Literature DB >> 20132599

Determination of ideal offset for spatially offset Raman spectroscopy.

Jason R Maher1, Andrew J Berger.   

Abstract

A key design parameter in spatially offset Raman spectroscopy (SORS) is the choice of offset distance between the illumination and collection areas. To investigate this choice, we performed SORS measurements on a simple two-layer chemical phantom. We show that while the SORS ratio, or the ratio of signal from the bottom layer to the top layer, monotonically increases with spatial offset, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) does not. Specifically, we show that there exists a specific spatial offset that yields the best SNR for signal originating in the bottom layer of a two-layer sample. We also show that this SNR-optimal offset depends upon the strength of the particular Raman band. This work presents the considerations that should be taken into account when designing optical probes for use in SORS.

Year:  2010        PMID: 20132599     DOI: 10.1366/000370210790571936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Spectrosc        ISSN: 0003-7028            Impact factor:   2.388


  10 in total

1.  Sensitivity of coded aperture Raman spectroscopy to analytes beneath turbid biological tissue and tissue-simulating phantoms.

Authors:  Jason R Maher; Thomas E Matthews; Ashley K Reid; David F Katz; Adam Wax
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Co-localized confocal Raman spectroscopy and optical coherence tomography (CRS-OCT) for depth-resolved analyte detection in tissue.

Authors:  Jason R Maher; Oranat Chuchuen; Marcus H Henderson; Sanghoon Kim; Matthew T Rinehart; Angela D M Kashuba; Adam Wax; David F Katz
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Determination of best Raman spectroscopy spatial offsets for transcutaneous bone quality assessments in human hands.

Authors:  Keren Chen; Christine Massie; Hani A Awad; Andrew J Berger
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 4.  Compositional assessment of bone by Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Mustafa Unal; Rafay Ahmed; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.616

5.  Calibration Technique for Suppressing Residual Etalon Artifacts in Slit-Averaged Raman Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Christine Massie; Keren Chen; Andrew J Berger
Journal:  Appl Spectrosc       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  Mechanisms of bone fragility in a mouse model of glucocorticoid-treated rheumatoid arthritis: implications for insufficiency fracture risk.

Authors:  Masahiko Takahata; Jason R Maher; Subhash C Juneja; Jason Inzana; Lianping Xing; Edward M Schwarz; Andrew J Berger; Hani A Awad
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-11

7.  Overconstrained library-based fitting method reveals age- and disease-related differences in transcutaneous Raman spectra of murine bones.

Authors:  Jason R Maher; Jason A Inzana; Hani A Awad; Andrew J Berger
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Improved prediction of femoral fracture toughness in mice by combining standard medical imaging with Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Christine Massie; Emma Knapp; Keren Chen; Andrew J Berger; Hani A Awad
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Influence of tissue absorption and scattering on the depth dependent sensitivity of Raman fiber probes investigated by Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Carina Reble; Ingo Gersonde; Chad A Lieber; Jürgen Helfmann
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 10.  Raman Plus X: Biomedical Applications of Multimodal Raman Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Nandan K Das; Yichuan Dai; Peng Liu; Chuanzhen Hu; Lieshu Tong; Xiaoya Chen; Zachary J Smith
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.