Literature DB >> 20122771

What is a cohort effect? Comparison of three statistical methods for modeling cohort effects in obesity prevalence in the United States, 1971-2006.

Katherine M Keyes1, Rebecca L Utz, Whitney Robinson, Guohua Li.   

Abstract

Analysts often use different conceptual definitions of a cohort effect, and therefore different statistical methods, which lead to differing empirical results. A definition often used in sociology assumes that cohorts have unique characteristics confounded by age and period effects, whereas epidemiologists often conceive that period and age effects interact to produce cohort effects. The present study aims to illustrate these differences by estimating age, period, and cohort (APC) effects on obesity prevalence in the U.S. from 1971 to 2006 using both conceptual approaches. Data were drawn from seven cross-sectional waves of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Obesity was defined as BMI >or=30 for adults and >or=95th percentile for children under the age of 20. APC effects were estimated using the classic constraint-based method (first-order effects estimated and interpreted), the Holford method (first-order effects estimated but second-order effects interpreted), and median polish method (second-order effects are estimated and interpreted). Results indicated that all methods report significant age and period effects, with lower obesity prevalence in early life as well as increasing prevalence in successive surveys. Positive cohort effects for more recently born cohorts emerged based on the constraint-based model; when cohort effects were considered second-order estimates, no significant effects emerged. First-order estimates of age-period-cohort effects are often criticized because of their reliance on arbitrary constraints, but may be conceptually meaningful for sociological research questions. Second-order estimates are statistically estimable and produce conceptually meaningful results for epidemiological research questions. Age-period-cohort analysts should explicitly state the definition of a cohort effect under consideration. Our analyses suggest that the prevalence of obesity in the U.S. in the latter part of the 20th century rose across all birth cohorts, in the manner expected based on estimated age and period effects. As such, the absence or presence of cohort effects depends on the conceptual definition and therefore statistical method used. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20122771      PMCID: PMC3469580          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  32 in total

1.  Death-rates in Great Britain and Sweden. Some general regularities and their significance.

Authors:  W O Kermack; A G McKendrick; P L McKinlay
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001.

Authors:  Ali H Mokdad; Earl S Ford; Barbara A Bowman; William H Dietz; Frank Vinicor; Virginia S Bales; James S Marks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Age, period, and cohort effects in demography: a review.

Authors:  J Hobcraft; J Menken; S Preston
Journal:  Popul Index       Date:  1982

Review 4.  The developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Peter D Gluckman; Mark A Hanson
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 12.015

5.  Plan and operation of the health and nutrition examination survey. United states--1971-1973.

Authors:  H W Miller
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 1       Date:  1973-02

6.  The cohort as a concept in the study of social change.

Authors:  N B Ryder
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  1965-12

7.  Homicide mortality in the United States, 1935-1994: age, period, and cohort effects.

Authors:  C Shahpar; G Li
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  CDC growth charts: United States.

Authors:  R J Kuczmarski; C L Ogden; L M Grummer-Strawn; K M Flegal; S S Guo; R Wei; Z Mei; L R Curtin; A F Roche; C L Johnson
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2000-06-08

9.  Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000.

Authors:  Katherine M Flegal; Margaret D Carroll; Cynthia L Ogden; Clifford L Johnson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Fast foods, energy density and obesity: a possible mechanistic link.

Authors:  A M Prentice; S A Jebb
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.213

View more
  87 in total

1.  An age-period-cohort analysis of cancer incidence among the oldest old, Utah 1973-2002.

Authors:  Heidi A Hanson; Ken R Smith; Antoinette M Stroup; C Janna Harrell
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2014-11-14

2.  Declining rates of hepatocellular carcinoma in urban Shanghai: incidence trends in 1976-2005.

Authors:  Shan Gao; Wan-Shui Yang; Freddie Bray; Puthiery Va; Wei Zhang; Jing Gao; Yong-Bing Xiang
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Age, period and cohort effects on adult body mass index and overweight from 1991 to 2009 in China: the China Health and Nutrition Survey.

Authors:  Lindsay M Jaacks; Penny Gordon-Larsen; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Linda S Adair; Barry Popkin
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Early-life social origins of later-life body weight: the role of socioeconomic status and health behaviors over the life course.

Authors:  Tetyana Pudrovska; Ellis Scott Logan; Aliza Richman
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2014-02-22

5.  Age, period, and cohort effects in heavy episodic drinking in the US from 1985 to 2009.

Authors:  Katherine M Keyes; Richard Miech
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Benefits gained, benefits lost: comparing baby boomers to other generations in a longitudinal cohort study of self-rated health.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Badley; Mayilee Canizares; Anthony V Perruccio; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Monique A M Gignac
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  The Paradox of Positive Self-Concept and Low Achievement Among Black and Latinx Youth: A Test of Psychological Explanations.

Authors:  Eunjin Seo; Yishan Shen; Aprile D Benner
Journal:  Contemp Educ Psychol       Date:  2019-07-19

8.  Recent increases in depressive symptoms among US adolescents: trends from 1991 to 2018.

Authors:  Katherine M Keyes; Dahsan Gary; Patrick M O'Malley; Ava Hamilton; John Schulenberg
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 4.328

9.  A multiphase method for estimating cohort effects in age-period contingency table data.

Authors:  Katherine M Keyes; Guohua Li
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Identifying and describing a cohort effect in the national database of reported cases of hepatitis C virus infection in Canada (1991-2010): an age-period-cohort analysis.

Authors:  Max Trubnikov; Ping Yan; Jane Njihia; Chris Archibald
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2014-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.