Literature DB >> 2013149

Effect of volume loading, pressure loading, and inotropic stimulation on left ventricular torsion in humans.

D E Hansen1, G T Daughters, E L Alderman, N B Ingels, E B Stinson, D C Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The transmural distribution of fiber angles and the extent of shortening among obliquely oriented fibers are likely to be major determinants of the twisting motion that accompanies left ventricular (LV) ejection. As such, measurements of torsion may provide useful information about LV contractile function, but other factors, such as ventricular loading conditions, may also regulate this motion. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Torsion angles (theta i) of midventricular and apical regions were measured relative to a reference minor axis near the base in seven human cardiac allografts from biplane radiographic images of metallic midwall markers. Pressure loading with methoxamine (5-10 muk/kg/min) increased LV end-systolic pressure by 41 +/- 14 mm Hg (p less than 0.0001). Volume loading with normal saline raised LV end-diastolic pressure from 9.9 +/- 5.2 to 19.6 +/- 4.9 mm Hg (p less than 0.0001). These alterations in LV loading conditions were associated with no change in theta i (difference not significant) for any marker site. Inotropic stimulation with dobutamine (5 micrograms/kg/min) increased values of theta i by as much as twofold (p less than 0.05); this response varied considerably depending on marker location, with the middle and apical inferior wall and the apical lateral wall being the most sensitive. When the marker site associated with the largest torsion angle (theta max) was considered in each patient, dobutamine increased theta max in all cases (25.2 +/- 10.5 degrees versus 15.8 +/- 7.7 degrees, p less than 0.001), whereas pressure and volume loading had negligible effects. This 59% increase in theta max was greater than that of conventional load-dependent indexes of LV systolic performance such as stroke volume (16%), ejection fraction (22%), and maximum rate of LV pressure rise (52%).
CONCLUSIONS: This component of LV motion is relatively insensitive to alterations in preload and afterload, while changes in contractile state influence LV torsion in a regionally heterogeneous manner. Quantification of LV torsion may, therefore, provide a sensitive and relatively load-independent measure of contractile performance that may prove to be useful in the serial assessment of LV function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2013149     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.83.4.1315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  34 in total

1.  Come on, baby, let's do the twist: detecting and correcting cardiac torsion effects in myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Jonathan M Links; Lewis C Becker
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Altered in vivo left ventricular torsion and principal strains in hypothyroid rats.

Authors:  Yong Chen; Aleefia Somji; Xin Yu; Julian E Stelzer
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 3.  Left ventricular rotation: a neglected aspect of the cardiac cycle.

Authors:  Stefan Bloechlinger; Wilhelm Grander; Juerg Bryner; Martin W Dünser
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Evaluation of left ventricular rotation by two-dimensional speckle tracking method and real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with MRI tagging method.

Authors:  Hidetaka Hayashi; Chisato Izumi; Shuichi Takahashi; Masato Uchikoshi; Ryou Yamazaki; Toshihiko Asanuma; Fuminobu Ishikura; Shintaro Beppu; Satoshi Nakatani
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-12-15

5.  Assessment of subendocardial vs. subepicardial left ventricular twist using tagged MRI images.

Authors:  Vahid Tavakoli; Nima Sahba
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-04

6.  Ventricular structure, function, and mechanics at high altitude: chronic remodeling in Sherpa vs. short-term lowlander adaptation.

Authors:  Mike Stembridge; Philip N Ainslie; Michael G Hughes; Eric J Stöhr; James D Cotter; Amanda Q X Nio; Rob Shave
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-05-29

7.  Quantification of myocardial strain at early systole in mouse heart: restoration of undeformed tagging grid with single-point HARP.

Authors:  Wei Li; Xin Yu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Noninvasive evaluation of left ventricular noncompaction: what's new in 2009?

Authors:  Benjamin W Eidem
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Left ventricular strain and untwist in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: relation to exercise capacity.

Authors:  Khalid Abozguia; Ganesh Nallur-Shivu; Thanh T Phan; Ibrar Ahmed; Rajat Kalra; Rebekah A Weaver; William J McKenna; John E Sanderson; Perry Elliott; Michael P Frenneaux
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  How does the left ventricle work? Ventricular rotation as a new index of cardiac performance.

Authors:  Jae-Kwan Song
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.