Literature DB >> 30515240

Healthcare costs and outcomes for patients undergoing tracheostomy in an Australian tertiary level referral hospital.

Shailesh Bihari1,2, Shivesh Prakash1,2, Paul Hakendorf3,4, Christopher MacBryde Horwood4, Steve Tarasenko5, Andrew W Holt1,2, Julie Ratcliffe6, Andrew D Bersten1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing tracheostomy represent a unique cohort, as often they have prolonged hospital stay, require multi-disciplinary, resource-intensive care, and may have poor outcomes. Currently, there is a lack of data around overall healthcare cost for these patients and their outcomes in terms of morbidity and mortality. The objective of the study was to estimate healthcare costs and outcomes associated in tracheostomy patients at a tertiary level hospital in South Australia.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data in patients who underwent tracheostomy between July 2009 and May 2015.
METHODS: Overall healthcare-associated costs, length of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit stay, and mortality rates were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 454 patients with tracheostomies were examined. Majority of the tracheostomies (n = 386 (85%)) were performed in intensive care unit patients, predominantly using bedside percutaneous approach (85%). The median length of hospital stay was 44 (29-63) days and the in-hospital mortality rate was 20%. Overall total cost of managing a patient with tracheostomy was median $192,184 (inter-quartile range $122560-$295553); mean 225,200 (range $5942-$1046675) Australian dollars. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the measured outcomes, including costs, between patients who underwent percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy and patients who underwent early versus late tracheostomy in their intensive care unit stay. Factors that predicted (adjusted R 2 = 0.53) the cost per patient were intensive care unit length of stay and hospital length of stay.
CONCLUSION: Hospitalised patients undergoing tracheostomy experience high morbidity and mortality and typically experience highly resource-intensive and costly healthcare.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tracheostomy; healthcare costs; intensive care unit; mortality; percutaneous tracheostomy; surgical tracheostomy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30515240      PMCID: PMC6259091          DOI: 10.1177/1751143718762342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc        ISSN: 1751-1437


  27 in total

1.  Using costing as a district planning and management tool in Balochistan, Pakistan.

Authors:  A Green; B Ali; A Naeem; A Vassall
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.344

2.  Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy or conventional surgical tracheostomy?

Authors:  M Heikkinen; P Aarnio; J Hannukainen
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Differences and similarities in the practice of medicine between australia and the United States of america: challenges and opportunities for the university of queensland and the ochsner clinical school.

Authors:  Peter D Jones; Leonardo Seoane; Richard Deichmann; Charles Kantrow
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2011

4.  A multi-institutional analysis of tracheotomy complications.

Authors:  Stacey L Halum; Jonathan Y Ting; Emily K Plowman; Peter C Belafsky; Claude F Harbarger; Gregory N Postma; Michael J Pitman; Donna LaMonica; Augustine Moscatello; Sid Khosla; Christy E Cauley; Nicole C Maronian; Sami Melki; Cameron Wick; John T Sinacori; Zrria White; Ahmed Younes; Dale C Ekbom; Maya G Sardesai; Albert L Merati
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  A prospective, randomized study comparing percutaneous with surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients.

Authors:  B D Freeman; K Isabella; J P Cobb; W A Boyle; R E Schmieg; M H Kolleff; N Lin; T Saak; E C Thompson; T G Buchman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a prospective randomized trial comparing open surgical tracheostomy with endoscopically guided percutaneous dilational tracheotomy.

Authors:  D D Massick; S Yao; D M Powell; D Griesen; T Hobgood; J N Allen; D E Schuller
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Early vs late tracheotomy for prevention of pneumonia in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Terragni; Massimo Antonelli; Roberto Fumagalli; Chiara Faggiano; Maurizio Berardino; Franco Bobbio Pallavicini; Antonio Miletto; Salvatore Mangione; Angelo U Sinardi; Mauro Pastorelli; Nicoletta Vivaldi; Alberto Pasetto; Giorgio Della Rocca; Rosario Urbino; Claudia Filippini; Eva Pagano; Andrea Evangelista; Gianni Ciccone; Luciana Mascia; V Marco Ranieri
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Early tracheostomy decreases ventilation time but has no impact on mortality of intensive care patients: a randomized study.

Authors:  Tillo Koch; Birgit Hecker; Andreas Hecker; Florian Brenck; Matthias Preuß; Thorsten Schmelzer; Winfried Padberg; Markus A Weigand; Joachim Klasen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 9.  Tracheostomy: epidemiology, indications, timing, technique, and outcomes.

Authors:  Nora H Cheung; Lena M Napolitano
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.258

10.  Outcomes of early versus late tracheostomy: 2008-2010.

Authors:  Jennifer A Villwock; Kristin Jones
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.