Johanna Meisner1, Andreas Meyer1, Bernd Polivka1, Johann H Karstens1, Michael Bremer2,3. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany. bremer.michael@mh-hannover.de. 3. Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Spezielle Onkologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. bremer.michael@mh-hannover.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Efficacy and safety of the own single-center experience with moderately dosed radiosurgery (SRS) for limited (one to four) brain metastases were analyzed and correlated with patient- and treatment-related variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 05/1998 and 10/2006, 93 patients received SRS for a total of 142 brain metastases. The median number of brain metastases treated per patient was one (range, one to four). 46 patients (49%) received initial SRS alone, 13 patients (14%) SRS with up-front whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and 34 patients (37%) SRS for recurrent metastases after WBRT. Median dose was 16 Gy (range, 10-20 Gy). RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months. The actuarial 6- and 12-month data for OS were 60% and 35%, for local brain control (LBC) 87% and 79%, and for distant brain control (DBC) 48% and 37%, respectively. Only ten of 46 patients (22%) with initial SRS alone ultimately received WBRT. Ten patients suffered from seizures within 3 months after SRS, six of them showed brain progression on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 20 patients required reinstitution of steroids following SRS, 16 of these due to brain progression. Five patients received positron emission tomography scan of the brain revealing radionecrosis in two patients. In uni- and multivariate analysis, only time interval between diagnosis of primary and brain metastases (p = 0.031) and volume of treated metastasis (p = 0.02) were significant predictors of OS. Neither up-front WBRT nor dose had a significant influence on LBC. CONCLUSION: Moderately dosed SRS of limited brain metastases was found to be both effective and safe. Initial SRS only may be offered to informed patients complying with MRI-based follow-up.
PURPOSE: Efficacy and safety of the own single-center experience with moderately dosed radiosurgery (SRS) for limited (one to four) brain metastases were analyzed and correlated with patient- and treatment-related variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 05/1998 and 10/2006, 93 patients received SRS for a total of 142 brain metastases. The median number of brain metastases treated per patient was one (range, one to four). 46 patients (49%) received initial SRS alone, 13 patients (14%) SRS with up-front whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and 34 patients (37%) SRS for recurrent metastases after WBRT. Median dose was 16 Gy (range, 10-20 Gy). RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months. The actuarial 6- and 12-month data for OS were 60% and 35%, for local brain control (LBC) 87% and 79%, and for distant brain control (DBC) 48% and 37%, respectively. Only ten of 46 patients (22%) with initial SRS alone ultimately received WBRT. Ten patients suffered from seizures within 3 months after SRS, six of them showed brain progression on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 20 patients required reinstitution of steroids following SRS, 16 of these due to brain progression. Five patients received positron emission tomography scan of the brain revealing radionecrosis in two patients. In uni- and multivariate analysis, only time interval between diagnosis of primary and brain metastases (p = 0.031) and volume of treated metastasis (p = 0.02) were significant predictors of OS. Neither up-front WBRT nor dose had a significant influence on LBC. CONCLUSION: Moderately dosed SRS of limited brain metastases was found to be both effective and safe. Initial SRS only may be offered to informed patients complying with MRI-based follow-up.
Authors: E Shaw; C Scott; L Souhami; R Dinapoli; R Kline; J Loeffler; N Farnan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: P K Sneed; K R Lamborn; J M Forstner; M W McDermott; S Chang; E Park; P H Gutin; T L Phillips; W M Wara; D A Larson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1999-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: David W Andrews; Charles B Scott; Paul W Sperduto; Adam E Flanders; Laurie E Gaspar; Michael C Schell; Maria Werner-Wasik; William Demas; Janice Ryu; Jean-Paul Bahary; Luis Souhami; Marvin Rotman; Minesh P Mehta; Walter J Curran Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-05-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Maximilian I Ruge; Martin Kocher; Mohammad Maarouf; Christina Hamisch; Harald Treuer; Jürgen Voges; Volker Sturm Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Paweł Blecharz; Krzysztof Urbański; Anna Mucha-Małecka; Krzysztof Małecki; Marian Reinfuss; Jerzy Jakubowicz; Piotr Skotnicki Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2011-11-17 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Selvan Rajakesari; Nils D Arvold; Rachel B Jimenez; Laura W Christianson; Margaret C Horvath; Elizabeth B Claus; Alexandra J Golby; Mark D Johnson; Ian F Dunn; Eudocia Q Lee; Nancy U Lin; Scott Friesen; Edward G Mannarino; Matthew Wagar; Fred L Hacker; Stephanie E Weiss; Brian M Alexander Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 4.130