Literature DB >> 20135172

A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stones.

Virinder K Bansal1, Mahesh C Misra, Pramod Garg, Manik Prabhu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of patients with concomitant common bile duct stones and gallstones is still evolving. With the introduction of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, many centers prefer single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration over preoperative endoscopic bile duct clearance followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The present study was done to compare these two management options. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 30 patients with symptomatic gallstones and common bile duct stones were randomized to either treatment option. Preoperative endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and/or magnetic resonance pancreaticography (MRCP) was done in all patients to confirm the diagnosis. In group I, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration was done at the same sitting; in group II, endoscopic stone clearance was followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy 4-6 weeks later. Success was defined as successful treatment by the intended modality.
RESULTS: 15 patients were randomized to each group and the two groups had comparable demographic and clinical profile. In group I there was a success rate of 93.5% in comparison with 86.7% in group II (p = 0.32, Fisher's exact test). The complications were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The results showed equivalent success rate in terms of morbidity and hospital stay. Laparoscopic approach seems to be favorable because of the smaller number of procedures and hospital visits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20135172     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-0891-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  16 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  S E Tranter; M H Thompson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  G Sgourakis; K Karaliotas
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter?

Authors:  A de Vries; S C Donkervoort; A A W van Geloven; E G J M Pierik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Long-term results after laparoscopic transverse choledochotomy for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  A M Paganini; M Guerrieri; J Sarnari; A De Sanctis; G D'Ambrosio; G Lezoche; E Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; E Lezoche; M Morino; E Croce; A Lacy; J Toouli; A Faggioni; V M Ribeiro; J Jakimowicz; J Visa; G B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones. A multi-institutional SAGES study. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons.

Authors:  G Berci; L Morgenstern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  EUS versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Tarkan Karakan; Mehmet Cindoruk; Hakan Alagozlu; Meltem Ergun; Sukru Dumlu; Selahattin Unal
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  A randomized, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Hamish Noble; Sheena Tranter; Tim Chesworth; Sally Norton; Michael Thompson
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.878

9.  Common bile duct exploration in the era of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  M E Stoker
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-03

10.  Role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of bile duct lithiasis.

Authors:  Damir Miletic; Miljenko Uravic; Marzena Mazur-Brbac; Davor Stimac; Davor Petranovic; Branko Sestan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.282

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of one- vs. two-stage laparoscopic/endoscopic management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Nicholas Alexakis; Saxon Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  A study of preoperative factors associated with a poor outcome following laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Ragini Kilambi; Virinder Kumar Bansal; Mahesh C Misra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Management of common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  A Sharma; P Dahiya; R Khullar; V Soni; M Baijal; P K Chowbey
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Eleven years of primary closure of common bile duct after choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Nuria Estellés Vidagany; Carlos Domingo Del Pozo; Nuria Peris Tomás; Jose Ángel Díez Ares; Antonio Vázquez Tarragón; Francisco Blanes Masson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yunxiao Lyu; Yunxiao Cheng; Ting Li; Bin Cheng; Xin Jin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of 4 Combinations of Laparoscopic and Intraoperative Techniques for Management of Gallstone Disease With Biliary Duct Calculi: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudio Ricci; Nico Pagano; Giovanni Taffurelli; Carlo Alberto Pacilio; Marina Migliori; Franco Bazzoli; Riccardo Casadei; Francesco Minni
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Routine use of simultaneous laparoendoscopic approach in patients with confirmed gallbladder and bile duct stones: fit for laparoscopy fit for "rendezvous".

Authors:  Cinzia Tommasi; Lapo Bencini; Marco Bernini; Riccardo Naspetti; Giulia Cavallina; Roberto Manetti; Luca Talamucci; Marco Farsi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Prevalence and Predictors of Unnecessary Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Two-Stage Endoscopic Stone Extraction Followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Lee; Do Hyun Park; Jae Hoon Lee; Dong Wook Oh; Tae Jun Song; Sang Soo Lee; Dong-Wan Seo; Sung Koo Lee; Myung-Hwan Kim; Ji Eun Moon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Modern approach to cholecysto-choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Lapo Bencini; Cinzia Tommasi; Roberto Manetti; Marco Farsi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-02-16

10.  Single-stage vs. two-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Guoqian Ding; Wang Cai; Mingfang Qin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.