Literature DB >> 20124539

Risk of deep vein thrombosis following a single negative whole-leg compression ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Stacy A Johnson1, Scott M Stevens, Scott C Woller, Erica Lake, Marco Donadini, Ji Cheng, José Labarère, James D Douketis.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: In patients with suspected lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), compression ultrasound (CUS) is typically the initial test to confirm or exclude DVT. Patients with an initial negative CUS result often require repeat CUS after 5 to 7 days. Whole-leg CUS may exclude proximal and distal DVT in a single evaluation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of venous thromboembolism after withholding anticoagulation in patients with suspected lower extremity DVT following a single negative whole-leg CUS result. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane, and Health Technology Assessments databases were searched for articles published from January 1970 through November 2009. Supplemental searches were performed of Internet resources, reference lists, and by contacting content experts. STUDY SELECTION: Included studies were randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies of patients with suspected DVT and a negative whole-leg CUS result who did not receive anticoagulant therapy, and were followed up at least 90 days for venous thromboembolism events. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently reviewed and extracted data regarding a single positive or negative whole-leg CUS result, occurrence of venous thromboembolism during follow-up, and study quality.
RESULTS: Seven studies were included totaling 4731 patients with negative whole-leg CUS examinations who did not receive anticoagulation. Of these, up to 647 patients (13.7%) had active cancer and up to 725 patients (15.3%) recently underwent a major surgery. Most participants were identified from an ambulatory setting. Venous thromboembolism or suspected venous thromboembolism-related death occurred in 34 patients (0.7%), including 11 patients with distal DVT (32.4%); 7 patients with proximal DVT (20.6%); 7 patients with nonfatal pulmonary emboli (20.6%); and 9 patients (26.5%) who died, possibly related to venous thromboembolism. Using a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting, the combined venous thromboembolism event rate at 3 months was 0.57% (95% confidence interval, 0.25%-0.89%).
CONCLUSION: Withholding anticoagulation following a single negative whole-leg CUS result was associated with a low risk of venous thromboembolism during 3-month follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20124539     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  34 in total

1.  Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Roman Jaeschke; Scott M Stevens; Steven Goodacre; Philip S Wells; Matthew D Stevenson; Clive Kearon; Holger J Schunemann; Mark Crowther; Stephen G Pauker; Regina Makdissi; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Slow femoral venous flow and venous thromboembolism following inguinal hernioplasty in patients without or with low molecular weight heparin prophylaxis.

Authors:  F S Lozano; J Sánchez-Fernández; J R González-Porras; J García-Alovio; J A Santos; R Mateos; I Alberca
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Clive Kearon; Elie A Akl; Anthony J Comerota; Paolo Prandoni; Henri Bounameaux; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael E Nelson; Philip S Wells; Michael K Gould; Francesco Dentali; Mark Crowther; Susan R Kahn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  The ICM research agenda on critical care ultrasonography.

Authors:  P Mayo; R Arntfield; M Balik; P Kory; G Mathis; G Schmidt; M Slama; G Volpicelli; N Xirouchaki; A McLean; A Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  [Diagnostic workup and therapy of acute venous diseases].

Authors:  T Silber; K Schweinzer; A Strölin
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.751

6.  Choosing ultrasound technique for suspected deep vein thrombosis: which is best?

Authors:  Scott M Stevens; Masarret Fazili; Scott C Woller
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-06

Review 7.  Should we diagnose and treat distal deep vein thrombosis?

Authors:  Helia Robert-Ebadi; Marc Righini
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

Review 8.  Imaging of acute pulmonary embolism: an update.

Authors:  Alastair J E Moore; Jason Wachsmann; Murthy R Chamarthy; Lloyd Panjikaran; Yuki Tanabe; Prabhakar Rajiah
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-06

9.  Multiple Venous Thromboses Presenting as Mechanical Low Back Pain in an 18-Year-Old Woman.

Authors:  Andrée-Anne Marchand; Jean-Alexandre Boucher; Julie O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2015-06-30

Review 10.  Controversies in venous thromboembolism: the unique case of isolated distal deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Angelo Porfidia; Annamaria Carnicelli; Nicola Bonadia; Roberto Pola; Raffaele Landolfi
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.