Literature DB >> 20136236

Encapsulated contrast microbubble radial oscillation associated with postexcitation pressure peaks.

M D Santin1, D A King, J Foiret, A Haak, W D O'Brien, S L Bridal.   

Abstract

This work combines modeling and experiment to assess encapsulated microbubble oscillations associated with broadband pressure peaks detected after microbubble excitation (postexcitation signals). Data were acquired from albumin-shelled and phospholipid-shelled microbubbles using a passive cavitation detector consisting of a confocally aligned 2.8-MHz transmitter and 13-MHz receiver. Microbubbles in weak solutions were insonified with a 5-cycle pulse at a peak rarefactional pressure of 2.0+/-0.2 MPa. For each microbubble type, at least 100 received signals were identified as individual-microbubble responses. The average broadband noise from signals with postexcitation response was 4.2-7.2 dB higher than from signals without postexcitation. Pressure-time responses for each microbubble type were simulated using the model by Marmottant et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 3499-3505 (2005)], with insonification conditions matching the experiment. Increased broadband noise predicted for microbubbles with postexcitation response was consistent with that observed experimentally (4.0-8.9 dB). The model predicted that postexcitation signals occur only when the radial oscillation exceeds both the shell break-up threshold and twice the initial radius (free bubble inertial cavitation threshold).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20136236      PMCID: PMC2852442          DOI: 10.1121/1.3277216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction.

Authors:  J E Chomas; P Dayton; J Allen; K Morgan; K W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  A Newtonian rheological model for the interface of microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  Dhiman Chatterjee; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  WFUMB Safety Symposium on Echo-Contrast Agents: nature and types of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Acoustically-active microbubbles conjugated to liposomes: characterization of a proposed drug delivery vehicle.

Authors:  Azadeh Kheirolomoom; Paul A Dayton; Aaron F H Lum; Erika Little; Eric E Paoli; Hairong Zheng; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2006-12-23       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Targeted disruption of the blood-brain barrier with focused ultrasound: association with cavitation activity.

Authors:  N McDannold; N Vykhodtseva; K Hynynen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Microbubble contrast agents: targeted ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-assisted drug-delivery applications.

Authors:  Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals.

Authors:  Azzdine Y Ammi; Robin O Cleveland; Jonathan Mamou; Grace I Wang; S Lori Bridal; William D O'Brien
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Predicting backscatter characteristics from micron- and submicron-scale ultrasound contrast agents using a size-integration technique.

Authors:  Hairong Zheng; Alexander Barker; Robin Shandas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents.

Authors:  P A Dayton; K E Morgan; A L Klibanov; G H Brandenburger; K W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Detection of acoustic cavitation in the heart with microbubble contrast agents in vivo: a mechanism for ultrasound-induced arrhythmias.

Authors:  Claudio Rota; Carol H Raeman; Sally Z Child; Diane Dalecki
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Acoustic characterization of echogenic liposomes: frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter.

Authors:  Jonathan A Kopechek; Kevin J Haworth; Jason L Raymond; T Douglas Mast; Stephen R Perrin; Melvin E Klegerman; Shaoling Huang; Tyrone M Porter; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Determination of postexcitation thresholds for single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles using double passive cavitation detection.

Authors:  Daniel A King; Michael J Malloy; Alayna C Roberts; Alexander Haak; Christian C Yoder; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparison between maximum radial expansion of ultrasound contrast agents and experimental postexcitation signal results.

Authors:  Daniel A King; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relationship between cavitation and loss of echogenicity from ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Kirthi Radhakrishnan; Kenneth B Bader; Kevin J Haworth; Jonathan A Kopechek; Jason L Raymond; Shao-Ling Huang; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Gauging the likelihood of stable cavitation from ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Quantitative analysis of ultrasound contrast agent postexcitation collapse.

Authors:  Daniel A King; William D O'Brien
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Implementation of a Novel 288-Element Dual-Frequency Array for Acoustic Angiography: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization.

Authors:  Isabel G Newsome; Thomas M Kierski; Guofeng Pang; Jianhua Yin; Jing Yang; Emmanuel Cherin; F Stuart Foster; Claudia A Carnevale; Christine E M Demore; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.267

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.