Literature DB >> 20120900

Impact of robotic surgery on obstetric-gynecologic resident training.

Karen Brenot1, Gregory L Goyert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the volume and type of surgical techniques for hysterectomies performed prior to and after the introduction of robotic surgery at our institution and to assess the potential impact on obstetric-gynecologic resident training. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study examined the number and types of hysterectomies performed at our institution during the 18 months prior to, and the 18 months after, the introduction of a robotic surgical system. Procedures performed during both time periods were compared by number and percentage using the chi2 or Fisher's exact test for counts < 5.
RESULTS: A total of 903 hysterectomies were performed from July 1, 2005, to July 1, 2008. There were 444 hysterectomies in the prerobotic surgical system group and 459 hysterectomies in the postrobotic surgical system group. There was a statistically significant decrease in the number of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomies (94 vs. 36; p < 0.001) and total abdominal hysterectomies (249 vs. 203; p < 0.001) performed.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a significant impact on the volume and type of surgical techniques for hysterectomies performed prior to and after the introduction of robotic surgery at our institution. This observation may have direct consequences for obstetric-gynecologic resident surgical experience.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20120900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  4 in total

1.  Progressive reduction in abdominal hysterectomy rates: impact of laparoscopy, robotics and surgeon factors.

Authors:  Michael Moen; Michael Noone; Aarathi Cholkeri-Singh; Brett Vassallo; Brian Locker; Charles Miller
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-06-11

2.  Integrating Robotic Technology Into Resident Training: Challenges and Recommendations From the Front Lines.

Authors:  Courtney A Green; Kelly M Mahuron; Hobart W Harris; Patricia S O'Sullivan
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 3.  Robotics in Gynecology: Why is this Technology Worth Pursuing?

Authors:  Rodrigo Ayala-Yáñez; Emilio José Olaya-Guzmán; Javier Haghenbeck-Altamirano
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Reprod Health       Date:  2013-07-24

4.  Implementation of robotic gynecological surgery in a German University Hospital: patient safety after 110 procedures.

Authors:  Dimitrios Balafoutas; Achim Wöckel; Christine Wulff; Ralf Joukhadar
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.344

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.