Literature DB >> 23263741

Physiological employment standards I. Occupational fitness standards: objectively subjective?

M J Tipton1, G S Milligan, T J Reilly.   

Abstract

This paper examines the processes involved in the establishment of a minimum occupational fitness standard, with particular reference to the interplay that inevitably occurs between objective measurements and subjective decisions. The areas considered include: the determination of the critical task on which to base a standard; establishing minimum acceptable performance and methods of best practice for the execution of these tasks; determining the physical demands of a task and a reasonable relative workload; producing the final standard. Finally, the impact of the subjective component of the development of an occupational fitness standard on its defensibility is discussed. It is concluded that all standards involve some subjective aspects; the extent of these could be reduced by further research. In the meantime, it would be prudent for those developing standards to detail the rationale, methods and evidence by which subjective decisions were reached, to provide an audit trail for subsequent investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23263741     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-012-2569-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  34 in total

1.  Work-based physiological assessment of physically-demanding trades: a methodological overview.

Authors:  Nigel A S Taylor; Herb Groeller
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci       Date:  2003-03

2.  Survival of the fittest? The scientific basis for the Royal Navy pre-joining fitness test.

Authors:  A J Allsopp; E G Scarpello; S Andrews; R J Pethybridge
Journal:  J R Nav Med Serv       Date:  2003

3.  Development of fitness screening protocols for physically demanding occupations.

Authors:  V K Jamnik; N Gledhill
Journal:  Can J Sport Sci       Date:  1992-09

4.  Scaling physiological measurements for individuals of different body size.

Authors:  A M Nevill; R Ramsbottom; C Williams
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

5.  Occupational fitness standards for beach lifeguards. Phase 2: the development of an easily administered fitness test.

Authors:  T Reilly; C Iggleden; M Gennser; M Tipton
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 1.611

6.  The effect of intracellular pH on contractile function of intact, single fibres of mouse muscle declines with increasing temperature.

Authors:  H Westerblad; J D Bruton; J Lännergren
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Development of physical selection procedures for the British Army. Phase 2: relationship between physical performance tests and criterion tasks.

Authors:  M Rayson; D Holliman; A Belyavin
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Construction, validation, and derivation of performance standards for a fitness test for correctional officer applicants.

Authors:  Veronica K Jamnik; Scott G Thomas; Jamie F Burr; Norman Gledhill
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.665

Review 9.  Developing legally defensible physiological employment standards for prominent physically demanding public safety occupations: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  V Jamnik; R Gumienak; N Gledhill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Validity of Queen's College step test for use with young Indian men.

Authors:  S Chatterjee; P Chatterjee; P S Mukherjee; A Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  8 in total

1.  The effects of thoracic load carriage on maximal ambulatory work tolerance and acceptable work durations.

Authors:  Gregory E Peoples; Daniel S Lee; Sean R Notley; Nigel A S Taylor
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Developing legally defensible physiological employment standards for prominent physically demanding public safety occupations: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  V Jamnik; R Gumienak; N Gledhill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Fit for the frontline? identification of mission-critical auditory tasks (MCATs) carried out by infantry and combat-support personnel.

Authors:  Hannah D Semeraro; Zoë L Bevis; Daniel Rowan; Rachel M van Besouw; Adrian J Allsopp
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

4.  Physical Employment Standards for UK Firefighters: Minimum Muscular Strength and Endurance Requirements.

Authors:  Richard D M Stevenson; Andrew G Siddall; Philip F J Turner; James L J Bilzon
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.162

5.  The new why when designing mandatory medical examinations.

Authors:  Judith K Sluiter
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 1.611

6.  Sex-Specific Changes in Physical Performance Following Military Training: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jo Varley-Campbell; Chris Cooper; Daryl Wilkerson; Sophie Wardle; Julie Greeves; Theo Lorenc
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Review of methods to identify the critical job-tasks undertaken by the emergency services.

Authors:  Venturino R Nevola; Maxwell D Lowe; Colin A Marston
Journal:  Work       Date:  2019

8.  Police Training in Practice: Organization and Delivery According to European Law Enforcement Agencies.

Authors:  Lisanne Kleygrewe; Raôul R D Oudejans; Matthijs Koedijk; R I Vana Hutter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.