Jared W Young1, Mark A Geyer. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. jaredyoung@ucsd.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Modafinil is prescribed for the treatment of narcolepsy. It has been postulated that modafinil might treat cognitive disruption in neuropsychiatric disorders. The mechanisms underlying such modafinil-induced improvements in performance have yet to be delineated however. Recent evidence suggests that modafinil might block the dopamine transporter (DAT) and that the dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) might contribute to modafinil effects. METHODS: Dopamine D1R wildtype (WT), heterozygous (HT), and knockout (KO) mice received vehicle, modafinil, or the selective DAT blocker GBR12909 in a progressive ratio breakpoint study. RESULTS: Both modafinil and GBR12909 increased motivation in the task as measured by an increase in breakpoint in WT and HT mice. These drug-induced increases in motivation were reduced in dopamine D1R HT mice relative to their WT littermates. The D1R KO mice did not respond in the task. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that modafinil increases motivation. Moreover, given the similarity of effects with GBR12909, the data corroborate evidence that the behavioral effects of modafinil might be due to DAT inhibition. Furthermore, the dopamine D1R might play a downstream role in mediating modafinil-induced increases in motivation. Thus, studies reporting cognition-enhancing effects of modafinil might have been influenced by its ability to increase motivation. Copyright 2010 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND:Modafinil is prescribed for the treatment of narcolepsy. It has been postulated that modafinil might treat cognitive disruption in neuropsychiatric disorders. The mechanisms underlying such modafinil-induced improvements in performance have yet to be delineated however. Recent evidence suggests that modafinil might block the dopamine transporter (DAT) and that the dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) might contribute to modafinil effects. METHODS:Dopamine D1R wildtype (WT), heterozygous (HT), and knockout (KO) mice received vehicle, modafinil, or the selective DAT blocker GBR12909 in a progressive ratio breakpoint study. RESULTS: Both modafinil and GBR12909 increased motivation in the task as measured by an increase in breakpoint in WT and HT mice. These drug-induced increases in motivation were reduced in dopamine D1R HT mice relative to their WT littermates. The D1R KO mice did not respond in the task. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that modafinil increases motivation. Moreover, given the similarity of effects with GBR12909, the data corroborate evidence that the behavioral effects of modafinil might be due to DAT inhibition. Furthermore, the dopamine D1R might play a downstream role in mediating modafinil-induced increases in motivation. Thus, studies reporting cognition-enhancing effects of modafinil might have been influenced by its ability to increase motivation. Copyright 2010 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Bertha K Madras; Zhihua Xie; Zhicheng Lin; Amy Jassen; Helen Panas; Laurie Lynch; Ryan Johnson; Eli Livni; Thomas J Spencer; Ali A Bonab; Gregory M Miller; Alan J Fischman Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2006-08-02 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: William W Stoops; Joshua A Lile; Mark T Fillmore; Paul E A Glaser; Craig R Rush Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2005-09-29 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Stefani N Von Huben; Sophia A Davis; Christopher C Lay; Simon N Katner; Rebecca D Crean; Michael A Taffe Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: S Barak Caine; Morgane Thomsen; Kara I Gabriel; Jill S Berkowitz; Lisa H Gold; George F Koob; Susumu Tonegawa; Jianhua Zhang; Ming Xu Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2007-11-28 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Jordy van Enkhuizen; Mark A Geyer; Arpi Minassian; William Perry; Brook L Henry; Jared W Young Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Dara G Ghahremani; Golnaz Tabibnia; John Monterosso; Gerhard Hellemann; Russell A Poldrack; Edythe D London Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Jared W Young; Mary E Kamenski; Kerin K Higa; Gregory A Light; Mark A Geyer; Xianjin Zhou Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Morgane Milienne-Petiot; James P Kesby; Mary Graves; Jordy van Enkhuizen; Svetlana Semenova; Arpi Minassian; Athina Markou; Mark A Geyer; Jared W Young Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Jared W Young; J David Jentsch; Timothy J Bussey; Tanya L Wallace; Daniel M Hutcheson Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 8.989