Lee Herrington1, Ian Horsley, Christer Rolf. 1. Directorate of Sport, Exercise and Physiotherapy, University of Salford, Allerton Building, Manchester M6 6PU, United Kingdom. l.c.herrington@salford.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess if joint position sense (JPS) in the shoulder differed between un-injured rugby players, matched control subjects and previously injured rehabilitated rugby players. DESIGN: Mixed design. SETTING: University biomechanics laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 15 asymptomatic professional rugby union players, 15 previously injured professional rugby union players, 15 asymptomatic matched non-rugby playing controls had their JPS assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: JPS was assessed using two criterion angles in the 90 degrees shoulder abduction position (45 degrees and 80 degrees external rotation). RESULTS: The study found a significant difference between groups in error score (p=0.02). The testing angle also had a significant effect on error score (p=0.002), with greater error scores occurring in the mid range position. CONCLUSION: This study showed rugby players to have better JPS than controls, indicating JPS might not be related to injury risk. Poor JPS appears to be related to injury, players having sustained an injury have decreased JPS despite surgery and/or rehabilitation and returning to sport without incident. 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To assess if joint position sense (JPS) in the shoulder differed between un-injured rugby players, matched control subjects and previously injured rehabilitated rugby players. DESIGN: Mixed design. SETTING: University biomechanics laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 15 asymptomatic professional rugby union players, 15 previously injured professional rugby union players, 15 asymptomatic matched non-rugby playing controls had their JPS assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: JPS was assessed using two criterion angles in the 90 degrees shoulder abduction position (45 degrees and 80 degrees external rotation). RESULTS: The study found a significant difference between groups in error score (p=0.02). The testing angle also had a significant effect on error score (p=0.002), with greater error scores occurring in the mid range position. CONCLUSION: This study showed rugby players to have better JPS than controls, indicating JPS might not be related to injury risk. Poor JPS appears to be related to injury, players having sustained an injury have decreased JPS despite surgery and/or rehabilitation and returning to sport without incident. 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Aleksandra Królikowska; Anna Mika; Bartosz Plaskota; Maciej Daszkiewicz; Monika Kentel; Anna Kołcz; Maciej Kentel; Robert Prill; Dorota Diakowska; Paweł Reichert; Artur Stolarczyk; Łukasz Oleksy Journal: Biology (Basel) Date: 2022-04-11
Authors: Yannick J Ehmann; Daniel P Berthold; Sven Reuter; Knut Beitzel; Robin Köhler; Fabian Stöcker; Lukas N Muench; Jonas Pogorzelski; Marco-Christopher Rupp; Sepp Braun; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan Buchmann Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-11-06 Impact factor: 4.114