OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team on outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). DESIGN: Retrospective study with historical controls. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven patients with sTBI tracheostomized before implementation of the tracheostomy team approach and 34 patients followed by the team. SETTING: A regional level 1 tertiary care trauma center, McGill University Health Centre-Montreal General Hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to decannulation, length of stay (LOS), Passy-Muir speaking valve use, and extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) scores given at acute care discharge. RESULTS: The groups were similar for injury severity, age, and premorbid health conditions. Postteam patients had a significantly shorter LOS (P = .025) and more of them used Passy-Muir speaking valves (P = .004). Furthermore, there was a trend toward decreased time to decannulation in the postteam group. GOS-E scores did not differ significantly between groups (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Implementation of the tracheostomy team appears to have had positive clinical benefits for this population.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team on outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). DESIGN: Retrospective study with historical controls. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven patients with sTBI tracheostomized before implementation of the tracheostomy team approach and 34 patients followed by the team. SETTING: A regional level 1 tertiary care trauma center, McGill University Health Centre-Montreal General Hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to decannulation, length of stay (LOS), Passy-Muir speaking valve use, and extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) scores given at acute care discharge. RESULTS: The groups were similar for injury severity, age, and premorbid health conditions. Postteam patients had a significantly shorter LOS (P = .025) and more of them used Passy-Muir speaking valves (P = .004). Furthermore, there was a trend toward decreased time to decannulation in the postteam group. GOS-E scores did not differ significantly between groups (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Implementation of the tracheostomy team appears to have had positive clinical benefits for this population.
Authors: Shailesh Bihari; Shivesh Prakash; Paul Hakendorf; Christopher MacBryde Horwood; Steve Tarasenko; Andrew W Holt; Julie Ratcliffe; Andrew D Bersten Journal: J Intensive Care Soc Date: 2018-03-05