Literature DB >> 20132995

Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of routine meat inspection of Danish slaughter pigs using Latent Class Analysis.

Marianne Bonde1, Nils Toft, Peter T Thomsen, Jan Tind Sørensen.   

Abstract

Two groups of observers, regular meat inspectors and two veterinary researchers, respectively, conducted independent veterinary meat inspection of organs of slaughter pigs from organic or conventional production systems slaughtered at one abattoir in April 2005. A total of 3054 pigs (899 organic and 2155 conventional) were examined. The observed pathological disorders were grouped in four categories; respiratory disorders (RESP), parasitic disorders (PAR), intestinal disorders (INT) and heart disorders (HEART). Using a latent class model, the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of meat inspectors and researchers were estimated without the assumption of an available gold standard. The Se for the regular meat inspection was found to be 0.92, 0.16, 0.24 and 0.49 for RESP, PAR, INT and HEART, respectively. The Se for the researchers was found to be 0.81, 0.96, 0.91 and 0.68 for RESP, PAR, INT and HEART, respectively. The Sp for the regular meat inspection was found to be between 0.98 and 1.00 for the four categories. The Sp for the researchers was found to be 0.83, 0.94, 0.76 and 0.99 for RESP, PAR, INT and HEART, respectively. The low Se of ordinary meat inspection for parasitic, intestinal and heart disorders will cause a significant underestimation of the prevalence of diseases reported to the pig producers. Based on our results the true prevalence of diseases (conventional vs. organic slaughter pigs) was (in %): 42 vs. 16, 5 vs. 51, 5 vs. 12 and 9 vs. 5 for RESP, PAR, INT and HEART, respectively. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20132995     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  12 in total

Review 1.  Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.

Authors:  John Collins; Minh Huynh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Good animal welfare makes economic sense: potential of pig abattoir meat inspection as a welfare surveillance tool.

Authors:  Sarah Harley; Simon More; Laura Boyle; Niamh O' Connell; Alison Hanlon
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.146

3.  Identifying associations between pig pathologies using a multi-dimensional machine learning methodology.

Authors:  Manuel J Sanchez-Vazquez; Mirjam Nielen; Sandra A Edwards; George J Gunn; Fraser I Lewis
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Contribution of Meat Inspection to the surveillance of poultry health and welfare in the European Union.

Authors:  A Huneau-Salaün; K D C Stärk; A Mateus; C Lupo; A Lindberg; S LE Bouquin-Leneveu
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  Comparison of recording of pericarditis and lung disorders at routine meat inspection with findings at systematic health monitoring in Danish finisher pigs.

Authors:  Søren S Nielsen; Gitte B Nielsen; Matthew J Denwood; John Haugegaard; Hans Houe
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 1.695

6.  Meat inspection of reindeer - a rich source of data for monitoring food safety and animal and environmental health in Sweden.

Authors:  Arja Helena Kautto; Ivar Vågsholm; Rauni Niskanen
Journal:  Infect Ecol Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-18

7.  A comment on the paper 'A comparison between lesions found during meat inspection of finishing pigs raised under organic/free-range conditions and conventional indoor conditions' by Alban et al. 2015.

Authors:  Jan Tind Sørensen
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2016-06-09

8.  The Welfare of Cattle, Sheep, Goats and Pigs from the Perspective of Traumatic Injuries Detected at Slaughterhouse Postmortem Inspection.

Authors:  Lenka Valkova; Vladimir Vecerek; Eva Voslarova; Michal Kaluza; Daniela Takacova
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Agricultural Holdings and Slaughterhouses' Impact on Patterns of Pathological Findings Observed during Post-Mortem Meat Inspection.

Authors:  Johannes Klinger; Beate Conrady; Marina Mikula; Annemarie Käsbohrer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Pig Abattoir Inspection Data: Can It Be Used for Surveillance Purposes?

Authors:  Carla Correia-Gomes; Richard P Smith; Jude I Eze; Madeleine K Henry; George J Gunn; Susanna Williamson; Sue C Tongue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.