PURPOSE: To establish an imaging approach to visualize the 100-microm-thick hippocampal neuron-generating dentate granule cell layer (DGCL) consistently within a clinically feasible magnetic resonance (MR) imaging duration and to assess its sensitivity by quantifying the likelihood that it will be detected in healthy young adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was HIPAA compliant and institutional review board approved. All subjects provided written informed consent. Ten healthy volunteers (five male subjects, five female subjects; mean age, 26 years +/- 6 [standard deviation]) were imaged at 7.0 T by using a 24-element head coil array with three-dimensional T1-weighted MR imaging for anatomic reference, followed by T2*-weighted gradient-echo (echo time, 25 msec; repetition time, 944 msec) imaging at 232-microm in-plane resolution (0.05-mm(3) pixels) in coronal and sagittal slabs (17 sections at 1 mm thick) over the hippocampus in 14 minutes. The entire study took 45 minutes. RESULTS: The DGCL was consistently visible in all 10 enrolled subjects. All larger subfields were visible in excellent detail and contrast in every subject. CONCLUSION: The spatial resolution and tissue contrast at high field strength (7.0 T) MR imaging can be used to consistently reveal hippocampal morphology down to 100-microm subfields within a clinically acceptable imaging duration. This imaging technique might be used to detect cellular disarray and degenerative changes in this sensitive circuit earlier than at 1.5 T or even 3.0 T. (c) RSNA, 2010.
PURPOSE: To establish an imaging approach to visualize the 100-microm-thick hippocampal neuron-generating dentate granule cell layer (DGCL) consistently within a clinically feasible magnetic resonance (MR) imaging duration and to assess its sensitivity by quantifying the likelihood that it will be detected in healthy young adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was HIPAA compliant and institutional review board approved. All subjects provided written informed consent. Ten healthy volunteers (five male subjects, five female subjects; mean age, 26 years +/- 6 [standard deviation]) were imaged at 7.0 T by using a 24-element head coil array with three-dimensional T1-weighted MR imaging for anatomic reference, followed by T2*-weighted gradient-echo (echo time, 25 msec; repetition time, 944 msec) imaging at 232-microm in-plane resolution (0.05-mm(3) pixels) in coronal and sagittal slabs (17 sections at 1 mm thick) over the hippocampus in 14 minutes. The entire study took 45 minutes. RESULTS: The DGCL was consistently visible in all 10 enrolled subjects. All larger subfields were visible in excellent detail and contrast in every subject. CONCLUSION: The spatial resolution and tissue contrast at high field strength (7.0 T) MR imaging can be used to consistently reveal hippocampal morphology down to 100-microm subfields within a clinically acceptable imaging duration. This imaging technique might be used to detect cellular disarray and degenerative changes in this sensitive circuit earlier than at 1.5 T or even 3.0 T. (c) RSNA, 2010.
Authors: J T Vaughan; M Garwood; C M Collins; W Liu; L DelaBarre; G Adriany; P Andersen; H Merkle; R Goebel; M B Smith; K Ugurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Katherine L Narr; Paul M Thompson; Philip Szeszko; Delbert Robinson; Seonah Jang; Roger P Woods; Sharon Kim; Kiralee M Hayashi; Dina Asunction; Arthur W Toga; Robert M Bilder Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: L S Kegeles; D C Shungu; S Anjilvel; S Chan; S P Ellis; E Xanthopoulos; D Malaspina; J M Gorman; J J Mann; M Laruelle; C A Kaufmann Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2000-05-15 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Girish M Fatterpekar; Thomas P Naidich; Bradley N Delman; Juan G Aguinaldo; S Humayun Gultekin; Chet C Sherwood; Patrick R Hof; Burton P Drayer; Zahi A Fayad Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Scott A Schobel; Nicole M Lewandowski; Cheryl M Corcoran; Holly Moore; Truman Brown; Dolores Malaspina; Scott A Small Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2009-09
Authors: Sandhitsu R Das; Brian B Avants; John Pluta; Hongzhi Wang; Jung W Suh; Michael W Weiner; Susanne G Mueller; Paul A Yushkevich Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-01-28 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Maged Goubran; Boris C Bernhardt; Diego Cantor-Rivera; Jonathan C Lau; Charlotte Blinston; Robert R Hammond; Sandrine de Ribaupierre; Jorge G Burneo; Seyed M Mirsattari; David A Steven; Andrew G Parrent; Andrea Bernasconi; Neda Bernasconi; Terry M Peters; Ali R Khan Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Maged Goubran; David A Rudko; Brendan Santyr; Joe Gati; Trevor Szekeres; Terry M Peters; Ali R Khan Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Paul A Yushkevich; John B Pluta; Hongzhi Wang; Long Xie; Song-Lin Ding; Eske C Gertje; Lauren Mancuso; Daria Kliot; Sandhitsu R Das; David A Wolk Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Linda Marrakchi-Kacem; Alexandre Vignaud; Julien Sein; Johanne Germain; Thomas R Henry; Cyril Poupon; Lucie Hertz-Pannier; Stéphane Lehéricy; Olivier Colliot; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Marie Chupin Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: S Nishimura; T Hirai; Y Shigematsu; M Kitajima; M Morioka; Y Kai; R Minoda; H Uetani; R Murakami; Y Yamashita Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-11-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Thomas R Henry; Marie Chupin; Stéphane Lehéricy; John P Strupp; Michael A Sikora; Zhiyi Y Sha; Kâmil Ugurbil; Pierre-François Van de Moortele Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-07-11 Impact factor: 11.105