The increase in Mac-3 and CD45 suggests a tumor permissive environment caused by a Fas-L modulated inflammation.
  48 in total

1.  Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a Forkhead transcription factor.

Authors:  A Brunet; A Bonni; M J Zigmond; M Z Lin; P Juo; L S Hu; M J Anderson; K C Arden; J Blenis; M E Greenberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-03-19       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Altered trafficking of Fas and subsequent resistance to Fas-mediated apoptosis occurs by a wild-type p53 independent mechanism in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Raja S Mahidhara; Pierre E Queiroz De Oliveira; Jaromir Kohout; David G Beer; Jiayuh Lin; Simon C Watkins; Paul D Robbins; Steven J Hughes
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 3.  Wnt signalling in stem cells and cancer.

Authors:  Tannishtha Reya; Hans Clevers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Human melanoma cells do not express Fas (Apo-1/CD95) ligand.

Authors:  D B Chappell; T Z Zaks; S A Rosenberg; N P Restifo
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Fas ligand expression on islets as well as multiple cell lines results in accelerated neutrophilic rejection.

Authors:  S M Kang; Z Lin; N L Ascher; P G Stock
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 6.  Apoptosis control by death and decoy receptors.

Authors:  A Ashkenazi; V M Dixit
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 8.382

7.  Fas ligand expression in primary colon adenocarcinomas: evidence that the Fas counterattack is a prevalent mechanism of immune evasion in human colon cancer.

Authors:  J O'Connell; M W Bennett; G C O'Sullivan; D Roche; J Kelly; J K Collins; F Shanahan
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 8.  A clinician's guide to hereditary colon cancer.

Authors:  Ellen T Matloff; Karina L Brierley; Christina M Chimera
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.360

9.  Genomic amplification of a decoy receptor for Fas ligand in lung and colon cancer.

Authors:  R M Pitti; S A Marsters; D A Lawrence; M Roy; F C Kischkel; P Dowd; A Huang; C J Donahue; S W Sherwood; D T Baldwin; P J Godowski; W I Wood; A L Gurney; K J Hillan; R L Cohen; A D Goddard; D Botstein; A Ashkenazi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  FasL is more frequently expressed in liver metastases of colorectal cancer than in matched primary carcinomas.

Authors:  B Mann; A Gratchev; C Böhm; M L Hanski; H D Foss; G Demel; B Trojanek; I Schmidt-Wolf; H Stein; E O Riecken; H J Buhr; C Hanski
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  15 in total

1.  NF-κB directly regulates Fas transcription to modulate Fas-mediated apoptosis and tumor suppression.

Authors:  Feiyan Liu; Kankana Bardhan; Dafeng Yang; Muthusamy Thangaraju; Vadivel Ganapathy; Jennifer L Waller; Georgia B Liles; Jeffrey R Lee; Kebin Liu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Down-regulation of BAX gene during carcinogenesis and acquisition of resistance to 5-FU in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mehdi Manoochehri; Ashraf Karbasi; Mojgan Bandehpour; Bahram Kazemi
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 3.  Deconstructing p53 transcriptional networks in tumor suppression.

Authors:  Kathryn T Bieging; Laura D Attardi
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 20.808

4.  The armadillo repeat domain of Apc suppresses intestinal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Richard C Crist; Jacquelyn J Roth; Amy A Baran; Benjamin J McEntee; Linda D Siracusa; Arthur M Buchberg
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Circulating levels of soluble Fas ligand reflect disease progression in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Michael G Alexandrakis; Constantina A Pappa; Anna Kolovou; Stavroula Kyriakaki; Rodanthi Vyzoukaki; Maria Devetzoglou; George Tsirakis
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Acute sensitization of colon cancer cells to inflammatory cytokines by prophase arrest.

Authors:  Anton Kuratnik; Virginia E Senapati; Rajeev Verma; Barbara G Mellone; Anthony T Vella; Charles Giardina
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.858

7.  An apoptosis-independent role of SMAC in tumor suppression.

Authors:  W Qiu; H Liu; A Sebastini; Q Sun; H Wang; L Zhang; J Yu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 8.756

8.  Effect of sulindac sulfide on metallohydrolases in the human colon cancer cell line HT-29.

Authors:  Hector Guillen-Ahlers; Jiangning Tan; Francis J Castellino; Victoria A Ploplis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Oncolytic poxvirus armed with Fas ligand leads to induction of cellular Fas receptor and selective viral replication in FasR-negative cancer.

Authors:  M Sathaiah; P Thirunavukkarasu; M E O'Malley; M A Kavanagh; R Ravindranathan; F Austin; Z S Guo; D L Bartlett
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 5.987

10.  Recent progress in mouse models for tumor suppressor genes and its implications in human cancer.

Authors:  Kazushi Inoue; Elizabeth A Fry; Pankaj Taneja
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2013-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.