Literature DB >> 20133095

Can mammographic assessments lead to consider density as a risk factor for breast cancer?

C Colin1, V Prince, P J Valette.   

Abstract

Admitting that mammographic breast density is an important independent risk factor for breast cancer in the general population, has a crucial economical health care impact, since it might lead to increasing screening frequency or reinforcing additional modalities. Thus, the impact of density as a risk factor has to be carefully investigated and might be debated. Some authors suggested that high density would be either a weak factor or confused with a masking effect. Others concluded that most of the studies have methodological biases in basic physics to quantify percentage of breast density, as well as in mammographic acquisition parameters. The purpose of this review is to evaluate mammographic procedures and density assessments in published studies regarding density as a breast cancer risk. No standardization was found in breast density assessments and compared density categories. High density definitions varied widely from 25 to 75% of dense tissues on mammograms. Some studies showed an insufficient follow-up to reveal masking effect related to mammographic false negatives. Evaluating breast density impact needs thorough studies with consensual mammographic procedures, methods of density measurement, breast density classification as well as a standardized definition of high breast density. Digital mammography, more effective in dense breasts, should help to re-evaluate the issue of density as a risk factor for breast cancer.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20133095     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  8 in total

1.  Breast density quantification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with bias field correction: a postmortem study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Travis Johnson; Muqing Lin; Huy Q Le; Justin L Ducote; Min-Ying Su; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Prediction of near-term breast cancer risk based on bilateral mammographic feature asymmetry.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Bin Zheng; Pandiyarajan Ramalingam; David Gur
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  Mammographic density is not a worthwhile examination to distinguish high cancer risk women in screening.

Authors:  Catherine Colin; Anne-Marie Schott; Pierre-Jean Valette
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: a preliminary assessment.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Jules H Sumkin; Margarita L Zuley; Xingwei Wang; Amy H Klym; David Gur
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 5.  Imaging Breast Density: Established and Emerging Modalities.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Gultekin Gulsen; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.243

6.  Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Hildegunn S Aase; Marina Álvarez; Edward Azavedo; Henk J Baarslag; Corinne Balleyguier; Pascal A Baltzer; Vanesa Beslagic; Ulrich Bick; Dragana Bogdanovic-Stojanovic; Ruta Briediene; Boris Brkljacic; Julia Camps Herrero; Catherine Colin; Eleanor Cornford; Jan Danes; Gérard de Geer; Gul Esen; Andrew Evans; Michael H Fuchsjaeger; Fiona J Gilbert; Oswald Graf; Gormlaith Hargaden; Thomas H Helbich; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Valentin Ivanov; Ásbjörn Jónsson; Christiane K Kuhl; Eugenia C Lisencu; Elzbieta Luczynska; Ritse M Mann; Jose C Marques; Laura Martincich; Margarete Mortier; Markus Müller-Schimpfle; Katalin Ormandi; Pietro Panizza; Federica Pediconi; Ruud M Pijnappel; Katja Pinker; Tarja Rissanen; Natalia Rotaru; Gianni Saguatti; Tamar Sella; Jana Slobodníková; Maret Talk; Patrice Taourel; Rubina M Trimboli; Ilse Vejborg; Athina Vourtsis; Gabor Forrai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Breast Density and Risk of Breast Cancer in Asian Women: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Jong-Myon Bae; Eun Hee Kim
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2016-10-21

8.  Does breast density measured through population-based screening independently increase breast cancer risk in Asian females?

Authors:  Boyoung Park; Hye Mi Cho; Eun Hye Lee; Seunghoon Song; Mina Suh; Kui Son Choi; Bong Joo Kang; Kyungran Ko; Ann Yi; Hae Kyoung Jung; Joo Hee Cha; Jae Kwan Jun
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.790

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.