Literature DB >> 20127123

Standard and limitation of intraoperative monitoring of the visual evoked potential.

Kunihiko Kodama1, Tetsuya Goto, Atsushi Sato, Keiichi Sakai, Yuichiro Tanaka, Kazuhiro Hongo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Visual evoked potential (VEP) has been installed as one of the intraoperative visual function monitoring. It remains unclear, however, whether intraoperative VEP monitoring facilitates as a real time visual function monitoring with satisfactory effectiveness and sensitivity. To evaluate this, relationships between VEP waveform changes and postoperative visual function were analysed retrospectively.
METHODS: Intraoperative VEP monitoring was carried out for 106 sides (eyes) in 53 surgeries, including two intraorbital, 36 parasellar and 15 cortical lesions in Shinshu University Hospital under total intravenous anaesthesia. Red light flash stimulation was provided to each eye independently. VEP recording and postoperative visual function were analysed.
RESULTS: In 103 out of 106 sides (97%), steady VEP monitoring was recorded. Stable VEP was acquired from eyes having corrected visual acuity greater than 0.4. VEP was not recorded in one side with corrected visual acuity of 0.3 and two sides in whom sevoflurane was used incidentally for anaesthesia. Transient VEP decrease was observed in three sides, but visual function was preserved. Permanent VEP decrease was seen in seven sides, which presented visual impairment postoperatively. In one side, visual acuity improved but minor visual field defect was encountered postoperatively, though VEP unchanged throughout the surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative monitoring of VEP predicts postoperative visual function: reversible change in VEP means visual function to be preserved. Visual field defect without decrease in the visual acuity may not be predicted by VEP monitoring. Intraoperative VEP monitoring will be mandatory for surgeries harbouring a risk of visual impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20127123     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-010-0600-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  23 in total

1.  Intraoperative flash VEPs are reproducible in the presence of low amplitude EEG.

Authors:  David A Houlden; Chantal A Turgeon; Thomas Polis; John Sinclair; Stuart Coupland; Pierre Bourque; Martin Corsten; Amin Kassam
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Optic nerve potentials and cortical potentials after stimulation of the anterior visual pathway during neurosurgery.

Authors:  Mitja Benedičič; Roman Bošnjak
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring during an optic nerve schwannoma removal.

Authors:  Daniel San-Juan; Manuel Escanio Cortés; Martha Tena-Suck; Adolfo Josué Orozco Garduño; Jesús Alejandro López Pizano; Jonathan Villanueva Domínguez; Maricarmen Fernández Gónzalez-Aragón; Juan Luis Gómez-Amador
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Surgical Approaches to the Orbit: A Neurosurgical Perspective.

Authors:  Zeid Abussuud; Shahzada Ahmed; Alessandro Paluzzi
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-09-09

5.  A pilot study to record visual evoked potentials during prone spine surgery using the SightSaver™ photic visual stimulator.

Authors:  E M Soffin; R G Emerson; J Cheng; K Mercado; K Smith; J D Beckman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Cortical potentials after electrical intraneural stimulation of the optic nerve during orbital enucleation.

Authors:  Mitja Benedičič; Matej Beltram; Brigita Drnovšek Olup; Roman Bošnjak
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  [Traumatic optic nerve neuropathy. Longterm results following microsurgical optic nerve decompression].

Authors:  H-J Welkoborsky; H Möbius; L Bauer; B Wiechens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Effectiveness of intraoperative visual evoked potential in avoiding visual deterioration during endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors.

Authors:  Kentaro Toyama; Masahiko Wanibuchi; Toshimi Honma; Katsuya Komatsu; Yukinori Akiyama; Takeshi Mikami; Nobuhiro Mikuni
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 9.  Intra-operative neurophysiological mapping and monitoring during brain tumour surgery in children: an update.

Authors:  Angela Coppola; Vincenzo Tramontano; Federica Basaldella; Chiara Arcaro; Giovanna Squintani; Francesco Sala
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Differential effects of sevoflurane and propofol on an electroretinogram and visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Ryusuke Tanaka; Satoshi Tanaka; Takashi Ichino; Takashi Ishida; Satoshi Fuseya; Mikito Kawamata
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.