BACKGROUND: Investigators use prospective community-based studies to collect longitudinal information on childhood diarrhea. The interval in which data are collected may affect the accuracy and interpretation of results. Our objective was to compare data of reported daily clinical symptoms from surveys conducted daily versus twice-weekly surveys. METHODS: We conducted our study in Lima, Peru, between October and December 2007. We asked 134 mothers to report daily symptoms by using a twice-weekly survey. We conducted daily surveys for the same data on 25% of participants randomly selected each day. We analyzed intersurvey variability by using Cohen's kappa and Signal Detection Theory (SDT). RESULTS: We collected 6157 and 1181 child-days of data through the twice-weekly and daily surveys, respectively. The prevalence of diarrhea, fever, vomiting, and cough were 6.4%, 1.6%, 2.1%, and 22.7% from the twice-weekly survey and, 6.4%, 2.0%, 2.4%, and 26% from the daily survey, respectively. Despite similar prevalence, 20% of days with reported diarrhea were discrepant between the two surveys, and agreement in the report of diarrhea decreased as time between the interviews increased (p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Although twice-weekly surveys provide an adequate estimate of diarrheal prevalence compared with daily surveys, the prevalence of other symptoms based on dichotomous questions was lower under the former. Additionally, the agreement between the two surveys in the report of diarrhea decreased as the recall period increased, suggesting that data from daily interviews were of greater quality. Our analysis is a novel application of SDT to measure respondent certainty and bias, from which better inference about the quality of collected data may be drawn. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Investigators use prospective community-based studies to collect longitudinal information on childhood diarrhea. The interval in which data are collected may affect the accuracy and interpretation of results. Our objective was to compare data of reported daily clinical symptoms from surveys conducted daily versus twice-weekly surveys. METHODS: We conducted our study in Lima, Peru, between October and December 2007. We asked 134 mothers to report daily symptoms by using a twice-weekly survey. We conducted daily surveys for the same data on 25% of participants randomly selected each day. We analyzed intersurvey variability by using Cohen's kappa and Signal Detection Theory (SDT). RESULTS: We collected 6157 and 1181 child-days of data through the twice-weekly and daily surveys, respectively. The prevalence of diarrhea, fever, vomiting, and cough were 6.4%, 1.6%, 2.1%, and 22.7% from the twice-weekly survey and, 6.4%, 2.0%, 2.4%, and 26% from the daily survey, respectively. Despite similar prevalence, 20% of days with reported diarrhea were discrepant between the two surveys, and agreement in the report of diarrhea decreased as time between the interviews increased (p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Although twice-weekly surveys provide an adequate estimate of diarrheal prevalence compared with daily surveys, the prevalence of other symptoms based on dichotomous questions was lower under the former. Additionally, the agreement between the two surveys in the report of diarrhea decreased as the recall period increased, suggesting that data from daily interviews were of greater quality. Our analysis is a novel application of SDT to measure respondent certainty and bias, from which better inference about the quality of collected data may be drawn. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: William Checkley; Gillian Buckley; Robert H Gilman; Ana Mo Assis; Richard L Guerrant; Saul S Morris; Kåre Mølbak; Palle Valentiner-Branth; Claudio F Lanata; Robert E Black Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: William Checkley; Robert H Gilman; Robert E Black; Leonardo D Epstein; Lilia Cabrera; Charles R Sterling; Lawrence H Moulton Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-01-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Maria Clotildes N de Melo; José Augusto de A C Taddei; Daniel R Diniz-Santos; Daniel Simões May; Nadya B Carneiro; Luciana R Silva Journal: Braz J Infect Dis Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 1.949
Authors: Adam R Aluisio; Zabihullah Maroof; Daniel Chandramohan; Jane Bruce; M Zulf Mughal; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Gijs Walraven; Mohammad I Masher; Jeroen H J Ensink; Semira Manaseki-Holland Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: A M S Ahmed; R J S Magalhaes; T Ahmed; K Z Long; MdI Hossain; M M Islam; M Mahfuz; S M A Gaffar; A Sharmeen; R Haque; R L Guerrant; W A Petri; A A Mamun Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Stephanie A Richard; Leah J Barrett; Richard L Guerrant; William Checkley; Mark A Miller Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Philip J Budge; Marie R Griffin; Kathryn M Edwards; John V Williams; Hector Verastegui; Stella M Hartinger; Monika Johnson; Jennifer M Klemenc; Yuwei Zhu; Ana I Gil; Claudio F Lanata; Carlos G Grijalva Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Wolf-Peter Schmidt; Benjamin F Arnold; Sophie Boisson; Bernd Genser; Stephen P Luby; Mauricio L Barreto; Thomas Clasen; Sandy Cairncross Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Adam R Aluisio; Zabihullah Maroof; Daniel Chandramohan; Jane Bruce; Mohammad I Masher; Semira Manaseki-Holland; Jeroen H J Ensink Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ana Lúcia Escobar; Carlos E A Coimbra; James R Welch; Bernardo L Horta; Ricardo Ventura Santos; Andrey M Cardoso Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: A M S Ahmed; T Ahmed; R J Soares Magalhaes; K Z Long; M A Alam; M I Hossain; M M Islam; M Mahfuz; D Mondal; R Haque; A Al Mamun Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 4.434