BACKGROUND: Non-adherence to essential medications represents an important public health problem. Little is known about the frequency with which patients fail to fill prescriptions when new medications are started ("primary non-adherence") or predictors of failure to fill. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate primary non-adherence in community-based practices and identify predictors of non-adherence. PARTICIPANTS: 75,589 patients treated by 1,217 prescribers in the first year of a community-based e-prescribing initiative. DESIGN: We compiled all e-prescriptions written over a 12-month period and used filled claims to identify filled prescriptions. We calculated primary adherence and non-adherence rates for all e-prescriptions and for new medication starts and compared the rates across patient and medication characteristics. Using multivariable regressions analyses, we examined which characteristics were associated with non-adherence. MAIN MEASURES: Primary medication non-adherence. KEY RESULTS: Of 195,930 e-prescriptions, 151,837 (78%) were filled. Of 82,245 e-prescriptions for new medications, 58,984 (72%) were filled. Primary adherence rates were higher for prescriptions written by primary care specialists, especially pediatricians (84%). Patients aged 18 and younger filled prescriptions at the highest rate (87%). In multivariate analyses, medication class was the strongest predictor of adherence, and non-adherence was common for newly prescribed medications treating chronic conditions such as hypertension (28.4%), hyperlipidemia (28.2%), and diabetes (31.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Many e-prescriptions were not filled. Previous studies of medication non-adherence failed to capture these prescriptions. Efforts to increase primary adherence could dramatically improve the effectiveness of medication therapy. Interventions that target specific medication classes may be most effective.
BACKGROUND: Non-adherence to essential medications represents an important public health problem. Little is known about the frequency with which patients fail to fill prescriptions when new medications are started ("primary non-adherence") or predictors of failure to fill. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate primary non-adherence in community-based practices and identify predictors of non-adherence. PARTICIPANTS: 75,589 patients treated by 1,217 prescribers in the first year of a community-based e-prescribing initiative. DESIGN: We compiled all e-prescriptions written over a 12-month period and used filled claims to identify filled prescriptions. We calculated primary adherence and non-adherence rates for all e-prescriptions and for new medication starts and compared the rates across patient and medication characteristics. Using multivariable regressions analyses, we examined which characteristics were associated with non-adherence. MAIN MEASURES: Primary medication non-adherence. KEY RESULTS: Of 195,930 e-prescriptions, 151,837 (78%) were filled. Of 82,245 e-prescriptions for new medications, 58,984 (72%) were filled. Primary adherence rates were higher for prescriptions written by primary care specialists, especially pediatricians (84%). Patients aged 18 and younger filled prescriptions at the highest rate (87%). In multivariate analyses, medication class was the strongest predictor of adherence, and non-adherence was common for newly prescribed medications treating chronic conditions such as hypertension (28.4%), hyperlipidemia (28.2%), and diabetes (31.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Many e-prescriptions were not filled. Previous studies of medication non-adherence failed to capture these prescriptions. Efforts to increase primary adherence could dramatically improve the effectiveness of medication therapy. Interventions that target specific medication classes may be most effective.
Authors: William H Shrank; Sarah A Fox; Adele Kirk; Susan L Ettner; Clairessa H Cantrell; Peter Glassman; Steven M Asch Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: P Michael Ho; John S Rumsfeld; Frederick A Masoudi; David L McClure; Mary E Plomondon; John F Steiner; David J Magid Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2006-09-25
Authors: Nirav R Shah; Annemarie G Hirsch; Christopher Zacker; Scott Taylor; G Craig Wood; Walter F Stewart Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: William H Shrank; Tuyen Hoang; Susan L Ettner; Peter A Glassman; Kavita Nair; Dee DeLapp; June Dirstine; Jerry Avorn; Steven M Asch Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2006-02-13
Authors: Allen A Mitchell; Suzanne M Gilboa; Martha M Werler; Katherine E Kelley; Carol Louik; Sonia Hernández-Díaz Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-04-22 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Andrew J Karter; Melissa M Parker; Alyce S Adams; Howard H Moffet; Julie A Schmittdiel; Ameena T Ahmed; Joe V Selby Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Cynthia L Russell; Catherine Ashbaugh; Leanne Peace; Muammer Cetingok; Karen Q Hamburger; Sarah Owens; Deanna Coffey; Andrew W Webb; Donna Hathaway; Rebecca P Winsett; Richard Madsen; Mark R Wakefield Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2013 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.863