Literature DB >> 31950267

Differential effects of sevoflurane and propofol on an electroretinogram and visual evoked potentials.

Ryusuke Tanaka1, Satoshi Tanaka2, Takashi Ichino1, Takashi Ishida1, Satoshi Fuseya1, Mikito Kawamata1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to simultaneously evaluate the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on an electroretinogram (ERG) and visual evoked potentials (VEPs). Twenty-four patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were allocated randomly to receive either sevoflurane (group S) or propofol (group P). An ERG and VEPs were recorded in an awake state and during anesthesia with three different minimum alveolar concentrations (MAC; 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5) of sevoflurane in group S or with three different effect-site concentrations (Ce) of 2, 3, and 4 μg/ml by using a target-controlled infusion technique in group P. Sevoflurane and propofol had little effect on amplitudes of the ERG b-wave. Sevoflurane significantly attenuated the amplitudes of VEP N75-P100 at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 MAC. Propofol did not significantly decrease the amplitude of VEPs at Ce of 2 or 3 μg/ml but significantly decreased it at Ce of 4 μg/ml. In summary, propofol and sevoflurane at clinical concentrations had little effect on the amplitude of an ERG. Sevoflurane attenuated the amplitudes of VEPs even at low concentrations. Propofol also attenuated the amplitudes of VEPs to a lesser extent compared to sevoflurane.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electroretinogram; Propofol; Sevoflurane; Visual evoked potentials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31950267     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-020-02733-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  18 in total

1.  Postoperative changes in the full-field electroretinogram following sevoflurane anaesthesia.

Authors:  G Iohom; A Whyte; T Flynn; G O'Connor; G Shorten
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Electrophysiological assessment of optic nerve disease.

Authors:  G E Holder
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Time to revisit VEP monitoring?

Authors:  Georg Neuloh
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Visual evoked cortical magnetic responses to checkerboard pattern reversal stimulation: a study on the neural generators of N75, P100 and N145.

Authors:  H Shigeto; S Tobimatsu; T Yamamoto; T Kobayashi; M Kato
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 3.181

5.  [Changes in the electroretinogram during enflurane anesthesia].

Authors:  M Yagi; C Tashiro; I Yoshiya
Journal:  Masui       Date:  1989-11

6.  Continuous monitoring of the visually evoked response during intra-orbital surgery.

Authors:  J E Wright; G Arden; B R Jones
Journal:  Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K       Date:  1973

7.  Comparison of effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  A M Maguire; N Kumar; J L Parker; D J Rowbotham; J P Thompson
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  The effects of general anesthetics on excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission in area CA1 of the rat hippocampus in vitro.

Authors:  M Wakasugi; K Hirota; S H Roth; Y Ito
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Propofol influences the electroretinogram to a lesser degree than thiopentone.

Authors:  P Tanskanen; T Kylmä; B Kommonen; U Karhunen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.105

10.  Intraoperative monitoring of flash visual evoked potential under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Hironobu Hayashi; Masahiko Kawaguchi
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-03-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  Repeated measurements of ERGs and VEPs using chloral hydrate sedation and propofol anesthesia in young children.

Authors:  Daphne L McCulloch; Pamela Garcia-Filion; Marla Matar; Carly Stewart; Mark S Borchert
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Non-invasive visual evoked potentials under sevoflurane versus ketamine-xylazine in rats.

Authors:  Valerio Castoldi; Raffaele d'Isa; Silvia Marenna; Giancarlo Comi; Letizia Leocani
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-11-09

3.  Normative Data of Ocular Biometry, Optical Coherence Tomography, and Electrophysiology Conducted for Cynomolgus Macaque Monkeys.

Authors:  Kwang-Eon Choi; Vu Thi Que Anh; Cheolmin Yun; Young-Jin Kim; Hachul Jung; Heejong Eom; Dongkwan Shin; Seong-Woo Kim
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.283

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.