Literature DB >> 18444767

Response bias in "remembering" emotional stimuli: a new perspective on age differences.

Aycan Kapucu1, Caren M Rotello, Rebecca E Ready, Katharina N Seidl.   

Abstract

Older adults sometimes show a recall advantage for emotionally positive, rather than neutral or negative, stimuli (S. T. Charles, M. Mather, & L. L. Carstensen, 2003). In contrast, younger adults respond "old" and "remember" more often to negative materials in recognition tests. For younger adults, both effects are due to response bias changes rather than to enhanced memory accuracy (S. Dougal & C. M. Rotello, 2007). We presented older and younger adults with emotional and neutral stimuli in a remember-know paradigm. Signal-detection and model-based analyses showed that memory accuracy did not differ for the neutral, negative, and positive stimuli, and that "remember" responses did not reflect the use of recollection. However, both age groups showed large and significant response bias effects of emotion: Younger adults tended to say "old" and "remember" more often in response to negative words than to positive and neutral words, whereas older adults responded "old" and "remember" more often to both positive and negative words than to neutral stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18444767     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  26 in total

1.  False recollection of emotional pictures in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  David A Gallo; Katherine T Foster; Jessica T Wong; David A Bennett
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Influence of encoding instructions and response bias on cross-cultural differences in specific recognition.

Authors:  Laura E Paige; Selen Amado; Angela H Gutchess
Journal:  Cult Brain       Date:  2017-10-24

3.  Emerging perspectives in social neuroscience and neuroeconomics of aging.

Authors:  Lisbeth Nielsen; Mara Mather
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Distinguishing between attributional and mnemonic sources of familiarity: the case of positive emotion bias.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Laura K Stone; Hannah S Hatch; Simone Schnall
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-03

5.  Autobiographical memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: Evidence for a role of inhibitory ability.

Authors:  Aleea L Devitt; Lynette Tippett; Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-12

6.  Familiar smiling faces in Alzheimer's disease: understanding the positivity-related recognition bias.

Authors:  Katja Werheid; Rebecca S McDonald; Nicholas Simmons-Stern; Brandon A Ally; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Emotional content enhances true but not false memory for categorized stimuli.

Authors:  Hae-Yoon Choi; Elizabeth A Kensinger; Suparna Rajaram
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-04

Review 8.  The effects of healthy aging, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease on recollection and familiarity: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 7.444

9.  Multi-Trial Episodic Recall and Recognition of Emotion-Laden Words in First Versus Second Language.

Authors:  Gregory K Shenaut; Beth A Ober
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2021-06

10.  Criterion noise in ratings-based recognition: evidence from the effects of response scale length on recognition accuracy.

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin; Jonathan G Tullis; Ji Hae Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.