BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate inter-observer and intra-observer target volume delineation (TVD) error in 4D-CT imaging of thoracic tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary and nodal gross tumour volumes (GTV) of 10 lung tumours on the 10 respiratory phases of a 4D-CT scan were contoured by six radiation oncologist observers. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability were assessed by the coefficient of variation (COV) and the volume overlap index (VOI). ANOVA was performed to assess differences in inter-observer and intra-observer variability based on patient case difficulty, respiratory phase, physician seniority, and physician observer. RESULTS: VOI analysis determined that inter-observer was a more significant source of error than intra-observer variability. VOI improved with the use of 4D-CT as compared to conventional CT. ANOVA analysis for COVs found case difficulty (easy versus difficult) to be significant for inter-observer primary tumour and intra-observer nodal disease delineation. Physician seniority, respiratory phase, and individual physician were not found to be significant for TVD error. CONCLUSION: Variability in TVD is a major source of error in 4D-CT treatment planning. Development of measures to reduce inter-observer and intra-observer TVD variability are necessary in order to deliver high quality radiotherapy. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate inter-observer and intra-observer target volume delineation (TVD) error in 4D-CT imaging of thoracic tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary and nodal gross tumour volumes (GTV) of 10 lung tumours on the 10 respiratory phases of a 4D-CT scan were contoured by six radiation oncologist observers. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability were assessed by the coefficient of variation (COV) and the volume overlap index (VOI). ANOVA was performed to assess differences in inter-observer and intra-observer variability based on patient case difficulty, respiratory phase, physician seniority, and physician observer. RESULTS: VOI analysis determined that inter-observer was a more significant source of error than intra-observer variability. VOI improved with the use of 4D-CT as compared to conventional CT. ANOVA analysis for COVs found case difficulty (easy versus difficult) to be significant for inter-observer primary tumour and intra-observer nodal disease delineation. Physician seniority, respiratory phase, and individual physician were not found to be significant for TVD error. CONCLUSION: Variability in TVD is a major source of error in 4D-CT treatment planning. Development of measures to reduce inter-observer and intra-observer TVD variability are necessary in order to deliver high quality radiotherapy. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Sarah A Mattonen; Shyama Tetar; David A Palma; Alexander V Louie; Suresh Senan; Aaron D Ward Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2015-11-12
Authors: Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Jeremiah Hwee; Alexander V Louie; Stewart Gaede; Glenn Bauman; David D'Souza; Tracy Sexton; Michael Lock; Belal Ahmad; George Rodrigues Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2011-09-09 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Yan Wang; Yong Bao; Li Zhang; Wei Fan; Han He; Zong-Wen Sun; Xiao Hu; Shao-Min Huang; Ming Chen; Xiao-Wu Deng Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 3.411