PURPOSE: Contact lens wear predisposes to Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis, but the mechanisms involved remain unclear. An in vivo model was used to study lens inoculation conditions enabling disease. METHODS: Custom-made hydrogel contact lenses were fitted to rats after incubation in P. aeruginosa approximately 10(11) cfu/mL (3 hours) or approximately 10(3) cfu/mL (24 hours). Another group was inadvertently inoculated with a suction pen previously used with high inocula, but rinsed in ethanol and stored dry (6 months). Some corneas were tissue paper-blotted to cause fluorescein staining before lens fitting. Contralateral eyes were untreated. Twenty-four hours after disease detection, lenses were transferred to naive rats or examined by confocal microscopy before homogenization to quantify viable bacteria. After lens removal, corneas were washed to collect nonadherent bacteria and were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: All eyes challenged with unworn contaminated lenses developed keratitis after approximately 7 to 10 days. Disease delay and severity were unaffected by inoculum parameters or tissue blotting but occurred sooner with lenses transferred from infected eyes ( approximately 2 days). Worn lenses and corneal washes contained infecting bacteria. Posterior, not anterior, lens surfaces harbored P. aeruginosa biofilms that penetrated the lens matrix. Diseased corneas showed an infiltration of phagocytes and T-lymphocytes. CONCLUSIONS: P. aeruginosa induces keratitis in this lens-wearing model after a single inoculation. Delayed disease onset was interesting considering the greater keratitis risk during extended wear. Infection did not require the disruption of corneal barrier function before lens wear and occurred without exposure to lens care solutions. The data suggest that keratitis involves biofilm formation or other bacterial adaptations in vivo.
PURPOSE: Contact lens wear predisposes to Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis, but the mechanisms involved remain unclear. An in vivo model was used to study lens inoculation conditions enabling disease. METHODS: Custom-made hydrogel contact lenses were fitted to rats after incubation in P. aeruginosa approximately 10(11) cfu/mL (3 hours) or approximately 10(3) cfu/mL (24 hours). Another group was inadvertently inoculated with a suction pen previously used with high inocula, but rinsed in ethanol and stored dry (6 months). Some corneas were tissue paper-blotted to cause fluorescein staining before lens fitting. Contralateral eyes were untreated. Twenty-four hours after disease detection, lenses were transferred to naive rats or examined by confocal microscopy before homogenization to quantify viable bacteria. After lens removal, corneas were washed to collect nonadherent bacteria and were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: All eyes challenged with unworn contaminated lenses developed keratitis after approximately 7 to 10 days. Disease delay and severity were unaffected by inoculum parameters or tissue blotting but occurred sooner with lenses transferred from infected eyes ( approximately 2 days). Worn lenses and corneal washes contained infecting bacteria. Posterior, not anterior, lens surfaces harbored P. aeruginosa biofilms that penetrated the lens matrix. Diseased corneas showed an infiltration of phagocytes and T-lymphocytes. CONCLUSIONS:P. aeruginosa induces keratitis in this lens-wearing model after a single inoculation. Delayed disease onset was interesting considering the greater keratitis risk during extended wear. Infection did not require the disruption of corneal barrier function before lens wear and occurred without exposure to lens care solutions. The data suggest that keratitis involves biofilm formation or other bacterial adaptations in vivo.
Authors: P M Ladage; K Yamamoto; D H Ren; L Li; J V Jester; W M Petroll; J P Bergmanson; H D Cavanagh Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: C K Stover; X Q Pham; A L Erwin; S D Mizoguchi; P Warrener; M J Hickey; F S Brinkman; W O Hufnagle; D J Kowalik; M Lagrou; R L Garber; L Goltry; E Tolentino; S Westbrock-Wadman; Y Yuan; L L Brody; S N Coulter; K R Folger; A Kas; K Larbig; R Lim; K Smith; D Spencer; G K Wong; Z Wu; I T Paulsen; J Reizer; M H Saier; R E Hancock; S Lory; M V Olson Journal: Nature Date: 2000-08-31 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: I A Maltseva; S M J Fleiszig; D J Evans; S Kerr; S S Sidhu; N A McNamara; C Basbaum Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2007-04-14 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Fiona Stapleton; Carl Marfurt; Blanka Golebiowski; Mark Rosenblatt; David Bereiter; Carolyn Begley; Darlene Dartt; Juana Gallar; Carlos Belmonte; Pedram Hamrah; Mark Willcox Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Danielle M Robertson; Larry J Alexander; Joseph A Bonanno; Suzanne M J Fleiszig; Nancy McNamara Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Victoria B Tran; Ye Suel Sung; Suzanne M J Fleiszig; David J Evans; C J Radke Journal: J Colloid Interface Sci Date: 2011-06-13 Impact factor: 8.128
Authors: Matteo M E Metruccio; Stephanie J Wan; Hart Horneman; Abby R Kroken; Aaron B Sullivan; Tan N Truong; James J Mun; Connie K P Tam; Robin Frith; Laurence Welsh; Melanie D George; Carol A Morris; David J Evans; Suzanne M J Fleiszig Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Srihari Narayanan; Rachel L Redfern; William L Miller; Kelly K Nichols; Alison M McDermott Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 5.033