Literature DB >> 20139221

Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 vaccine on all HPV-associated genital diseases in young women.

Nubia Muñoz1, Susanne K Kjaer, Kristján Sigurdsson, Ole-Erik Iversen, Mauricio Hernandez-Avila, Cosette M Wheeler, Gonzalo Perez, Darron R Brown, Laura A Koutsky, Eng Hseon Tay, Patricía J Garcia, Kevin A Ault, Suzanne M Garland, Sepp Leodolter, Sven-Eric Olsson, Grace W K Tang, Daron G Ferris, Jorma Paavonen, Marc Steben, F Xavier Bosch, Joakim Dillner, Warner K Huh, Elmar A Joura, Robert J Kurman, Slawomir Majewski, Evan R Myers, Luisa L Villa, Frank J Taddeo, Christine Roberts, Amha Tadesse, Janine T Bryan, Lisa C Lupinacci, Katherine E D Giacoletti, Heather L Sings, Margaret K James, Teresa M Hesley, Eliav Barr, Richard M Haupt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of the prophylactic vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, and 18 (HPV6/11/16/18) on all HPV-associated genital disease was investigated in a population that approximates sexually naive women in that they were "negative to 14 HPV types" and in a mixed population of HPV-exposed and -unexposed women (intention-to-treat group).
METHODS: This analysis studied 17 622 women aged 15-26 years who were enrolled in one of two randomized, placebo-controlled, efficacy trials for the HPV6/11/16/18 vaccine (first patient on December 28, 2001, and studies completed July 31, 2007). Vaccine or placebo was given at day 1, month 2, and month 6. All women underwent cervicovaginal sampling and Papanicolaou (Pap) testing at day 1 and every 6-12 months thereafter. Outcomes were any cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; any external anogenital and vaginal lesions; Pap test abnormalities; and procedures such as colposcopy and definitive therapy. Absolute rates are expressed as women with endpoint per 100 person-years at risk.
RESULTS: The average follow-up was 3.6 years (maximum of 4.9 years). In the population that was negative to 14 HPV types, vaccination was up to 100% effective in reducing the risk of HPV16/18-related high-grade cervical, vulvar, and vaginal lesions and of HPV6/11-related genital warts. In the intention-to-treat group, vaccination also statistically significantly reduced the risk of any high-grade cervical lesions (19.0% reduction; rate vaccine = 1.43, rate placebo = 1.76, difference = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13 to 0.54), vulvar and vaginal lesions (50.7% reduction; rate vaccine = 0.10, rate placebo = 0.20, difference = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.16), genital warts (62.0% reduction; rate vaccine = 0.44, rate placebo = 1.17, difference = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.87), Pap abnormalities (11.3% reduction; rate vaccine = 10.36, rate placebo = 11.68, difference = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.74 to 1.90), and cervical definitive therapy (23.0% reduction; rate vaccine = 1.97, rate placebo = 2.56, difference = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.83), irrespective of causal HPV type.
CONCLUSIONS: High-coverage HPV vaccination programs among adolescents and young women may result in a rapid reduction of genital warts, cervical cytological abnormalities, and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. In the longer term, substantial reductions in the rates of cervical, vulvar, and vaginal cancers may follow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20139221     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  191 in total

1.  Selecting a mix of prevention strategies against cervical cancer for maximum efficiency with an optimization program.

Authors:  Nadia Demarteau; Thomas Breuer; Baudouin Standaert
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The value of HPV vaccination.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Geographic poverty and racial/ethnic disparities in cervical cancer precursor rates in Connecticut, 2008-2009.

Authors:  Linda M Niccolai; Pamela J Julian; Alyssa Bilinski; Niti R Mehta; James I Meek; Daniel Zelterman; James L Hadler; Lynn Sosa
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Re: Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 vaccine on all HPV-associated genital diseases in young women.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Paul L Reiter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Virus-based nanoparticles as platform technologies for modern vaccines.

Authors:  Karin L Lee; Richard M Twyman; Steven Fiering; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2016-01-19

6.  Review of Gardasil.

Authors:  Diane M Harper; Stephen L Vierthaler; Jennifer A Santee
Journal:  J Vaccines Vaccin       Date:  2010-11-23

Review 7.  Lessons learned from successful human vaccines: Delineating key epitopes by dissecting the capsid proteins.

Authors:  Xiao Zhang; Lu Xin; Shaowei Li; Mujin Fang; Jun Zhang; Ningshao Xia; Qinjian Zhao
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Biopharmaceuticals and monoclonal antibodies in oncology trials--a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  T Janowitz
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 1.650

Review 9.  Immune therapy for human papillomaviruses-related cancers.

Authors:  Ricardo Rosales; Carlos Rosales
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

Review 10.  Immunoprevention of human papillomavirus-associated malignancies.

Authors:  Joshua W Wang; Chein-Fu Hung; Warner K Huh; Cornelia L Trimble; Richard B S Roden
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.