Literature DB >> 20131088

Long-term evaluation of genetic counseling following false-positive newborn screen for cystic fibrosis.

Laura Cavanagh1, Cecilia J Compton, Audrey Tluczek, Roger L Brown, Philip M Farrell.   

Abstract

This cross-sectional mixed method study was a long-term follow-up evaluation of families who participated in an earlier survey of their understanding of cystic fibrosis (CF) genetics and their infants' false-positive CF newborn screening (NBS) results. Thirty-seven of the original 138 parents participated in the follow-up telephone survey. Results showed parents who received genetic counseling at the time of their infants' diagnostic sweat tests had significantly higher long-term retention of genetic knowledge than those without genetic counseling. However, both groups still had misconceptions and lacked accurate information about the actual risk associated with being a CF carrier. Most parents either had already informed (65%) or planned to inform (19%) their children about the child's carrier status. Mean child age at the time of disclosure was 9.2 years. Situational prompts were the most common reasons for informing their children. Neither parental knowledge, medical literacy, nor parental education predicted whether parents informed their children about their carrier status. False-positive NBS results for CF were not associated with parental perceptions of child vulnerability 11-14 years after the testing. Although the sample from this study was small, these findings underscore the benefits of genetic counseling at the time of the diagnostic sweat test and offer information that can assist parents in talking with their children about the implications of having one CFTR mutation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20131088      PMCID: PMC2859030          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-009-9274-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  27 in total

1.  Implications of carrier identification in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  E P Parsons; A J Clarke; D M Bradley
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  What do young people think about screening for cystic fibrosis?

Authors:  E Cobb; S Holloway; R Elton; J A Raeburn
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis through neonatal screening prevents severe malnutrition and improves long-term growth. Wisconsin Cystic Fibrosis Neonatal Screening Study Group.

Authors:  P M Farrell; M R Kosorok; M J Rock; A Laxova; L Zeng; H C Lai; G Hoffman; R H Laessig; M L Splaingard
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Ethical issues with genetic testing in pediatrics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Genetic counseling and neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis: an assessment of the communication process.

Authors:  D J Ciske; A Haavisto; A Laxova; L Z Rock; P M Farrell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  The child vulnerability scale: an instrument to measure parental perceptions of child vulnerability.

Authors:  B W Forsyth; S M Horwitz; J M Leventhal; J Burger; P J Leaf
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  1996-02

7.  Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy.

Authors:  Lisa D Chew; Katharine A Bradley; Edward J Boyko
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Six month impact of false positives in an Australian infant hearing screening programme.

Authors:  Z Poulakis; M Barker; M Wake
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Effect of expanded newborn screening for biochemical genetic disorders on child outcomes and parental stress.

Authors:  Susan E Waisbren; Simone Albers; Steve Amato; Mary Ampola; Thomas G Brewster; Laurie Demmer; Roger B Eaton; Robert Greenstein; Mark Korson; Cecilia Larson; Deborah Marsden; Michael Msall; Edwin W Naylor; Siegfried Pueschel; Margretta Seashore; Vivian E Shih; Harvey L Levy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Genetic counseling after implementation of statewide cystic fibrosis newborn screening: Two years' experience in one medical center.

Authors:  P G Wheeler; R Smith; H Dorkin; R B Parad; A M Comeau; D W Bianchi
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  8 in total

1.  Psychosocial Distress and Knowledge Deficiencies in Parents of Children in Ireland Who Carry an Altered Cystic Fibrosis Gene.

Authors:  S J Quigley; B Linnane; S Connellan; A Ward; P Ryan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  A Rapid Systematic Review of Outcomes Studies in Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Lisa Madlensky; Angela M Trepanier; Deborah Cragun; Barbara Lerner; Kristen M Shannon; Heather Zierhut
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Assessment of Parental Understanding of Positive Newborn Screening Results and Carrier Status for Cystic Fibrosis with the use of a Short Educational Video.

Authors:  R Temme; A Gruber; M Johnson; L Read; Y Lu; J McNamara
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  A tailored approach to family-centered genetic counseling for cystic fibrosis newborn screening: the Wisconsin model.

Authors:  Audrey Tluczek; Christina Zaleski; Dania Stachiw-Hietpas; Peggy Modaff; Craig R Adamski; Megan R Nelson; Catherine A Reiser; Sumedha Ghate; Kevin D Josephson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A qualitative secondary evaluation of statewide follow-up interviews for abnormal newborn screening results for cystic fibrosis and sickle cell hemoglobinopathy.

Authors:  Alison La Pean; Jenelle L Collins; Stephanie A Christopher; Kerry L Eskra; Sara J Roedl; Audrey Tluczek; Michael H Farrell
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 6.  Bridging the Gap between Scientific Advancement and Real-World Application: Pediatric Genetic Counseling for Common Syndromes and Single-Gene Disorders.

Authors:  Julie A McGlynn; Elinor Langfelder-Schwind
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.159

Review 7.  The Impact of the CFTR Gene Discovery on Cystic Fibrosis Diagnosis, Counseling, and Preventive Therapy.

Authors:  Philip M Farrell; Michael J Rock; Mei W Baker
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  When to break the news and whose responsibility is it? A cross-sectional qualitative study of health professionals' views regarding disclosure of BRCA genetic cancer risk.

Authors:  Alison Luk Young; Phyllis N Butow; Katherine M Tucker; Claire E Wakefield; Emma Healey; Rachel Williams
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.