Literature DB >> 20124927

Anatomic features of the paramedian muscle-splitting approaches to the lumbar spine.

Daniel J Hoh1, Michael Y Wang, Stephen L Ritland.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intermuscular approaches can expose the lumbar spine and minimize muscular trauma and injury. The segmental anatomy of the posterior lumbar musculature allows surgical access through separation of muscle groups and fascicles and provides one to develop intermuscular working channels while preserving the integrity of the muscles and their function. In addition, preservation of the accompanying neurovascular bundles minimizes blood loss, tissue atrophy, and pain. With these approaches, a variety of procedures for decompression, discectomy, interbody fusion, or pedicle screw fixation can be achieved for single or multiple levels without subperiosteal stripping or muscle transection.
OBJECTIVE: A detailed description of the relevant surgical anatomy for the muscle-sparing approach to the lumbar spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20124927     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000350866.25760.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  11 in total

1.  ALIF and total disc replacement versus 2-level circumferential fusion with TLIF: a prospective, randomized, clinical and radiological trial.

Authors:  Eike K Hoff; Patrick Strube; Matthias Pumberger; Robert K Zahn; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Spine surgery--approach size does matter.

Authors:  J N Alastair Gibson; Susanne Merk; Menno Iprenburg
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 3.  Iatrogenic injury to the erector spinae during posterior lumbar spine surgery: underlying anatomical considerations, preventable root causes, and surgical tips and tricks.

Authors:  Zhi-Jun Hu; Xiang-Qian Fang; Shun-Wu Fan
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-02-17

4.  Can intermuscular cleavage planes provide proper transverse screw angle? Comparison of two paraspinal approaches.

Authors:  Xiaofei Cheng; Bin Ni; Qi Liu; Jinshui Chen; Huapeng Guan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Surgical data and early postoperative outcomes after minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion: results of a prospective, multicenter, observational data-monitored study.

Authors:  Paulo Pereira; David Buzek; Jörg Franke; Wolfgang Senker; Arkadiusz Kosmala; Ulrich Hubbe; Neil Manson; Wout Rosenberg; Roberto Assietti; Frederic Martens; Giovanni Barbanti Brodano; Kai-Michael Scheufler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mast Quadrant-assisted minimally invasive modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: single incision versus double incision.

Authors:  Xin-Lei Xia; Hong-Li Wang; Fei-Zhou Lyu; Li-Xun Wang; Xiao-Sheng Ma; Jian-Yuan Jiang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Modified Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Description of Surgical Technique and Assessment of Free-hand Pedicle Screw Insertion.

Authors:  Peyman Pakzaban
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Modified Mini-Open and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Sudhir Ganesan; Vignesh Jayabalan; Venkatesh Kumar; Karthik Kailash
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-06-04

9.  Posterior paraspinal muscle versus post-middle approach for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wenli Chang; Dianling Zhang; Wei Liu; Xiaodong Lian; Zhenqing Jiao; Wei Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  CT and MRI Determination of Intermuscular Space within Lumbar Paraspinal Muscles at Different Intervertebral Disc Levels.

Authors:  Xuefei Deng; Youzhi Zhu; Shidong Wang; Yu Zhang; Hui Han; Dengquan Zheng; Zihai Ding; Kelvin K L Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.