Literature DB >> 20130666

Identification and characterization of the critical physically demanding tasks encountered by correctional officers.

Veronica K Jamnik1, Scott G Thomas, Jim A Shaw, Norman Gledhill.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to identify the critical tasks encountered by correctional officers (COs) on the job and to conduct a comprehensive assessment and characterization of the physical demands of these tasks. These are the first steps in developing a fitness screening test for COs in compliance with recent legislation. The most important, physically demanding, and frequently occurring tasks were identified using Delphi methodology, focus groups, and questionnaire responses from 190 experienced front-line COs. These tasks were structured into emergency response scenarios for which a physical and physiological characterization was conducted to verify their relative physical demands analysis. Oxygen consumption and the forces exerted by COs were quantified while they were responding and then controlling and restraining inmates. The female COs used less force than the male COs did to control and restrain the same inmates (body control = 46 vs. 60 kg, wrist hold = 32 vs. 49 kg, and arm retraction = 37 vs. 47 kg) and did not exert their maximal strength during their control and restraint activities. The mean oxygen consumption of the female and male COs while performing the on-the-job tasks was similar (39.5 vs. 38.5 mL.kg-1.min-1). We concluded that the essential components of a fitness screening protocol for CO applicants are cell search, expeditious response, body control, arm restraint, inmate relocation, and an assessment of aerobic fitness. The criterion performance standards for completing these tasks in a circuit were set at the job performance level of safe and efficient female COs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20130666     DOI: 10.1139/H09-121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  8 in total

Review 1.  Whole-body vibration and occupational physical performance: a review.

Authors:  Robert Savage; Daniel Billing; Alistair Furnell; Kevin Netto; Brad Aisbett
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Does the knowledge-to-action (KTA) framework facilitate physical demands analysis development for firefighter injury management and return-to-work planning?

Authors:  Kathryn Sinden; Joy C MacDermid
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-03

3.  The Effects Aerobic Fitness has on Heart Rate Responses for a Custody Assistant Recruit Class Performing a Formation Run.

Authors:  Karly A Rodas; Matthew R Moreno; Ashley M Bloodgood; J Jay Dawes; Joseph M Dulla; Robin M Orr; Robert G Lockie
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-10-01

Review 4.  Developing legally defensible physiological employment standards for prominent physically demanding public safety occupations: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  V Jamnik; R Gumienak; N Gledhill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Physiological employment standards I. Occupational fitness standards: objectively subjective?

Authors:  M J Tipton; G S Milligan; T J Reilly
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Time Spent Working in Custody Influences Work Sample Test Battery Performance of Deputy Sheriffs Compared to Recruits.

Authors:  Robert G Lockie; Robin M Orr; Matthew R Moreno; J Jay Dawes; Joseph M Dulla
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Review of methods to identify the critical job-tasks undertaken by the emergency services.

Authors:  Venturino R Nevola; Maxwell D Lowe; Colin A Marston
Journal:  Work       Date:  2019

8.  The Influence of Aerobic Fitness on Heart Rate Responses of Custody Assistant Recruits during Circuit Training Sessions.

Authors:  Matthew R Moreno; Karly A Rodas; Ashley M Bloodgood; J Jay Dawes; Joseph M Dulla; Robin M Orr; Robert G Lockie
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.